Complications of nasogastric tube insertion in critical care: A retrospective analysis of radiographs performed for determination of tube position

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
D. Watkin, C. Farrell, M. McGee, I. Welters
{"title":"Complications of nasogastric tube insertion in critical care: A retrospective analysis of radiographs performed for determination of tube position","authors":"D. Watkin,&nbsp;C. Farrell,&nbsp;M. McGee,&nbsp;I. Welters","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Feeding through incorrectly placed nasogastric tubes (NGTs) is associated with severe complications. We audit the management and complications of NGT insertions diagnosed on radiographs in a critical care population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Radiographs performed to ascertain NGT position, and subsequent clinical actions taken were retrospectively analysed. Nasogastric tube position and safety to initiate enteral feeding were extracted from radiology reports.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From July 2021–December 2022, 512 radiographs were performed, of which 508 were sufficient to determine NGT position. Ten percent of radiographs demonstrated incorrect NGT position. All NGTs inadvertently placed in the airway (2.2 %, 11/512) or coiled in the proximal oesophagus (1.0 %, 5/512) were removed.</div><div>Thirty-five NGTs were imaged in a suboptimal position, positioned in either the distal oesophagus or proximal stomach; however, only 51 % (18/35) were advanced by intensive care clinicians. In 46 % (16/35), radiology reports did not explicitly comment on the safety of use or recommend advancement of the NGT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiographs consistently detected NGT misplacement. However, not all unsafe placements were optimised by clinical teams in line with existing guidance. Radiology reports were not always explicit in describing the safety of the NGT for feeding or drug administration. Future quality improvement projects should aim to improve compliance with existing NGT guidance, and standardise radiology reports. New initiatives, including the Radiographer Led Nasogastric Tube Position Check Pathway may improve the efficiency and safety of nasogastric tube insertion in critical care.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Projectional radiography remains a sensitive screening method to detect NGT misplacement in the critically unwell. Compliance with established diagnostic criteria for confirmation of NGT position and standardised reporting are essential to avoid complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 102941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Feeding through incorrectly placed nasogastric tubes (NGTs) is associated with severe complications. We audit the management and complications of NGT insertions diagnosed on radiographs in a critical care population.

Methods

Radiographs performed to ascertain NGT position, and subsequent clinical actions taken were retrospectively analysed. Nasogastric tube position and safety to initiate enteral feeding were extracted from radiology reports.

Results

From July 2021–December 2022, 512 radiographs were performed, of which 508 were sufficient to determine NGT position. Ten percent of radiographs demonstrated incorrect NGT position. All NGTs inadvertently placed in the airway (2.2 %, 11/512) or coiled in the proximal oesophagus (1.0 %, 5/512) were removed.
Thirty-five NGTs were imaged in a suboptimal position, positioned in either the distal oesophagus or proximal stomach; however, only 51 % (18/35) were advanced by intensive care clinicians. In 46 % (16/35), radiology reports did not explicitly comment on the safety of use or recommend advancement of the NGT.

Conclusion

Radiographs consistently detected NGT misplacement. However, not all unsafe placements were optimised by clinical teams in line with existing guidance. Radiology reports were not always explicit in describing the safety of the NGT for feeding or drug administration. Future quality improvement projects should aim to improve compliance with existing NGT guidance, and standardise radiology reports. New initiatives, including the Radiographer Led Nasogastric Tube Position Check Pathway may improve the efficiency and safety of nasogastric tube insertion in critical care.

Implications for practice

Projectional radiography remains a sensitive screening method to detect NGT misplacement in the critically unwell. Compliance with established diagnostic criteria for confirmation of NGT position and standardised reporting are essential to avoid complications.
危重病患者鼻胃管置入的并发症:用于确定管位的x线片回顾性分析
通过放置不正确的鼻胃管(NGTs)进食会导致严重的并发症。我们审计的管理和并发症的NGT插入诊断在x线片在重症监护人群。方法回顾性分析x线片确定NGT的位置,以及随后采取的临床措施。从放射学报告中提取鼻胃管的位置和开始肠内喂养的安全性。结果2021年7月至2022年12月共行x线片512张,其中508张足以确定NGT的位置。10%的x光片显示NGT位置不正确。所有无意中放置在气道内(2.2%,11/512)或盘绕在食管近端(1.0%,5/512)的ngt均被移除。35例NGTs在次优位置成像,位于食管远端或胃近端;然而,只有51%(18/35)是由重症监护临床医生推进的。46%(16/35)的放射学报告没有明确评价使用的安全性或推荐NGT的进展。结论x线片一致检测到NGT错位。然而,并非所有不安全的安置都是由临床团队根据现有指导进行优化的。放射学报告并不总是明确描述NGT用于喂养或药物管理的安全性。未来的质量改进项目应旨在提高对现有NGT指南的遵从性,并使放射学报告标准化。新的举措,包括放射技师引导的鼻胃管位置检查路径,可能会提高危重护理中鼻胃管插入的效率和安全性。对实践的意义投影x线摄影仍然是一种敏感的筛查方法,用于检测严重不适的NGT错位。遵守确定NGT位置的既定诊断标准和标准化报告对于避免并发症至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信