Shortening antibiotic therapy duration for hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a causal inference model from the international EUROBACT-2 database

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Lena Gajdos, Niccolo Buetti, Alexis Tabah, Stephane Ruckly, Murat Akova, Frederik Sjöval, Kostoula Arvanti, Jan de Waele, Hendrik Bracht, Francois Barbier, Jean-François Timsit
{"title":"Shortening antibiotic therapy duration for hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a causal inference model from the international EUROBACT-2 database","authors":"Lena Gajdos, Niccolo Buetti, Alexis Tabah, Stephane Ruckly, Murat Akova, Frederik Sjöval, Kostoula Arvanti, Jan de Waele, Hendrik Bracht, Francois Barbier, Jean-François Timsit","doi":"10.1007/s00134-025-07857-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) are severe and require antibiotic therapy. In non-complicated BSIs, shortened therapy reduces side effects without compromising efficacy. The impact of shortened antibiotic therapy in HA-BSI critically ill patients without indication of prolonged therapy requires further evaluation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Using the international prospective EUROBACT-2 cohort, we compared shortened (7–10 days) versus long (14–21 days) treatment durations in ICU patients eligible for shortened therapy. Patients without antibiotic therapy within 3 days after HA-BSI occurrence or requiring prolonged therapy (due to infection source, microorganism, or clinical deterioration) were excluded. Treatment failure, defined as death, persistent infection, or subsequent infectious complications by Day 28, was assessed using an inverse-probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) logistic regression.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Among 2600 patients, 550 were eligible for shortened treatment, 213 received short, and 337 received long treatment. The most common infection source was intravascular catheters (33%), most common microorganisms were <i>Enterobacterales</i> (39%). Patients with long treatment were more frequently infected with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (11% vs. 5.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.025) or difficult-to-treat microorganisms (23% vs. 7%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and received more commonly combination therapy (46% vs. 30%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Short treatment was associated with reduced 28-day treatment failure (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93, <i>p</i> = 0.019), mainly due to reduction in subsequent infectious complications (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.018). Mortality (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.59, 1.43], <i>p</i> = 0.7) and persistent infection rates (OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.17, 1.14], <i>p</i> = 0.12) were similar.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In selected ICU patients with HA-BSI, shortened antibiotic treatment might be considered. <i>Eurobact2 was a prospective international cohort study, registered in ClinicalTrials.org (NCT03937245).</i></p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07857-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) are severe and require antibiotic therapy. In non-complicated BSIs, shortened therapy reduces side effects without compromising efficacy. The impact of shortened antibiotic therapy in HA-BSI critically ill patients without indication of prolonged therapy requires further evaluation.

Methods

Using the international prospective EUROBACT-2 cohort, we compared shortened (7–10 days) versus long (14–21 days) treatment durations in ICU patients eligible for shortened therapy. Patients without antibiotic therapy within 3 days after HA-BSI occurrence or requiring prolonged therapy (due to infection source, microorganism, or clinical deterioration) were excluded. Treatment failure, defined as death, persistent infection, or subsequent infectious complications by Day 28, was assessed using an inverse-probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) logistic regression.

Results

Among 2600 patients, 550 were eligible for shortened treatment, 213 received short, and 337 received long treatment. The most common infection source was intravascular catheters (33%), most common microorganisms were Enterobacterales (39%). Patients with long treatment were more frequently infected with Staphylococcus aureus (11% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.025) or difficult-to-treat microorganisms (23% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), and received more commonly combination therapy (46% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Short treatment was associated with reduced 28-day treatment failure (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93, p = 0.019), mainly due to reduction in subsequent infectious complications (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.91, p = 0.018). Mortality (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.59, 1.43], p = 0.7) and persistent infection rates (OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.17, 1.14], p = 0.12) were similar.

Conclusions

In selected ICU patients with HA-BSI, shortened antibiotic treatment might be considered. Eurobact2 was a prospective international cohort study, registered in ClinicalTrials.org (NCT03937245).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信