Opportunities and challenges for MRD assessment in the clinical management of multiple myeloma

IF 81.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Bruno Paiva, Qian Shi, Noemi Puig, Maria-Teresa Cedena, Alberto Orfao, Brian G. M. Durie, Nikhil C. Munshi, Jesús San-Miguel
{"title":"Opportunities and challenges for MRD assessment in the clinical management of multiple myeloma","authors":"Bruno Paiva, Qian Shi, Noemi Puig, Maria-Teresa Cedena, Alberto Orfao, Brian G. M. Durie, Nikhil C. Munshi, Jesús San-Miguel","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01017-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment is, from the methodological point of view, ready for prime time in multiple myeloma (MM). Abundant evidence underscores the value of MRD status determined using highly sensitive next-generation flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing tests in evaluating response to treatment and, therefore, prognosis in patients with this disease. MRD response assessment and monitoring might present a range of opportunities for individualized patient management. Moreover, the considerable amounts of high-quality and standardized MRD data generated in clinical trials have led to the acceptance of MRD negativity as an early end point for accelerated regulatory approval of treatments for MM. The data leave no doubt that the efficacy of new regimens in inducing deeper and durable MRD-negative responses is connected with prolonged survival. Yet, several evidential, technical and practical challenges continue to limit the implementation of MRD-guided treatment strategies in routine practice, and the use of MRD as a surrogate end point remains controversial to some. In this Review, we draw on past and present research to propose opportunities for overcoming some of these challenges, and to accelerate the use of MRD assessment for improved clinical management of patients with MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":81.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01017-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment is, from the methodological point of view, ready for prime time in multiple myeloma (MM). Abundant evidence underscores the value of MRD status determined using highly sensitive next-generation flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing tests in evaluating response to treatment and, therefore, prognosis in patients with this disease. MRD response assessment and monitoring might present a range of opportunities for individualized patient management. Moreover, the considerable amounts of high-quality and standardized MRD data generated in clinical trials have led to the acceptance of MRD negativity as an early end point for accelerated regulatory approval of treatments for MM. The data leave no doubt that the efficacy of new regimens in inducing deeper and durable MRD-negative responses is connected with prolonged survival. Yet, several evidential, technical and practical challenges continue to limit the implementation of MRD-guided treatment strategies in routine practice, and the use of MRD as a surrogate end point remains controversial to some. In this Review, we draw on past and present research to propose opportunities for overcoming some of these challenges, and to accelerate the use of MRD assessment for improved clinical management of patients with MM.

Abstract Image

MRD评估在多发性骨髓瘤临床治疗中的机遇与挑战
从方法学的角度来看,可测量的残留病(MRD)评估在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中已经准备好了。大量的证据强调了使用高灵敏度的下一代流式细胞术和下一代测序测试来确定MRD状态在评估治疗反应和患者预后方面的价值。MRD反应评估和监测可能为个体化患者管理提供一系列机会。此外,临床试验中产生的大量高质量和标准化的MRD数据已经导致接受MRD阴性作为加速MM治疗监管批准的早期终点。数据毫无疑问,新方案在诱导更深和持久的MRD阴性反应方面的功效与延长生存期有关。然而,一些证据,技术和实践方面的挑战继续限制MRD指导治疗策略在常规实践中的实施,并且使用MRD作为替代终点对一些人来说仍然存在争议。在这篇综述中,我们借鉴了过去和现在的研究,提出了克服这些挑战的机会,并加速MRD评估的使用,以改善MM患者的临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
99.40
自引率
0.40%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信