Modesty differs between historical and modern Chinese: A computational analysis of modesty metalinguistics

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xi Chen , Yunwen Su
{"title":"Modesty differs between historical and modern Chinese: A computational analysis of modesty metalinguistics","authors":"Xi Chen ,&nbsp;Yunwen Su","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whether in studies of East Asian languages or in East-West comparisons, modesty has frequently been regarded as a traditional value held by the Confucianism-influenced ‘East’. However, using the tradition to explain modern speech behaviours raises the question of whether the understanding of modesty has remained the same over time. This study explores the metalanguage of modesty in historical and modern Chinese, to reveal what has indeed been inherited and what has changed in its understanding. It employs two computational methods, together with qualitative analysis, to examine corpus data where Chinese modesty lexemes, <em>qianxu</em> and <em>qianxun</em>, are used. Findings show that modesty remains to be a virtue and an interpersonal tactic at the abstract level over time. However, reciprocal and repeated practices of modesty, which were once ritualized in historical Chinese, largely ceased in modern Chinese. Self-effacement serves different sociopragmatic functions, and attention-avoidance behaviours are increasingly associated with modesty nowadays. More importantly, modesty in modern Chinese has been patterned with social qualities and practices that have not been identified in historical Chinese. The change reflects an influence of political propaganda in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 101729"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000125000245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether in studies of East Asian languages or in East-West comparisons, modesty has frequently been regarded as a traditional value held by the Confucianism-influenced ‘East’. However, using the tradition to explain modern speech behaviours raises the question of whether the understanding of modesty has remained the same over time. This study explores the metalanguage of modesty in historical and modern Chinese, to reveal what has indeed been inherited and what has changed in its understanding. It employs two computational methods, together with qualitative analysis, to examine corpus data where Chinese modesty lexemes, qianxu and qianxun, are used. Findings show that modesty remains to be a virtue and an interpersonal tactic at the abstract level over time. However, reciprocal and repeated practices of modesty, which were once ritualized in historical Chinese, largely ceased in modern Chinese. Self-effacement serves different sociopragmatic functions, and attention-avoidance behaviours are increasingly associated with modesty nowadays. More importantly, modesty in modern Chinese has been patterned with social qualities and practices that have not been identified in historical Chinese. The change reflects an influence of political propaganda in China.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Sciences
Language Sciences Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信