“No Matter What We Do, Nothing Is Enough”: A Qualitative Investigation of Political Despair

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lucy H. Bird, Emma F. Thomas, Michael Wenzel
{"title":"“No Matter What We Do, Nothing Is Enough”: A Qualitative Investigation of Political Despair","authors":"Lucy H. Bird,&nbsp;Emma F. Thomas,&nbsp;Michael Wenzel","doi":"10.1002/casp.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People often report experiencing despair about social issues like racial inequality and climate change. We conceptualise these feelings as <i>political despair</i> and consider: what causes political despair, that is, what are the antecedent appraisals? Participants, who felt despair about racial inequality (<i>N</i> = 196) or climate change (<i>N</i> = 179), responded to a prompt about why they feel despair about this issue. A framework analysis of participants responses, guided by appraisal theories of emotion, identified two broad themes (appraisals): perceptions that the issue is unjust and systemic (illegitimate) as well as being uncontrollable and unchanging (intractable). These themes (appraisals), consisting of nuanced sub-themes, explained political despair. The study suggests that political despair may be conceptualised as a discrete emotion with specific appraisals and a core relational theme of <i>unchangeable systemic injustice</i>. Understanding political despair is important given its prevalence among supporters of climate justice and racial equality, and its implications for well-being and political engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.70095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People often report experiencing despair about social issues like racial inequality and climate change. We conceptualise these feelings as political despair and consider: what causes political despair, that is, what are the antecedent appraisals? Participants, who felt despair about racial inequality (N = 196) or climate change (N = 179), responded to a prompt about why they feel despair about this issue. A framework analysis of participants responses, guided by appraisal theories of emotion, identified two broad themes (appraisals): perceptions that the issue is unjust and systemic (illegitimate) as well as being uncontrollable and unchanging (intractable). These themes (appraisals), consisting of nuanced sub-themes, explained political despair. The study suggests that political despair may be conceptualised as a discrete emotion with specific appraisals and a core relational theme of unchangeable systemic injustice. Understanding political despair is important given its prevalence among supporters of climate justice and racial equality, and its implications for well-being and political engagement.

Abstract Image

"无论我们做什么都不够":政治绝望的定性调查
人们经常报告对种族不平等和气候变化等社会问题感到绝望。我们将这些感觉概念化为政治绝望,并考虑:是什么导致了政治绝望,也就是说,什么是前因评价?对种族不平等(N = 196)或气候变化(N = 179)感到绝望的参与者回答了一个关于他们为什么对这个问题感到绝望的提示。在情感评价理论的指导下,对参与者的反应进行了框架分析,确定了两大主题(评价):认为问题是不公正的、系统性的(非法的),以及不可控的、不变的(棘手的)。这些主题(评价)由微妙的子主题组成,解释了政治绝望。该研究表明,政治绝望可能被概念化为一种具有特定评价的离散情感,以及不可改变的系统性不公正的核心关系主题。考虑到政治绝望在气候正义和种族平等的支持者中普遍存在,以及它对福祉和政治参与的影响,理解政治绝望非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信