Explainable artificial intelligence for energy systems maintenance: A review on concepts, current techniques, challenges, and prospects

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mohammad Reza Shadi, Hamid Mirshekali, Hamid Reza Shaker
{"title":"Explainable artificial intelligence for energy systems maintenance: A review on concepts, current techniques, challenges, and prospects","authors":"Mohammad Reza Shadi,&nbsp;Hamid Mirshekali,&nbsp;Hamid Reza Shaker","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rising demand for energy requires high investments in network extensions and renewable sources, alongside replacing inefficient systems. Smart maintenance is important in minimizing unscheduled outages, reducing costs, improving network security, and increasing equipment’s life expectancy. The vast amount of data collected by sensors and measurements in energy networks makes it hard for humans to detect failures continuously. Thanks to recent breakthroughs in AI, the energy sector has boosted the use of intelligent algorithms in this field. Despite the widespread popularity and great results of machine learning (ML) models in many applications, they are mostly nevertheless considered ”black boxes” as understanding their functionality and transparency in real-world applications is challenging. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) tackles this by making AI systems’ decision-making processes transparent and interpretable. This review paper will not only make the roadmap clear but also ensure an in-depth awareness of the challenges, opportunities, and developments associated with this path by presenting two comprehensive taxonomies. Various XAI methods are compared; as an example, our findings show that SHAP offers high trustworthiness but is less suited for real-time use, while LIME provides faster solutions with lower trustworthiness. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first survey that provides an overview of XAI methods for energy systems maintenance (ESM). It addresses challenges like integrating XAI with IoT-powered digital twins, balancing explainability with cybersecurity, and ensuring scalability while proposing solutions to enhance reliability and efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 115668"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising demand for energy requires high investments in network extensions and renewable sources, alongside replacing inefficient systems. Smart maintenance is important in minimizing unscheduled outages, reducing costs, improving network security, and increasing equipment’s life expectancy. The vast amount of data collected by sensors and measurements in energy networks makes it hard for humans to detect failures continuously. Thanks to recent breakthroughs in AI, the energy sector has boosted the use of intelligent algorithms in this field. Despite the widespread popularity and great results of machine learning (ML) models in many applications, they are mostly nevertheless considered ”black boxes” as understanding their functionality and transparency in real-world applications is challenging. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) tackles this by making AI systems’ decision-making processes transparent and interpretable. This review paper will not only make the roadmap clear but also ensure an in-depth awareness of the challenges, opportunities, and developments associated with this path by presenting two comprehensive taxonomies. Various XAI methods are compared; as an example, our findings show that SHAP offers high trustworthiness but is less suited for real-time use, while LIME provides faster solutions with lower trustworthiness. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first survey that provides an overview of XAI methods for energy systems maintenance (ESM). It addresses challenges like integrating XAI with IoT-powered digital twins, balancing explainability with cybersecurity, and ensuring scalability while proposing solutions to enhance reliability and efficiency.

Abstract Image

用于能源系统维护的可解释人工智能:概念、当前技术、挑战和前景综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信