Dynamic Accounting of Carbon Uptake in the Built Environment

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Elisabeth Van Roijen*, Seth Kane, Jin Fan, Josefine A. Olsson, Baishakhi Bose, Thomas P. Hendrickson, Sarah L. Nordahl, Alissa Kendall, Corinne D. Scown and Sabbie A. Miller, 
{"title":"Dynamic Accounting of Carbon Uptake in the Built Environment","authors":"Elisabeth Van Roijen*,&nbsp;Seth Kane,&nbsp;Jin Fan,&nbsp;Josefine A. Olsson,&nbsp;Baishakhi Bose,&nbsp;Thomas P. Hendrickson,&nbsp;Sarah L. Nordahl,&nbsp;Alissa Kendall,&nbsp;Corinne D. Scown and Sabbie A. Miller,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c0008010.1021/acs.est.5c00080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Transforming building materials from net life-cycle CO<sub>2</sub>e emitters to carbon sinks is a key pathway towards decarbonizing the industrial sector. Current life-cycle assessments of materials (particularly “low-carbon” materials) often focus on cradle-to-gate emissions, which can exclude emissions and uptake (i.e., fluxes) later in the materials’ life-cycle. Further, conventional CO<sub>2</sub>e emission characterization disregards the dynamic effects of the timing of emissions and uptake on cumulative radiative forcing from processes like manufacturing, biomass growth, and the decadal carbon storage in long-lived building materials. This work presents a framework to analyze the cradle-to-grave CO<sub>2</sub>e balance of building materials using a time-dependent global warming potential calculation. We apply this framework in the dynamic accounting of carbon uptake in the built environment (D-CUBE) tool and examine two case studies: concrete and cross-laminated timber (CLT). When accounting for dynamic effects, the long storage time of biogenic carbon in CLT results in reduced warming, while the slow rate of uptake via concrete carbonation does not result in significant reductions in global warming. The D-CUBE tool allows for consistent comparisons across materials and emissions mitigation strategies at varying life-cycle stages and can be adapted to other materials or systems with different lifespans and applications. The flexibility of D-CUBE and the ability to identify CO<sub>2</sub>e emission hot-spot life-cycle stages will be instrumental in identifying pathways to achieving net-carbon-sequestering building materials.</p><p >Typical global warming potential calculations do not consider the timing of emissions. The presented framework enables assessment of dynamic fluxes of long lifespan materials, more accurately informing decarbonization efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 13","pages":"6556–6566 6556–6566"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c00080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c00080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transforming building materials from net life-cycle CO2e emitters to carbon sinks is a key pathway towards decarbonizing the industrial sector. Current life-cycle assessments of materials (particularly “low-carbon” materials) often focus on cradle-to-gate emissions, which can exclude emissions and uptake (i.e., fluxes) later in the materials’ life-cycle. Further, conventional CO2e emission characterization disregards the dynamic effects of the timing of emissions and uptake on cumulative radiative forcing from processes like manufacturing, biomass growth, and the decadal carbon storage in long-lived building materials. This work presents a framework to analyze the cradle-to-grave CO2e balance of building materials using a time-dependent global warming potential calculation. We apply this framework in the dynamic accounting of carbon uptake in the built environment (D-CUBE) tool and examine two case studies: concrete and cross-laminated timber (CLT). When accounting for dynamic effects, the long storage time of biogenic carbon in CLT results in reduced warming, while the slow rate of uptake via concrete carbonation does not result in significant reductions in global warming. The D-CUBE tool allows for consistent comparisons across materials and emissions mitigation strategies at varying life-cycle stages and can be adapted to other materials or systems with different lifespans and applications. The flexibility of D-CUBE and the ability to identify CO2e emission hot-spot life-cycle stages will be instrumental in identifying pathways to achieving net-carbon-sequestering building materials.

Typical global warming potential calculations do not consider the timing of emissions. The presented framework enables assessment of dynamic fluxes of long lifespan materials, more accurately informing decarbonization efforts.

建筑环境中碳吸收的动态计算
将建筑材料从生命周期二氧化碳的净排放者转变为碳汇是实现工业部门脱碳的关键途径。目前对材料(特别是“低碳”材料)的生命周期评估往往侧重于从摇篮到闸门的排放,这可以排除材料生命周期后期的排放和吸收(即通量)。此外,传统的二氧化碳排放表征忽略了排放和吸收的时间对制造、生物量增长和长寿命建筑材料的年代代性碳储存等过程的累积辐射强迫的动态影响。这项工作提出了一个框架,利用随时间变化的全球变暖潜势计算来分析建筑材料从摇篮到坟墓的二氧化碳当量平衡。我们将这一框架应用于建筑环境中碳吸收的动态核算(D-CUBE)工具,并研究了两个案例研究:混凝土和交叉层压木材(CLT)。当考虑到动态效应时,CLT中生物源碳的长时间储存导致了全球变暖的减缓,而通过混凝土碳化的缓慢吸收速率并没有导致全球变暖的显著减缓。D-CUBE工具允许在不同生命周期阶段对材料和减排策略进行一致的比较,并且可以适用于具有不同寿命和应用的其他材料或系统。D-CUBE的灵活性和识别二氧化碳排放热点生命周期阶段的能力将有助于确定实现净碳封存建筑材料的途径。典型的全球变暖潜势计算不考虑排放的时间。所提出的框架能够评估长寿命材料的动态通量,更准确地为脱碳工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信