{"title":"Machine Learning-Driven Ink Concentration Optimization in Solution-Processed Organic Light-Emitting Diodes for Enhanced Current Efficiency","authors":"Ji Soo Kim, Soon-Hyung Kwon* and Youn Sang Kim*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsaelm.4c0227110.1021/acsaelm.4c02271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Optimizing an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) structure for high efficiency typically requires extensive efforts in tuning layer thicknesses and conducting photometric analyses. While computational simulations can shorten the optimization process, applying them to solution-processed OLEDs (s-OLEDs) is challenging since ink concentration affects both the thickness and morphology of films, complicating the simulation substantially. To address this, we employed machine learning (ML), specifically Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), to optimize s-OLED ink concentrations without the need to calibrate material- or thickness-dependent properties typically required in conventional simulations. The GPR model efficiently suggested optimal ink concentrations for the hole transport layer (<i>c</i><sub>HTL</sub>) and electron transport layer (<i>c</i><sub>ETL</sub>) to maximize the current efficiency (CE). Using a data set of ink concentrations (2.5–17.5 g/L) as input and CE measured at 100, 1000, and 10,000 cd/m<sup>2</sup> as output, the model was trained to propose viable combinations of <i>c</i><sub>HTL</sub> and <i>c</i><sub>ETL</sub>. The GPR model successfully identified three distinct optimal ink concentration pairs within just three experimental iterations. By integrating GPR with spectral analysis, we also uncovered the interplay among ink concentration, recombination zone dynamics, and CE. Based on these findings, we proposed a mechanism explaining why distinct ink concentration pairs yield higher efficiency at different luminance levels. This study highlights the potential of ML techniques not only in streamlining s-OLED optimization but also in providing deeper insights into the relationships among the s-OLED structure, charge carrier dynamics, and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":"7 7","pages":"2803–2811 2803–2811"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsaelm.4c02271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Optimizing an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) structure for high efficiency typically requires extensive efforts in tuning layer thicknesses and conducting photometric analyses. While computational simulations can shorten the optimization process, applying them to solution-processed OLEDs (s-OLEDs) is challenging since ink concentration affects both the thickness and morphology of films, complicating the simulation substantially. To address this, we employed machine learning (ML), specifically Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), to optimize s-OLED ink concentrations without the need to calibrate material- or thickness-dependent properties typically required in conventional simulations. The GPR model efficiently suggested optimal ink concentrations for the hole transport layer (cHTL) and electron transport layer (cETL) to maximize the current efficiency (CE). Using a data set of ink concentrations (2.5–17.5 g/L) as input and CE measured at 100, 1000, and 10,000 cd/m2 as output, the model was trained to propose viable combinations of cHTL and cETL. The GPR model successfully identified three distinct optimal ink concentration pairs within just three experimental iterations. By integrating GPR with spectral analysis, we also uncovered the interplay among ink concentration, recombination zone dynamics, and CE. Based on these findings, we proposed a mechanism explaining why distinct ink concentration pairs yield higher efficiency at different luminance levels. This study highlights the potential of ML techniques not only in streamlining s-OLED optimization but also in providing deeper insights into the relationships among the s-OLED structure, charge carrier dynamics, and performance.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric.
Indexed/Abstracted:
Web of Science SCIE
Scopus
CAS
INSPEC
Portico