First-line vs Second-Line Catheter Ablation Therapy for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation—Data from a National Multicentre Registry

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ranin Hilu MD , Mahmoud Suleiman MD , Adi Elias MD, MPH , Ibrahim Marai MD , Roy Beinart MD , Eyal Nof MD , Yoav Michowitz MD , Michael Glikson MD , Yuval Konstantino MD , Moti Haim MD , David Luria MD , David Pereg MD , Avishag Laish-Farkash MD, PhD , Alexander Omelchenko MD , Israeli Working Group on Pacing and Electrophysiology
{"title":"First-line vs Second-Line Catheter Ablation Therapy for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation—Data from a National Multicentre Registry","authors":"Ranin Hilu MD ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Suleiman MD ,&nbsp;Adi Elias MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Marai MD ,&nbsp;Roy Beinart MD ,&nbsp;Eyal Nof MD ,&nbsp;Yoav Michowitz MD ,&nbsp;Michael Glikson MD ,&nbsp;Yuval Konstantino MD ,&nbsp;Moti Haim MD ,&nbsp;David Luria MD ,&nbsp;David Pereg MD ,&nbsp;Avishag Laish-Farkash MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander Omelchenko MD ,&nbsp;Israeli Working Group on Pacing and Electrophysiology","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An early catheter ablation treatment strategy is effective for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In clinical practice, most patients undergo catheter ablation as a second-line treatment, following a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of AF catheter ablation performed as a first-line vs a second-line approach, based on data from the nationwide, multicentre Israeli Catheter Ablation Registry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following AF catheter ablation, patients were stratified into 2 groups—first-line vs second-line therapy approaches. The second-line group included AF patients who were referred for catheter ablation following treatment with at least one AAD. The primary endpoint was the 1-year freedom from AF recurrence. The secondary endpoints included 1-year hospitalizations, death, cerebrovascular events, and the composite of adverse cardiac events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 923 participants had a mean age of 66 ± 4.5 years. Catheter ablation was performed as a first-line therapy in 192 patients (20.8%). Median times from AF diagnosis to catheter ablation were 1.5 and 3 years in the first- and second-line groups, respectively. Patients in the first-line group were younger, had a shorter AF duration, and more frequently had a normal left atrial size prior to the procedure. The primary endpoint of AF recurrence at 1 year did not differ significantly between the groups (24.9% vs 30%, <em>P</em> = 0.205). No significant differences in the incidence of secondary outcomes occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Mildly delayed AF catheter ablation for patients with AF did not compromise the procedure’s efficacy or safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X25000423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An early catheter ablation treatment strategy is effective for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In clinical practice, most patients undergo catheter ablation as a second-line treatment, following a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of AF catheter ablation performed as a first-line vs a second-line approach, based on data from the nationwide, multicentre Israeli Catheter Ablation Registry.

Methods

Following AF catheter ablation, patients were stratified into 2 groups—first-line vs second-line therapy approaches. The second-line group included AF patients who were referred for catheter ablation following treatment with at least one AAD. The primary endpoint was the 1-year freedom from AF recurrence. The secondary endpoints included 1-year hospitalizations, death, cerebrovascular events, and the composite of adverse cardiac events.

Results

The 923 participants had a mean age of 66 ± 4.5 years. Catheter ablation was performed as a first-line therapy in 192 patients (20.8%). Median times from AF diagnosis to catheter ablation were 1.5 and 3 years in the first- and second-line groups, respectively. Patients in the first-line group were younger, had a shorter AF duration, and more frequently had a normal left atrial size prior to the procedure. The primary endpoint of AF recurrence at 1 year did not differ significantly between the groups (24.9% vs 30%, P = 0.205). No significant differences in the incidence of secondary outcomes occurred.

Conclusions

Mildly delayed AF catheter ablation for patients with AF did not compromise the procedure’s efficacy or safety.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信