Me, us, or the planet: Who comes first? An explanatory analysis of consumer motivation for sustainable food consumption

IF 3.7 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mariarosaria Simeone , Fabio Verneau , Carlo Russo
{"title":"Me, us, or the planet: Who comes first? An explanatory analysis of consumer motivation for sustainable food consumption","authors":"Mariarosaria Simeone ,&nbsp;Fabio Verneau ,&nbsp;Carlo Russo","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines three key research questions related to altruistic and egoistic motivations for sustainable behavior. It explores whether altruism is an intrinsic characteristic or context-dependent, if the distinction between altruism and egoism should be modeled as a binary or a continuum, and whether a linear or multidimensional approach is more suitable. The study, conducted using data from a sample of 396 Italian consumers suggests that motivations for sustainable consumption may shift depending on specific issues and highlights the limitations of using a binary framework to measure these motivations. This research contributes to understanding the complex drivers behind sustainable behavior emphasizing the roles of egoism and altruism. It was found that these motivations vary across consumers, with altruism emerging as a mix of personal traits and contextual factors. Furthermore, a binary framework for understanding consumer attitudes is insufficient, as a third group was identified, blending both altruistic and egoistic elements. The study also highlighted the importance of awareness campaigns and suggested that combining altruistic and egoistic appeals in advertising can be more effective than focusing on just one motivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784325000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines three key research questions related to altruistic and egoistic motivations for sustainable behavior. It explores whether altruism is an intrinsic characteristic or context-dependent, if the distinction between altruism and egoism should be modeled as a binary or a continuum, and whether a linear or multidimensional approach is more suitable. The study, conducted using data from a sample of 396 Italian consumers suggests that motivations for sustainable consumption may shift depending on specific issues and highlights the limitations of using a binary framework to measure these motivations. This research contributes to understanding the complex drivers behind sustainable behavior emphasizing the roles of egoism and altruism. It was found that these motivations vary across consumers, with altruism emerging as a mix of personal traits and contextual factors. Furthermore, a binary framework for understanding consumer attitudes is insufficient, as a third group was identified, blending both altruistic and egoistic elements. The study also highlighted the importance of awareness campaigns and suggested that combining altruistic and egoistic appeals in advertising can be more effective than focusing on just one motivation.
我,我们,还是地球:谁先来?消费者可持续食品消费动机的解释性分析
本研究考察了与可持续行为的利他和利己动机相关的三个关键研究问题。它探讨了利他主义是一种内在特征还是情境依赖,利他主义和利己主义之间的区别应该被建模为二元还是连续体,以及线性还是多维方法更合适。这项研究使用了396名意大利消费者的样本数据,表明可持续消费的动机可能会因具体问题而发生变化,并强调了使用二元框架来衡量这些动机的局限性。这项研究有助于理解可持续行为背后的复杂驱动因素,强调利己主义和利他主义的作用。研究发现,这些动机因消费者而异,利他主义是个人特质和环境因素的混合体。此外,理解消费者态度的二元框架是不够的,因为确定了第三组,混合了利他主义和利己主义的元素。该研究还强调了宣传活动的重要性,并建议将广告中的利他主义和利己主义结合起来,比只关注一种动机更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信