Financial textual sentiment connectedness: Evidence from alternative data

Yudhvir Seetharam, Kingstone Nyakurukwa
{"title":"Financial textual sentiment connectedness: Evidence from alternative data","authors":"Yudhvir Seetharam,&nbsp;Kingstone Nyakurukwa","doi":"10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the connectedness of various firm-level investor sentiment proxies—news, social media, ESG positive (ESGpos), and ESG negative (ESGneg) sentiment using aggregate connectedness measures and a sample of DJIA stocks between 2015 and 2024. Our findings reveal that each sentiment proxy maintains strong internal consistency, predominantly shaped by its own sources. Specifically, news and social media exhibit high self-connection scores, indicating that these proxies are primarily influenced by their respective content. ESG sentiment proxies show minimal cross-influence from news and social media, indicating their distinct and independent nature. Network analysis further highlights that news and social media transmit sentiment shocks, while ESG-based proxies are predominantly receivers. The most significant flow of sentiment shocks is from social media to ESG negative sentiment. This reflects the central role of social media in shaping sentiment within the system, in contrast to the more isolated influence of news. During significant global event periods, ESGpos and ESGneg shift roles, with ESGpos becoming a transmitter and ESGneg a receiver of sentiment shocks. Sector-specific analysis shows that the Financials (Technology) sector is a net transmitter (receiver) of sentiment shocks. The practical implications of the findings are discussed. The paper contributes to the literature, which has treated different sentiment proxies as distinct phenomena despite their interconnectedness. Additionally, we find that the aggregate connectedness measures used in this study exhibit stronger connectedness compared to the traditional Diebold-Yilmaz framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management Data Insights","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management Data Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667096825000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the connectedness of various firm-level investor sentiment proxies—news, social media, ESG positive (ESGpos), and ESG negative (ESGneg) sentiment using aggregate connectedness measures and a sample of DJIA stocks between 2015 and 2024. Our findings reveal that each sentiment proxy maintains strong internal consistency, predominantly shaped by its own sources. Specifically, news and social media exhibit high self-connection scores, indicating that these proxies are primarily influenced by their respective content. ESG sentiment proxies show minimal cross-influence from news and social media, indicating their distinct and independent nature. Network analysis further highlights that news and social media transmit sentiment shocks, while ESG-based proxies are predominantly receivers. The most significant flow of sentiment shocks is from social media to ESG negative sentiment. This reflects the central role of social media in shaping sentiment within the system, in contrast to the more isolated influence of news. During significant global event periods, ESGpos and ESGneg shift roles, with ESGpos becoming a transmitter and ESGneg a receiver of sentiment shocks. Sector-specific analysis shows that the Financials (Technology) sector is a net transmitter (receiver) of sentiment shocks. The practical implications of the findings are discussed. The paper contributes to the literature, which has treated different sentiment proxies as distinct phenomena despite their interconnectedness. Additionally, we find that the aggregate connectedness measures used in this study exhibit stronger connectedness compared to the traditional Diebold-Yilmaz framework.
金融文本情感关联:来自替代数据的证据
本研究调查了各种公司层面投资者情绪代理的连通性-新闻,社交媒体,ESG积极(ESGpos)和ESG消极(ESGneg)情绪,使用总连通性度量和2015年至2024年间道琼斯指数股票样本。我们的研究结果表明,每个情绪代理都保持着很强的内部一致性,主要由其自己的来源形成。具体而言,新闻和社交媒体表现出较高的自我连接得分,表明这些代理主要受其各自内容的影响。ESG情绪代理受新闻和社交媒体的交叉影响最小,表明它们的独特性和独立性。网络分析进一步强调,新闻和社交媒体传播情绪冲击,而基于esg的代理主要是接受者。情绪冲击最显著的流动是从社交媒体到ESG负面情绪。这反映了社交媒体在塑造系统内部情绪方面的核心作用,而新闻的影响则更为孤立。在全球重大事件期间,esgpo和ESGneg的角色发生了转变,esgpo成为情绪冲击的传递者,ESGneg成为情绪冲击的接受者。具体行业分析显示,金融(科技)板块是情绪冲击的净发送者(接收者)。讨论了研究结果的实际意义。这篇论文为文献做出了贡献,这些文献将不同的情绪代理视为不同的现象,尽管它们是相互联系的。此外,我们发现,与传统的Diebold-Yilmaz框架相比,本研究中使用的总体连通性指标表现出更强的连通性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信