Test anxiety across writing formats: The mediating role of perceived teacher strictness

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Abdullah Al Fraidan
{"title":"Test anxiety across writing formats: The mediating role of perceived teacher strictness","authors":"Abdullah Al Fraidan","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how different types of writing tasks can influence anxiety among students learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Specifically, we explored whether tasks requiring students to correct errors (indirect tasks) cause more anxiety than tasks that involve writing original content (direct tasks like essays or letters). We also investigated if students' perceptions of their teachers as strict affected their anxiety levels during these tasks. A total of 80 university students participated by completing various writing tasks, and 10 instructors shared their views through interviews. The results revealed that students experienced significantly greater anxiety when working on indirect tasks (editing) compared to direct writing tasks (essays or letters). Additionally, students who perceived their instructors as strict reported feeling anxious before starting the tasks, but this anxiety reduced during task performance. Our findings suggest that educators can reduce student anxiety by balancing assessment tasks and maintaining supportive classroom interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 104942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825002550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how different types of writing tasks can influence anxiety among students learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Specifically, we explored whether tasks requiring students to correct errors (indirect tasks) cause more anxiety than tasks that involve writing original content (direct tasks like essays or letters). We also investigated if students' perceptions of their teachers as strict affected their anxiety levels during these tasks. A total of 80 university students participated by completing various writing tasks, and 10 instructors shared their views through interviews. The results revealed that students experienced significantly greater anxiety when working on indirect tasks (editing) compared to direct writing tasks (essays or letters). Additionally, students who perceived their instructors as strict reported feeling anxious before starting the tasks, but this anxiety reduced during task performance. Our findings suggest that educators can reduce student anxiety by balancing assessment tasks and maintaining supportive classroom interactions.
写作形式的考试焦虑:教师严谨性感知的中介作用
本研究探讨了不同类型的写作任务如何影响学生学习英语作为外语(EFL)的焦虑。具体来说,我们探讨了要求学生纠正错误的任务(间接任务)是否比涉及原创内容的任务(直接任务,如论文或信件)更容易引起焦虑。我们还调查了学生对老师严厉的看法是否会影响他们在这些任务中的焦虑水平。共有80名大学生参与,完成了各种写作任务,10名教师通过访谈分享了他们的观点。结果显示,与直接写作任务(论文或信件)相比,学生在进行间接任务(编辑)时明显更焦虑。此外,那些认为老师严格的学生在开始任务前会感到焦虑,但在任务执行过程中这种焦虑会减少。我们的研究结果表明,教育工作者可以通过平衡评估任务和保持支持性的课堂互动来减少学生的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信