Samuel C. Watson , Nirosh D. Aluthge , Rebecca A. Furbeck , Samodha C. Fernando , Byron D. Chaves , Gary A. Sullivan
{"title":"Impact of organic acid treatment on the microbial community composition of raw beef during extended refrigerated storage","authors":"Samuel C. Watson , Nirosh D. Aluthge , Rebecca A. Furbeck , Samodha C. Fernando , Byron D. Chaves , Gary A. Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.fm.2025.104787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limiting bacterial spoilage and thereby protecting the economic value of raw beef destined for export is a top priority of the United States beef industry. Organic acid processing aids are commonly used to decrease pathogenic loads on raw beef, but knowledge of their efficacy against common spoilage bacteria is limited. Beef chuck rolls (IMPS 116A, N = 24) were obtained from two different processing facilities in Nebraska and treated with either 4.5 % lactic acid, 2.5 % Beefxide®, or 380 ppm peroxyacetic acid alongside a no-treatment control. Samples were stored at 2.7 °C for 112 days. Every 28 days, samples were evaluated using aerobic, anaerobic, psychrotrophic, lactic acid bacteria, and <em>Pseudomonas</em> plate counts and using amplicon sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups were determined using DeSeq2. <em>Lactococcus</em> became the most abundant genus on day 28 and every subsequent sampling point regardless of treatment group. <em>Pseudomonas</em> and <em>Yersinia</em> were also present at perceptible levels and were identified to be higher in control samples compared to lactic acid treated samples through differential abundance analysis. Concentrations of culturable bacteria increased during storage across all plating methods (P < 0.05), but treatment differences were minimal. Overall, these treatments had impact on the bacterial diversity during storage. When considering the use of processing aids to limit spoilage, the treatment should be chosen based on a targeted specific spoilage organism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12399,"journal":{"name":"Food microbiology","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104787"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074000202500067X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Limiting bacterial spoilage and thereby protecting the economic value of raw beef destined for export is a top priority of the United States beef industry. Organic acid processing aids are commonly used to decrease pathogenic loads on raw beef, but knowledge of their efficacy against common spoilage bacteria is limited. Beef chuck rolls (IMPS 116A, N = 24) were obtained from two different processing facilities in Nebraska and treated with either 4.5 % lactic acid, 2.5 % Beefxide®, or 380 ppm peroxyacetic acid alongside a no-treatment control. Samples were stored at 2.7 °C for 112 days. Every 28 days, samples were evaluated using aerobic, anaerobic, psychrotrophic, lactic acid bacteria, and Pseudomonas plate counts and using amplicon sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups were determined using DeSeq2. Lactococcus became the most abundant genus on day 28 and every subsequent sampling point regardless of treatment group. Pseudomonas and Yersinia were also present at perceptible levels and were identified to be higher in control samples compared to lactic acid treated samples through differential abundance analysis. Concentrations of culturable bacteria increased during storage across all plating methods (P < 0.05), but treatment differences were minimal. Overall, these treatments had impact on the bacterial diversity during storage. When considering the use of processing aids to limit spoilage, the treatment should be chosen based on a targeted specific spoilage organism.
期刊介绍:
Food Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, review papers, letters, news items and book reviews dealing with all aspects of the microbiology of foods. The editors aim to publish manuscripts of the highest quality which are both relevant and applicable to the broad field covered by the journal. Studies must be novel, have a clear connection to food microbiology, and be of general interest to the international community of food microbiologists. The editors make every effort to ensure rapid and fair reviews, resulting in timely publication of accepted manuscripts.