{"title":"The utility of coproantigen testing in screening populations","authors":"K. Wade Burton, Helen Michael, Corie Drake","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Detection of intestinal parasites is essential for veterinarians to assess risk of parasite infections. Traditionally, detection of intestinal parasites has relied primarily on detection of ova with fecal flotation methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of a commercially available coproantigen immunoassay detecting roundworms, hookworms, whipworms, <em>Dipylidium caninum</em>, <em>Giardia</em> and <em>Cystoisospora</em> spp<em>.</em> for detecting GI parasite infections in dogs and cats. The study evaluated test positivity of coproantigen and centrifugal fecal flotation and how often fecal flotation results would lead to clinical management changes compared to the result on coproantigen.</div><div>Results for 898,299 samples submitted to a commercial reference laboratory (IDEXX Laboratories) over the three-month period from March 6, 2024, through June 6, 2024, with paired results for coproantigen immunoassay and centrifugal fecal flotation (O&P) were used for analysis. 83.7 % of samples were negative by both coproantigen and O&P. 6.1 % were positive on both methods and would result in the same treatment indicated. An additional 9.4 % of samples had a positive coproantigen result indicating a need for treatment but had no parasite detected by O&P. Finally, when samples with evidence of coprophagy are excluded, only 0.6 % of samples had a positive O&P result but were negative for all coproantigens. Coproantigen was more effective at identifying dogs and cats where antiparasitic management was needed than O&P. The results of this study support the use of coproantigen immunoassay testing as a highly accurate and effective screening method for intestinal parasitism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 110459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725000706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Detection of intestinal parasites is essential for veterinarians to assess risk of parasite infections. Traditionally, detection of intestinal parasites has relied primarily on detection of ova with fecal flotation methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of a commercially available coproantigen immunoassay detecting roundworms, hookworms, whipworms, Dipylidium caninum, Giardia and Cystoisospora spp. for detecting GI parasite infections in dogs and cats. The study evaluated test positivity of coproantigen and centrifugal fecal flotation and how often fecal flotation results would lead to clinical management changes compared to the result on coproantigen.
Results for 898,299 samples submitted to a commercial reference laboratory (IDEXX Laboratories) over the three-month period from March 6, 2024, through June 6, 2024, with paired results for coproantigen immunoassay and centrifugal fecal flotation (O&P) were used for analysis. 83.7 % of samples were negative by both coproantigen and O&P. 6.1 % were positive on both methods and would result in the same treatment indicated. An additional 9.4 % of samples had a positive coproantigen result indicating a need for treatment but had no parasite detected by O&P. Finally, when samples with evidence of coprophagy are excluded, only 0.6 % of samples had a positive O&P result but were negative for all coproantigens. Coproantigen was more effective at identifying dogs and cats where antiparasitic management was needed than O&P. The results of this study support the use of coproantigen immunoassay testing as a highly accurate and effective screening method for intestinal parasitism.
期刊介绍:
The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership.
Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.