Manual acupuncture enhanced therapeutic efficacy in vascular dementia rat model: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yuanyu Song, Yinghua Chen, Junfeng Li, Wei Sun, Fangfang Jin
{"title":"Manual acupuncture enhanced therapeutic efficacy in vascular dementia rat model: systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuanyu Song, Yinghua Chen, Junfeng Li, Wei Sun, Fangfang Jin","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02821-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture for treating vascular dementia and to determine the optimal acupuncture point combination scheme for efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang electronic databases were searched up to July 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 software and Addis software were used to assess the risk of bias for each study, determine subgroup classifications, and conduct meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 RCTs involving 659 animals were ultimately included. The meta-analysis results revealed that acupuncture treatment had a significant effect compared with the vascular dementia model group [mean difference (MD) = - 21.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) (- 25.77, - 17.59), P < 0.00001]. Manual acupuncture demonstrated better efficacy than electroacupuncture did [MD = - 0.42, 95% CI (- 12.72, 12.27)]. Among the different acupuncture point combinations, the Baihui (GV20) + Dazhui (GV14) combination yielded the best efficacy [MD = - 23.03, 95% CI (- 30.02, - 16.04), P < 0.00001]. Compared with other acupuncture protocols, the experiment conducted by Caiyu Peng et al. exhibited superior efficacy [MD = - 24.96, 95% CI (- 92.68, - 40.76)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acupuncture significantly improves cognitive function in rats with vascular dementia. Manual acupuncture is more effective than electroacupuncture. Among the different acupuncture point combinations, manual acupuncture at GV20 and GV14 yields the best results. Compared with other acupuncture protocols, the best efficacy was observed when the two-vessel occlusion (2VO) model was used in 230 ± 10 g SD rats; when the Mingmen (GV4), Dazhui (GV14), Fengfu (GV16), Baihui (GV20), Shenting (GV24), Shuigou (GV26), Neiguan (PC6), Dalin (PC7), and Laogong (PC8) acupoints were selected; and when manual acupuncture with reinforcing and reducing methods was used for 30 min per day for 14 days.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024551402.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02821-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture for treating vascular dementia and to determine the optimal acupuncture point combination scheme for efficacy.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang electronic databases were searched up to July 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 software and Addis software were used to assess the risk of bias for each study, determine subgroup classifications, and conduct meta-analyses.

Results: A total of 29 RCTs involving 659 animals were ultimately included. The meta-analysis results revealed that acupuncture treatment had a significant effect compared with the vascular dementia model group [mean difference (MD) = - 21.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) (- 25.77, - 17.59), P < 0.00001]. Manual acupuncture demonstrated better efficacy than electroacupuncture did [MD = - 0.42, 95% CI (- 12.72, 12.27)]. Among the different acupuncture point combinations, the Baihui (GV20) + Dazhui (GV14) combination yielded the best efficacy [MD = - 23.03, 95% CI (- 30.02, - 16.04), P < 0.00001]. Compared with other acupuncture protocols, the experiment conducted by Caiyu Peng et al. exhibited superior efficacy [MD = - 24.96, 95% CI (- 92.68, - 40.76)].

Conclusion: Acupuncture significantly improves cognitive function in rats with vascular dementia. Manual acupuncture is more effective than electroacupuncture. Among the different acupuncture point combinations, manual acupuncture at GV20 and GV14 yields the best results. Compared with other acupuncture protocols, the best efficacy was observed when the two-vessel occlusion (2VO) model was used in 230 ± 10 g SD rats; when the Mingmen (GV4), Dazhui (GV14), Fengfu (GV16), Baihui (GV20), Shenting (GV24), Shuigou (GV26), Neiguan (PC6), Dalin (PC7), and Laogong (PC8) acupoints were selected; and when manual acupuncture with reinforcing and reducing methods was used for 30 min per day for 14 days.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024551402.

针刺对血管性痴呆模型大鼠的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
研究目的本研究旨在系统评估电针和手针治疗血管性痴呆的疗效,并确定疗效最佳的穴位组合方案:方法:检索截至2024年7月的PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane、CNKI、VIP和万方等电子数据库,以确定相关的随机对照试验。使用RevMan 5.4软件和Addis软件评估每项研究的偏倚风险,确定亚组分类,并进行荟萃分析:最终共纳入了 29 项研究,涉及 659 只动物。荟萃分析结果显示,与血管性痴呆模型组相比,针灸治疗具有显著效果[平均差(MD)= - 21.68,95% 置信区间(CI)(- 25.77,- 17.59),P 结论:针灸能显著改善动物的认知能力:针灸能明显改善血管性痴呆大鼠的认知功能。手针比电针更有效。在不同的穴位组合中,手针 GV20 和 GV14 的效果最好。与其他针灸方案相比,在 230±10 克标本大鼠中使用双血管闭塞(2VO)模型时,疗效最佳;选择明门(GV4)、大椎(GV14)、风府(GV16)、百会(GV20)、神庭(GV24)、水沟(GV26)、内关(PC6)、大陵(PC7)和劳宫(PC8)等穴位;以及采用人工针刺并辅以加强和减弱方法,每天 30 分钟,连续 14 天。系统综述注册:ProCORMBERCO CRD42024551402。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信