Development and psychometric validation of the Italian version of the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS)

Q3 Psychology
Giulio Emilio Brancati , Lisa Ventura , Alessandro Froli , Samuele Gemignani , Thomas E. Gift , Barrie K. Marchant , Giulio Perugi
{"title":"Development and psychometric validation of the Italian version of the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS)","authors":"Giulio Emilio Brancati ,&nbsp;Lisa Ventura ,&nbsp;Alessandro Froli ,&nbsp;Samuele Gemignani ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Gift ,&nbsp;Barrie K. Marchant ,&nbsp;Giulio Perugi","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><div>In this study we developed and validated the Italian version of the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS), a clinician-rated scale for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. It assesses both observable behavior and subjective experiences and is tailored to address clinical features more directly relevant to adults with the disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>50 participants were recruited, including 32 referred to the Psychiatry Unit 2 at Pisa University Hospital, and 18 recruited through snowball sampling. 25 were diagnosed with ADHD, 15 with other psychiatric conditions, and 10 were healthy controls. All participants were evaluated using the WRAADDS and a set of clinician-rated, informant-rated and self-rated instruments. Psychometric characteristics of the WRAADDS were assessed, including inter-rater reliability and internal consistency, as well as concurrent and criterion validity.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The WRAADDS total and composite domains score showed excellent inter-rater reliability (Spearman's <em>r</em> ≥ 0.815; <em>N</em> = 17) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.88). Concurrent validity was supported by correlations with measures of inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, and emotional dysregulation (<em>r</em> ≥ 0.6). Patients with ADHD scored significantly higher than the other participants on several WRAADDS scores and an ADHD composite score ≥ 8 distinguished patients with ADHD with accuracy = 88 %, sensitivity = 92 %, and specificity = 84 %. In conclusion, the Italian version of the WRAADDS is a valid assessment tool for adult ADHD, facilitating a comprehensive understanding of the disorder within the adult population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100908"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

In this study we developed and validated the Italian version of the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS), a clinician-rated scale for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. It assesses both observable behavior and subjective experiences and is tailored to address clinical features more directly relevant to adults with the disorder.

Methods

50 participants were recruited, including 32 referred to the Psychiatry Unit 2 at Pisa University Hospital, and 18 recruited through snowball sampling. 25 were diagnosed with ADHD, 15 with other psychiatric conditions, and 10 were healthy controls. All participants were evaluated using the WRAADDS and a set of clinician-rated, informant-rated and self-rated instruments. Psychometric characteristics of the WRAADDS were assessed, including inter-rater reliability and internal consistency, as well as concurrent and criterion validity.

Discussion

The WRAADDS total and composite domains score showed excellent inter-rater reliability (Spearman's r ≥ 0.815; N = 17) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.88). Concurrent validity was supported by correlations with measures of inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, and emotional dysregulation (r ≥ 0.6). Patients with ADHD scored significantly higher than the other participants on several WRAADDS scores and an ADHD composite score ≥ 8 distinguished patients with ADHD with accuracy = 88 %, sensitivity = 92 %, and specificity = 84 %. In conclusion, the Italian version of the WRAADDS is a valid assessment tool for adult ADHD, facilitating a comprehensive understanding of the disorder within the adult population.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信