Application of Behavioral Theory in Cooking Interventions Targeting Dietary Intake in Adults: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Anna C Tucker, Margaret Raber, Alice S Ammerman, Julia A Wolfson
{"title":"Application of Behavioral Theory in Cooking Interventions Targeting Dietary Intake in Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Anna C Tucker, Margaret Raber, Alice S Ammerman, Julia A Wolfson","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies of cooking interventions often state that behavioral theory was used to inform intervention development. However, to understand why interventions impact behavior change, it is crucial to understand how theory is used in the development, evaluation, and interpretation of interventions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a systematic review by searching PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL for articles published between January, 2000 and March, 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We considered studies involving adults aged > 18 years.</p><p><strong>Variables measured: </strong>Dietary intake was the primary outcome, and cooking behavior was the secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>We used the Theory Coding Scheme to assess theory use. We used descriptive statistics to summarize study characteristics and outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7,846 unique articles; 31 met the inclusion criteria. On average, studies met less than 6 of 17 criteria from the Theory Coding Scheme. The majority (65%) of interventions had a positive impact on at least 1 measure of dietary intake. However, more than half (55%) measured cooking behavior and only 41% of these reported a positive impact on cooking behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>These findings support the need for future studies to link intervention techniques with theoretical constructs and evaluate whether changes in constructs mediate improvements in dietary intake and cooking behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.02.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Studies of cooking interventions often state that behavioral theory was used to inform intervention development. However, to understand why interventions impact behavior change, it is crucial to understand how theory is used in the development, evaluation, and interpretation of interventions.

Design: We conducted a systematic review by searching PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL for articles published between January, 2000 and March, 2023.

Participants: We considered studies involving adults aged > 18 years.

Variables measured: Dietary intake was the primary outcome, and cooking behavior was the secondary outcome.

Analysis: We used the Theory Coding Scheme to assess theory use. We used descriptive statistics to summarize study characteristics and outcomes of interest.

Results: We identified 7,846 unique articles; 31 met the inclusion criteria. On average, studies met less than 6 of 17 criteria from the Theory Coding Scheme. The majority (65%) of interventions had a positive impact on at least 1 measure of dietary intake. However, more than half (55%) measured cooking behavior and only 41% of these reported a positive impact on cooking behavior.

Conclusions and implications: These findings support the need for future studies to link intervention techniques with theoretical constructs and evaluate whether changes in constructs mediate improvements in dietary intake and cooking behavior.

行为理论在针对成人饮食摄入的烹饪干预中的应用:系统综述。
目的:关于烹饪干预措施的研究通常会指出,在制定干预措施时使用了行为理论。然而,要了解干预措施影响行为改变的原因,关键是要了解在干预措施的开发、评估和解释中是如何使用理论的:设计:我们通过搜索 PubMed、Scopus 和 CINAHL 中 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月间发表的文章,进行了一次系统性综述:我们考虑了涉及 18 岁以上成年人的研究:饮食摄入量是主要结果,烹饪行为是次要结果:我们使用理论编码方案来评估理论的使用情况。我们使用描述性统计来总结研究特征和相关结果:我们确定了 7846 篇文章,其中 31 篇符合纳入标准。平均而言,符合理论编码方案 17 项标准的研究少于 6 项。大多数干预措施(65%)对至少一项膳食摄入量指标产生了积极影响。然而,超过一半(55%)的研究对烹饪行为进行了测量,其中只有 41% 的研究报告了对烹饪行为的积极影响:这些研究结果表明,今后的研究需要将干预技术与理论构架联系起来,并评估构架的变化是否对膳食摄入量和烹饪行为的改善起到中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信