{"title":"Forestry, fire, and fur: factors influencing densities of endangered fishers (Pekania pennanti) in central British Columbia, Canada","authors":"Rory D. Fogarty, Richard D. Weir, Karl W. Larsen","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The isolated and endangered Columbian population of fishers (<i>Pekania pennanti</i>) is thought to be declining in central interior British Columbia, Canada, yet little is known about the distribution and abundance of the species in several regions. We conducted DNA-based mark-recapture surveys to estimate the density of fishers in 2 spatially distinct ecosystems where current data were lacking, and evaluated which factors best explained the distribution of fishers in each ecosystem. We found the density of fishers varied substantially between study areas, likely because of the level of trapping mortality during each survey season. The density of fishers in the Chilcotin study area west of Williams Lake was among the highest ever reported for the province (21.3 ± 3.8 [SE] fishers/1,000 km<sup>2</sup>), whereas density in the Enterprise study area southeast of Williams Lake was among the lowest (8.9 ± 2.7 fishers/1,000 km<sup>2</sup>). Density estimates for both study areas, however, were orders of magnitude lower than those reported for eastern North America and the western United States and thus are at levels worthy of concern. Forested stands with wet soil moisture regimes composed of older deciduous and spruce trees were most strongly related to higher densities in both study areas; these stands also were known to contain higher densities of the denning and resting structures fishers require to survive and reproduce. This study provided wildlife managers with a snapshot of the density of fishers in 2 areas of central interior British Columbia that will help refine the estimate for the endangered Columbian population. Additionally, this work suggests that reducing trapping mortality within the Columbian population of fishers and increasing the protection of high-value denning and resting habitats may both be necessary to promote the recovery of the species over the longer term.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The isolated and endangered Columbian population of fishers (Pekania pennanti) is thought to be declining in central interior British Columbia, Canada, yet little is known about the distribution and abundance of the species in several regions. We conducted DNA-based mark-recapture surveys to estimate the density of fishers in 2 spatially distinct ecosystems where current data were lacking, and evaluated which factors best explained the distribution of fishers in each ecosystem. We found the density of fishers varied substantially between study areas, likely because of the level of trapping mortality during each survey season. The density of fishers in the Chilcotin study area west of Williams Lake was among the highest ever reported for the province (21.3 ± 3.8 [SE] fishers/1,000 km2), whereas density in the Enterprise study area southeast of Williams Lake was among the lowest (8.9 ± 2.7 fishers/1,000 km2). Density estimates for both study areas, however, were orders of magnitude lower than those reported for eastern North America and the western United States and thus are at levels worthy of concern. Forested stands with wet soil moisture regimes composed of older deciduous and spruce trees were most strongly related to higher densities in both study areas; these stands also were known to contain higher densities of the denning and resting structures fishers require to survive and reproduce. This study provided wildlife managers with a snapshot of the density of fishers in 2 areas of central interior British Columbia that will help refine the estimate for the endangered Columbian population. Additionally, this work suggests that reducing trapping mortality within the Columbian population of fishers and increasing the protection of high-value denning and resting habitats may both be necessary to promote the recovery of the species over the longer term.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.