Financial textual sentiment connectedness: Evidence from alternative data

Yudhvir Seetharam, Kingstone Nyakurukwa
{"title":"Financial textual sentiment connectedness: Evidence from alternative data","authors":"Yudhvir Seetharam,&nbsp;Kingstone Nyakurukwa","doi":"10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the connectedness of various firm-level investor sentiment proxies—news, social media, ESG positive (ESGpos), and ESG negative (ESGneg) sentiment using aggregate connectedness measures and a sample of DJIA stocks between 2015 and 2024. Our findings reveal that each sentiment proxy maintains strong internal consistency, predominantly shaped by its own sources. Specifically, news and social media exhibit high self-connection scores, indicating that these proxies are primarily influenced by their respective content. ESG sentiment proxies show minimal cross-influence from news and social media, indicating their distinct and independent nature. Network analysis further highlights that news and social media transmit sentiment shocks, while ESG-based proxies are predominantly receivers. The most significant flow of sentiment shocks is from social media to ESG negative sentiment. This reflects the central role of social media in shaping sentiment within the system, in contrast to the more isolated influence of news. During significant global event periods, ESGpos and ESGneg shift roles, with ESGpos becoming a transmitter and ESGneg a receiver of sentiment shocks. Sector-specific analysis shows that the Financials (Technology) sector is a net transmitter (receiver) of sentiment shocks. The practical implications of the findings are discussed. The paper contributes to the literature, which has treated different sentiment proxies as distinct phenomena despite their interconnectedness. Additionally, we find that the aggregate connectedness measures used in this study exhibit stronger connectedness compared to the traditional Diebold-Yilmaz framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management Data Insights","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management Data Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667096825000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the connectedness of various firm-level investor sentiment proxies—news, social media, ESG positive (ESGpos), and ESG negative (ESGneg) sentiment using aggregate connectedness measures and a sample of DJIA stocks between 2015 and 2024. Our findings reveal that each sentiment proxy maintains strong internal consistency, predominantly shaped by its own sources. Specifically, news and social media exhibit high self-connection scores, indicating that these proxies are primarily influenced by their respective content. ESG sentiment proxies show minimal cross-influence from news and social media, indicating their distinct and independent nature. Network analysis further highlights that news and social media transmit sentiment shocks, while ESG-based proxies are predominantly receivers. The most significant flow of sentiment shocks is from social media to ESG negative sentiment. This reflects the central role of social media in shaping sentiment within the system, in contrast to the more isolated influence of news. During significant global event periods, ESGpos and ESGneg shift roles, with ESGpos becoming a transmitter and ESGneg a receiver of sentiment shocks. Sector-specific analysis shows that the Financials (Technology) sector is a net transmitter (receiver) of sentiment shocks. The practical implications of the findings are discussed. The paper contributes to the literature, which has treated different sentiment proxies as distinct phenomena despite their interconnectedness. Additionally, we find that the aggregate connectedness measures used in this study exhibit stronger connectedness compared to the traditional Diebold-Yilmaz framework.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信