Modern approaches to surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence

Q3 Medicine
Natalia Price, Paul Moran
{"title":"Modern approaches to surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence","authors":"Natalia Price,&nbsp;Paul Moran","doi":"10.1016/j.ogrm.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent condition, affecting a significant proportion of women, with 13.6% requiring surgical intervention during their lifetime. Surgical treatments primarily aim to provide suburethral support or enhance urethral closure mechanisms. Traditionally, colposuspensions and autologous rectus fascial slings have been considered effective first-line surgical options for managing SUI. These procedures have shown reliable outcomes in terms of symptom relief and long-term efficacy. The use of midurethral tapes, once the most popular treatment option in the UK, is currently suspended due to the concerns about the risk of chronic pelvic pain and vaginal mesh exposure. It remains an option for women with deemed ‘exceptional circumstances’ and may be cautiously reintroduced into practice with certain prerequisites. The mesh ‘pause’ has driven a much-improved process of patient counselling, expectation setting, utilizsation of the ‘MDT’, enhanced surgical standards and data collection. It has led to a reassessment of surgical approaches. The current trend is for many women to request intra-urethral bulking (Bladder neck injection) as a first line procedure to treat primary SUI. There is a renewed focus on established methods like colposuspension, open or laparoscopic, and modified autologous fascial ‘sling on a string’. These procedures avoid mesh related risks but are associated with different risks such as new onset vaginal prolapse and post-operative voiding difficulty, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53410,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751721425000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevalent condition, affecting a significant proportion of women, with 13.6% requiring surgical intervention during their lifetime. Surgical treatments primarily aim to provide suburethral support or enhance urethral closure mechanisms. Traditionally, colposuspensions and autologous rectus fascial slings have been considered effective first-line surgical options for managing SUI. These procedures have shown reliable outcomes in terms of symptom relief and long-term efficacy. The use of midurethral tapes, once the most popular treatment option in the UK, is currently suspended due to the concerns about the risk of chronic pelvic pain and vaginal mesh exposure. It remains an option for women with deemed ‘exceptional circumstances’ and may be cautiously reintroduced into practice with certain prerequisites. The mesh ‘pause’ has driven a much-improved process of patient counselling, expectation setting, utilizsation of the ‘MDT’, enhanced surgical standards and data collection. It has led to a reassessment of surgical approaches. The current trend is for many women to request intra-urethral bulking (Bladder neck injection) as a first line procedure to treat primary SUI. There is a renewed focus on established methods like colposuspension, open or laparoscopic, and modified autologous fascial ‘sling on a string’. These procedures avoid mesh related risks but are associated with different risks such as new onset vaginal prolapse and post-operative voiding difficulty, respectively.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine
Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine is an authoritative and comprehensive resource that provides all obstetricians, gynaecologists and specialists in reproductive medicine with up-to-date reviews on all aspects of obstetrics and gynaecology. Over a 3-year cycle of 36 issues, the emphasis of the journal is on the clear and concise presentation of information of direct clinical relevance to specialists in the field and candidates studying for MRCOG Part II. Each issue contains review articles on obstetric and gynaecological topics. The journal is invaluable for obstetricians, gynaecologists and reproductive medicine specialists, in their role as trainers of MRCOG candidates and in keeping up to date across the broad span of the subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信