Michal Frantisek Kriha , Jan Kamis , Marketa Dvorakova , Luc Tardy , Jana Elsterova , Dana Teislerova , Ales Chrdle , Martin Palus , Daniel Ruzek , Vaclav Hönig
{"title":"Detection of tick-borne encephalitis virus RNA in patient samples at different stages of infection","authors":"Michal Frantisek Kriha , Jan Kamis , Marketa Dvorakova , Luc Tardy , Jana Elsterova , Dana Teislerova , Ales Chrdle , Martin Palus , Daniel Ruzek , Vaclav Hönig","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of molecular diagnostics of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and to correlate viral RNA (vRNA) detection with the clinical and laboratory data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical samples from 1125 patients from South Bohemia, Czech Republic, a highly endemic TBE region, were screened for TBE virus (TBEV) RNA by RT-qPCR. Samples included blood, serum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and urine.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TBEV RNA was detected in 14 patients with clinically proven TBE. TBEV RNA was most frequently detected in sera during early infection (11/37 patients tested, 29.7%) but decreased with rising IgG antibody response (3/228, 1.3%). Detection in CSF and urine was infrequent (1/30, 3.3% and 1/52, 1.9%, respectively). Additionally, five patients initially not diagnosed with TBE were retrospectively found to have TBEV RNA in serum, indicating possible underdiagnosis, particularly in mild or atypical presentations. The study also highlighted the diagnostic challenge of an immunocompromised patient whose delayed antibody response hindered timely diagnosis. In such cases, RT-qPCR could significantly shorten the diagnostic timeline.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings underscore the value of early RNA detection in improving the diagnosis of TBE and may in the future facilitate the early administration of potential treatment, thereby improving patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"90 5","pages":"Article 106481"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445325000751","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of molecular diagnostics of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and to correlate viral RNA (vRNA) detection with the clinical and laboratory data.
Methods
Clinical samples from 1125 patients from South Bohemia, Czech Republic, a highly endemic TBE region, were screened for TBE virus (TBEV) RNA by RT-qPCR. Samples included blood, serum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and urine.
Results
TBEV RNA was detected in 14 patients with clinically proven TBE. TBEV RNA was most frequently detected in sera during early infection (11/37 patients tested, 29.7%) but decreased with rising IgG antibody response (3/228, 1.3%). Detection in CSF and urine was infrequent (1/30, 3.3% and 1/52, 1.9%, respectively). Additionally, five patients initially not diagnosed with TBE were retrospectively found to have TBEV RNA in serum, indicating possible underdiagnosis, particularly in mild or atypical presentations. The study also highlighted the diagnostic challenge of an immunocompromised patient whose delayed antibody response hindered timely diagnosis. In such cases, RT-qPCR could significantly shorten the diagnostic timeline.
Conclusions
These findings underscore the value of early RNA detection in improving the diagnosis of TBE and may in the future facilitate the early administration of potential treatment, thereby improving patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection.
Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.