Identifying and preliminary validating patient clusters in coronary artery bypass grafting: integrating autonomic function with clinical and demographic data for personalized care.

Pavandeep Singh, Alberto Porta, Marco Ranucci, Beatrice Cairo, Francesca Gelpi, Rosario Caruso, Arianna Magon, Irene Baroni, Gianluca Conte, Vlasta Bari
{"title":"Identifying and preliminary validating patient clusters in coronary artery bypass grafting: integrating autonomic function with clinical and demographic data for personalized care.","authors":"Pavandeep Singh, Alberto Porta, Marco Ranucci, Beatrice Cairo, Francesca Gelpi, Rosario Caruso, Arianna Magon, Irene Baroni, Gianluca Conte, Vlasta Bari","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to identify distinct clusters of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based on demographic, clinical, and autonomic function characteristics and to validate these clusters.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Our cohort study included 154 subjects aged 18 years and older undergoing CABG, enrolled in Italy, from April 2017 to January 2020. Data were prospectively collected from pre-anesthesia induction to hospital discharge. Clustering was performed using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) on 23 variables and hierarchical clustering, including pre-and post-anesthesia autonomic function indices and demographic and clinical data. Two distinct clusters were identified: \"Higher Risk-Responsive Group\" and \"Lower Risk-Responsive Group.\" The Higher Risk-Responsive Group cluster consisted of older patients with higher comorbidity rates and worse autonomic function. Validation of clusters through multiple correspondence analysis and Poisson regression demonstrated significant differences in postoperative outcomes. Patients in the Lower Risk-Responsive Group cluster had fewer complications (IRR = 0.441, p=0.004). The analysis indicated that intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration and the power of systolic arterial pressure series in low-frequency band derived in the post-anesthesia phase were significant predictors of complications above and beyond the expected contributions of age and comorbidities, with longer ICU stays and lower low-frequency power of systolic arterial pressure post-anesthesia induction being associated with higher complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating autonomic function measures and demographic and clinical data could enhance patient monitoring and intervention, improving outcomes if included in future risk stratification tools and early warning score systems.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03169608.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to identify distinct clusters of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based on demographic, clinical, and autonomic function characteristics and to validate these clusters.

Methods and results: Our cohort study included 154 subjects aged 18 years and older undergoing CABG, enrolled in Italy, from April 2017 to January 2020. Data were prospectively collected from pre-anesthesia induction to hospital discharge. Clustering was performed using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) on 23 variables and hierarchical clustering, including pre-and post-anesthesia autonomic function indices and demographic and clinical data. Two distinct clusters were identified: "Higher Risk-Responsive Group" and "Lower Risk-Responsive Group." The Higher Risk-Responsive Group cluster consisted of older patients with higher comorbidity rates and worse autonomic function. Validation of clusters through multiple correspondence analysis and Poisson regression demonstrated significant differences in postoperative outcomes. Patients in the Lower Risk-Responsive Group cluster had fewer complications (IRR = 0.441, p=0.004). The analysis indicated that intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration and the power of systolic arterial pressure series in low-frequency band derived in the post-anesthesia phase were significant predictors of complications above and beyond the expected contributions of age and comorbidities, with longer ICU stays and lower low-frequency power of systolic arterial pressure post-anesthesia induction being associated with higher complication rates.

Conclusion: Integrating autonomic function measures and demographic and clinical data could enhance patient monitoring and intervention, improving outcomes if included in future risk stratification tools and early warning score systems.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03169608.

识别并初步验证冠状动脉旁路移植术患者集群:将自主神经功能与临床和人口统计学数据相结合,实现个性化护理。
目的:本研究旨在根据人口统计学、临床和自主神经功能特征确定接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的不同患者群,并对这些患者群进行验证。方法和结果:我们的队列研究纳入了2017年4月至2020年1月在意大利接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的154名18岁及以上受试者。前瞻性地收集从麻醉前诱导到出院的数据。采用t分布随机邻居嵌入(t-SNE)对麻醉前后自主神经功能指标、人口学和临床数据等23个变量进行分层聚类。确定了两个不同的集群:“高风险响应组”和“低风险响应组”。高风险反应组由合并症发生率较高、自主神经功能较差的老年患者组成。通过多重对应分析和泊松回归对聚类进行验证,发现术后结果存在显著差异。低风险反应组患者并发症发生率较低(IRR = 0.441, p=0.004)。分析表明,麻醉后重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和低频收缩压序列功率是超出年龄和合并症预期贡献的并发症的重要预测指标,麻醉诱导后ICU住院时间较长和收缩压低频功率较低与较高的并发症发生率相关。结论:将自主神经功能测量、人口学和临床数据整合到未来的风险分层工具和早期预警评分系统中,可以加强患者的监测和干预,改善预后。注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03169608。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信