[What do psychotherapists in training and patients think about psychotherapeutic competencies?]

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Wiebke Andersen, Anna Berning, Stefan Sell, Bernhard Strauß, Svenja Taubner
{"title":"[What do psychotherapists in training and patients think about psychotherapeutic competencies?]","authors":"Wiebke Andersen, Anna Berning, Stefan Sell, Bernhard Strauß, Svenja Taubner","doi":"10.1055/a-2553-1326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To promote the competence of psychotherapists in the long term, it is necessary to adapt the content of the training programs to the specific needs of those involved in therapy. The present study explores which therapeutic competence psychotherapy trainees and patients consider relevant. In addition, it examines the extent to which the understanding of competence aligns within therapist-patient pairs and the role this alignment plays in the therapeutic alliance.Psychotherapy trainees (N=58) and their patients (N=51) were asked two open-ended questions about important therapeutic competences and relevant aspects of a good therapeutic relationship. The answers were assigned to the competence categories of the contextual model by Anderson and Hill and the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS) by Anderson using a structuring content analysis. In addition, the relationship between the alignment in the answers of therapist-patient pairs and the therapeutic alliance (Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised) was examined.While relational competence was mentioned most frequently, cultural competence was missing in all responses. Some of the aspects mentioned could not be assigned to any competence field of the contextual model. Regarding a good therapeutic relationship, warmth, acceptance and understanding and alliance bond capacity were particularly emphasized. The alignment in the answers of the therapist-patient pairs was high on average. However, alignment and the therapeutic alliance did not show any significant correlation.The perspectives of the respondents were represented to varying degrees by the theoretical models. The importance of therapists' and patients' competence understanding for therapy needs to be further investigated. The results of the present study are consistent with previous research that shows relationship skills to be a central aspect of psychotherapy. For areas of competence that were missing from the respondents' answers, awareness should be raised specifically within training and further education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2553-1326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To promote the competence of psychotherapists in the long term, it is necessary to adapt the content of the training programs to the specific needs of those involved in therapy. The present study explores which therapeutic competence psychotherapy trainees and patients consider relevant. In addition, it examines the extent to which the understanding of competence aligns within therapist-patient pairs and the role this alignment plays in the therapeutic alliance.Psychotherapy trainees (N=58) and their patients (N=51) were asked two open-ended questions about important therapeutic competences and relevant aspects of a good therapeutic relationship. The answers were assigned to the competence categories of the contextual model by Anderson and Hill and the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS) by Anderson using a structuring content analysis. In addition, the relationship between the alignment in the answers of therapist-patient pairs and the therapeutic alliance (Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised) was examined.While relational competence was mentioned most frequently, cultural competence was missing in all responses. Some of the aspects mentioned could not be assigned to any competence field of the contextual model. Regarding a good therapeutic relationship, warmth, acceptance and understanding and alliance bond capacity were particularly emphasized. The alignment in the answers of the therapist-patient pairs was high on average. However, alignment and the therapeutic alliance did not show any significant correlation.The perspectives of the respondents were represented to varying degrees by the theoretical models. The importance of therapists' and patients' competence understanding for therapy needs to be further investigated. The results of the present study are consistent with previous research that shows relationship skills to be a central aspect of psychotherapy. For areas of competence that were missing from the respondents' answers, awareness should be raised specifically within training and further education.

接受培训的心理治疗师和患者如何看待心理治疗能力?]
为了长期提高心理治疗师的能力,有必要根据参与治疗者的具体需求调整培训课程的内容。本研究探讨了心理治疗学员和患者认为哪些治疗能力是相关的。心理治疗受训者(58 人)及其患者(51 人)被问及两个开放式问题,内容涉及重要的治疗能力和良好治疗关系的相关方面。通过结构化内容分析,这些答案被归入安德森和希尔的情境模型能力类别以及安德森的促进性人际关系技能(FIS)类别。此外,还研究了治疗师与患者对答中的一致性与治疗联盟(工作联盟量表--简易修订版)之间的关系。所提到的某些方面无法归入情境模型的任何能力领域。关于良好的治疗关系,特别强调了温暖、接纳和理解以及联盟纽带能力。平均而言,治疗师与患者之间的一致性较高。理论模型在不同程度上代表了受访者的观点。治疗师和患者的能力理解对治疗的重要性还有待进一步研究。本研究的结果与以往的研究结果一致,即关系技巧是心理治疗的一个核心方面。对于受访者回答中缺失的能力领域,应在培训和继续教育中特别提高对其的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信