The use of personal contact information for patient communication in ophthalmology

Kelsey M. Donovan , Prem N. Patel , Sandra Hoyek , Celine Chaaya , Hasenin Al-khersan , Kenneth C. Fan , Nicolas A. Yannuzzi , Jayanth Sridhar , Nimesh A. Patel
{"title":"The use of personal contact information for patient communication in ophthalmology","authors":"Kelsey M. Donovan ,&nbsp;Prem N. Patel ,&nbsp;Sandra Hoyek ,&nbsp;Celine Chaaya ,&nbsp;Hasenin Al-khersan ,&nbsp;Kenneth C. Fan ,&nbsp;Nicolas A. Yannuzzi ,&nbsp;Jayanth Sridhar ,&nbsp;Nimesh A. Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine rates of personal communication between patients and ophthalmologists.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This was a cross-sectional study assessing ophthalmologists’ electronic communication practices with patients in 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An online survey was distributed to a convenience sample of ophthalmologists through an ophthalmology email listserv in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 92 respondents, the average age was 55.2 (range: 32–86) and most were male (70.7 %) with &gt;10 years of attending experience (81.5 %). Overall, 63.0 % of respondents shared their personal phone number or email address with patients, more frequently for post-operative patients (63.0 %) or patients with complications (52.2 %). Many respondents (55.4 %) did not discuss guidelines for using their personal email or phone number with patients and the majority (87.0 %) expressed little or no regret in sharing their contact information. Most ophthalmologists (76.1 %) endorsed reimbursement for extra time talking with patients outside of clinic appointments, while few (6.5 %) billed for their calls. Documentation of electronic encounters in the electronic medical record showed 44.6 % documenting most of the time and 30.4 % rarely documenting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Many ophthalmologists share their personal email address or phone number with patients without setting guidelines for patients using them or properly documenting and billing for the electronic encounter. This suggests a need for improved accessibility of physicians through office phone numbers. Additionally, guidelines may be warranted to support ophthalmologists in documenting and billing for electronic communications for patient safety and medicolegal purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine rates of personal communication between patients and ophthalmologists.

Design

This was a cross-sectional study assessing ophthalmologists’ electronic communication practices with patients in 2021.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to a convenience sample of ophthalmologists through an ophthalmology email listserv in the United States.

Results

Of 92 respondents, the average age was 55.2 (range: 32–86) and most were male (70.7 %) with >10 years of attending experience (81.5 %). Overall, 63.0 % of respondents shared their personal phone number or email address with patients, more frequently for post-operative patients (63.0 %) or patients with complications (52.2 %). Many respondents (55.4 %) did not discuss guidelines for using their personal email or phone number with patients and the majority (87.0 %) expressed little or no regret in sharing their contact information. Most ophthalmologists (76.1 %) endorsed reimbursement for extra time talking with patients outside of clinic appointments, while few (6.5 %) billed for their calls. Documentation of electronic encounters in the electronic medical record showed 44.6 % documenting most of the time and 30.4 % rarely documenting.

Conclusion

Many ophthalmologists share their personal email address or phone number with patients without setting guidelines for patients using them or properly documenting and billing for the electronic encounter. This suggests a need for improved accessibility of physicians through office phone numbers. Additionally, guidelines may be warranted to support ophthalmologists in documenting and billing for electronic communications for patient safety and medicolegal purposes.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信