Assessment of the Effects of Intake Temperature and Injector Structure on the Combustion Characteristics of Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Methanol Engines
Tai Yang, Wu Wei, Lun Zhao, Long Zhang, Jin Ba, Ning Xie
{"title":"Assessment of the Effects of Intake Temperature and Injector Structure on the Combustion Characteristics of Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Methanol Engines","authors":"Tai Yang, Wu Wei, Lun Zhao, Long Zhang, Jin Ba, Ning Xie","doi":"10.1002/ente.202401540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\nIn this article, to address the issues of slower droplet evaporation and fuel mixing inhomogeneity caused by the high latent heat of vaporization of methanol, the effects of the number of nozzle holes and spray cone angle (<i>θ</i><sub>sca</sub>) on the combustion characteristics of a direct-injection spark-ignition methanol engine are numerically investigated at different intake temperatures (<i>T</i><sub>int</sub>) under constant injection pressures. In the results, it is indicated that the maximum-indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) is 48.01% at 8 holes and a <i>T</i><sub>int</sub> of 328 K. Although the ITE at 298 K with 8 holes is 1.42% lower than 328 K, NOx emissions and ringing intensity (RI) are reduced by 90.46% and 90.61%, respectively. Simultaneously, emissions of CO, hydrocarbon (HC), Soot, unburned methanol, and formaldehyde remain at a low level. Second, there exists an optimal <i>θ</i><sub>sca</sub> at different holes, thus obtaining the best fuel economy and emissions. The maximum ITE is 48.1% at 8 holes and a <i>θ</i><sub>sca</sub> of 26°. Finally, under the same energy input and parameter, compared with the diesel engine of the optimal start of injection, the ITE of the optimized methanol engine is increased by 1.65%, and the RI, NOx, HC, CO, and Soot emissions are reduced by 98.58%, 77.85%, 99.35%, 85.71%, and 78.38%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":11573,"journal":{"name":"Energy technology","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ente.202401540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, to address the issues of slower droplet evaporation and fuel mixing inhomogeneity caused by the high latent heat of vaporization of methanol, the effects of the number of nozzle holes and spray cone angle (θsca) on the combustion characteristics of a direct-injection spark-ignition methanol engine are numerically investigated at different intake temperatures (Tint) under constant injection pressures. In the results, it is indicated that the maximum-indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) is 48.01% at 8 holes and a Tint of 328 K. Although the ITE at 298 K with 8 holes is 1.42% lower than 328 K, NOx emissions and ringing intensity (RI) are reduced by 90.46% and 90.61%, respectively. Simultaneously, emissions of CO, hydrocarbon (HC), Soot, unburned methanol, and formaldehyde remain at a low level. Second, there exists an optimal θsca at different holes, thus obtaining the best fuel economy and emissions. The maximum ITE is 48.1% at 8 holes and a θsca of 26°. Finally, under the same energy input and parameter, compared with the diesel engine of the optimal start of injection, the ITE of the optimized methanol engine is increased by 1.65%, and the RI, NOx, HC, CO, and Soot emissions are reduced by 98.58%, 77.85%, 99.35%, 85.71%, and 78.38%, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Energy Technology provides a forum for researchers and engineers from all relevant disciplines concerned with the generation, conversion, storage, and distribution of energy.
This new journal shall publish articles covering all technical aspects of energy process engineering from different perspectives, e.g.,
new concepts of energy generation and conversion;
design, operation, control, and optimization of processes for energy generation (e.g., carbon capture) and conversion of energy carriers;
improvement of existing processes;
combination of single components to systems for energy generation;
design of systems for energy storage;
production processes of fuels, e.g., hydrogen, electricity, petroleum, biobased fuels;
concepts and design of devices for energy distribution.