Negative SA-VA difference during ventricular overdrive pacing of supraventricular tachycardia for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Raquel Adeliño, Víctor Bazán, Axel Sarrias, Jesús Jiménez-López, Júlia Aranyó, Felipe Bisbal, Joan F Andrés-Cordón, Julián Rodríguez-García, Pablo Jordán Marchite, Carlos Eduardo González-Matos, Roger Villuendas, Nuria Rivas-Gándara, Jesús Almendral
{"title":"Negative SA-VA difference during ventricular overdrive pacing of supraventricular tachycardia for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia.","authors":"Raquel Adeliño, Víctor Bazán, Axel Sarrias, Jesús Jiménez-López, Júlia Aranyó, Felipe Bisbal, Joan F Andrés-Cordón, Julián Rodríguez-García, Pablo Jordán Marchite, Carlos Eduardo González-Matos, Roger Villuendas, Nuria Rivas-Gándara, Jesús Almendral","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>The stimulus-atrial minus ventriculo-atrial interval (SA-VA difference) during ventricular overdrive pacing of a supraventricular tachycardia is used to differentiate atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), but positive values have always been reported. In atrial tachycardia, the SA conduction is unrelated to the tachycardia mechanism, allowing for negative SA-VA values. We postulated that a negative SA-VA may serve as a criterion for atrial tachycardia in patients with supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular overdrive pacing from the right ventricular apex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter data from ventricular overdrive pacing during atrial tachycardia (from 6 centers) and during AVRT and AVNRT (from 2 centers) were retrospectively and consecutively collected. The correct diagnosis was established using conventional criteria. The SA-VA difference was calculated for each case. The optimal SA-VA cut-off point for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 240 tachycardias analyzed, ventricular overdrive pacing succeeded in accelerating the atria to the pacing rate without tachycardia termination in 106 cases: 38 (36%) AVNRT, 33 (31%) AVRT, and 35 (33%) atrial tachycardias (all exhibiting long VA intervals). All atrial tachycardias had a negative SA-VA value, while all AVNRT and AVRT cases had positive SA-VA values. A SA-VA value lower than 0 ms was the best cutoff, with an area under the curve of 1 and 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A negative SA-VA difference is a novel and accurate criterion for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia with long VA intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.03.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: The stimulus-atrial minus ventriculo-atrial interval (SA-VA difference) during ventricular overdrive pacing of a supraventricular tachycardia is used to differentiate atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), but positive values have always been reported. In atrial tachycardia, the SA conduction is unrelated to the tachycardia mechanism, allowing for negative SA-VA values. We postulated that a negative SA-VA may serve as a criterion for atrial tachycardia in patients with supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular overdrive pacing from the right ventricular apex.

Methods: Multicenter data from ventricular overdrive pacing during atrial tachycardia (from 6 centers) and during AVRT and AVNRT (from 2 centers) were retrospectively and consecutively collected. The correct diagnosis was established using conventional criteria. The SA-VA difference was calculated for each case. The optimal SA-VA cut-off point for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia was determined.

Results: Out of 240 tachycardias analyzed, ventricular overdrive pacing succeeded in accelerating the atria to the pacing rate without tachycardia termination in 106 cases: 38 (36%) AVNRT, 33 (31%) AVRT, and 35 (33%) atrial tachycardias (all exhibiting long VA intervals). All atrial tachycardias had a negative SA-VA value, while all AVNRT and AVRT cases had positive SA-VA values. A SA-VA value lower than 0 ms was the best cutoff, with an area under the curve of 1 and 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia.

Conclusions: A negative SA-VA difference is a novel and accurate criterion for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia with long VA intervals.

室上性心动过速心室超速起搏时SA-VA阴性差异对房性心动过速的诊断价值。
导言和目的:在室上性心动过速的心室超速起搏过程中,刺激-心房间期减去心室-心房间期(SA-VA 差值)用于区分房室往复性心动过速(AVRT)和房室结再电位心动过速(AVNRT),但正值一直都有报道。在房性心动过速中,SA 传导与心动过速机制无关,因此 SA-VA 值为负值。我们推测,SA-VA 负值可作为室上性心动过速和右室心尖心室超速起搏患者房性心动过速的标准:回顾性连续收集了房性心动过速时心室超速起搏的多中心数据(来自 6 个中心)以及房室转复除颤和房室负性转复除颤时的多中心数据(来自 2 个中心)。采用传统标准确定正确诊断。计算每个病例的 SA-VA 差值。确定了诊断房性心动过速的最佳 SA-VA 临界点:结果:在分析的 240 例心动过速中,106 例心室超速起搏成功地将心房加速至起搏频率,但心动过速并未终止:其中有 38 例(36%)房室性心动过速、33 例(31%)房室性心动过速和 35 例(33%)房性心动过速(均表现出较长的 VA 间期)。所有房性心动过速的 SA-VA 值均为负值,而所有 AVNRT 和 AVRT 病例的 SA-VA 值均为正值。SA-VA值低于0毫秒是最佳临界值,曲线下面积为1,诊断房性心动过速的敏感性和特异性均为100%:结论:SA-VA 差值阴性是诊断长 VA 间期房性心动过速的一个新颖而准确的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信