Raquel Adeliño, Víctor Bazán, Axel Sarrias, Jesús Jiménez-López, Júlia Aranyó, Felipe Bisbal, Joan F Andrés-Cordón, Julián Rodríguez-García, Pablo Jordán Marchite, Carlos Eduardo González-Matos, Roger Villuendas, Nuria Rivas-Gándara, Jesús Almendral
{"title":"Negative SA-VA difference during ventricular overdrive pacing of supraventricular tachycardia for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia.","authors":"Raquel Adeliño, Víctor Bazán, Axel Sarrias, Jesús Jiménez-López, Júlia Aranyó, Felipe Bisbal, Joan F Andrés-Cordón, Julián Rodríguez-García, Pablo Jordán Marchite, Carlos Eduardo González-Matos, Roger Villuendas, Nuria Rivas-Gándara, Jesús Almendral","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>The stimulus-atrial minus ventriculo-atrial interval (SA-VA difference) during ventricular overdrive pacing of a supraventricular tachycardia is used to differentiate atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), but positive values have always been reported. In atrial tachycardia, the SA conduction is unrelated to the tachycardia mechanism, allowing for negative SA-VA values. We postulated that a negative SA-VA may serve as a criterion for atrial tachycardia in patients with supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular overdrive pacing from the right ventricular apex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter data from ventricular overdrive pacing during atrial tachycardia (from 6 centers) and during AVRT and AVNRT (from 2 centers) were retrospectively and consecutively collected. The correct diagnosis was established using conventional criteria. The SA-VA difference was calculated for each case. The optimal SA-VA cut-off point for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 240 tachycardias analyzed, ventricular overdrive pacing succeeded in accelerating the atria to the pacing rate without tachycardia termination in 106 cases: 38 (36%) AVNRT, 33 (31%) AVRT, and 35 (33%) atrial tachycardias (all exhibiting long VA intervals). All atrial tachycardias had a negative SA-VA value, while all AVNRT and AVRT cases had positive SA-VA values. A SA-VA value lower than 0 ms was the best cutoff, with an area under the curve of 1 and 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A negative SA-VA difference is a novel and accurate criterion for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia with long VA intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.03.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: The stimulus-atrial minus ventriculo-atrial interval (SA-VA difference) during ventricular overdrive pacing of a supraventricular tachycardia is used to differentiate atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), but positive values have always been reported. In atrial tachycardia, the SA conduction is unrelated to the tachycardia mechanism, allowing for negative SA-VA values. We postulated that a negative SA-VA may serve as a criterion for atrial tachycardia in patients with supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular overdrive pacing from the right ventricular apex.
Methods: Multicenter data from ventricular overdrive pacing during atrial tachycardia (from 6 centers) and during AVRT and AVNRT (from 2 centers) were retrospectively and consecutively collected. The correct diagnosis was established using conventional criteria. The SA-VA difference was calculated for each case. The optimal SA-VA cut-off point for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia was determined.
Results: Out of 240 tachycardias analyzed, ventricular overdrive pacing succeeded in accelerating the atria to the pacing rate without tachycardia termination in 106 cases: 38 (36%) AVNRT, 33 (31%) AVRT, and 35 (33%) atrial tachycardias (all exhibiting long VA intervals). All atrial tachycardias had a negative SA-VA value, while all AVNRT and AVRT cases had positive SA-VA values. A SA-VA value lower than 0 ms was the best cutoff, with an area under the curve of 1 and 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia.
Conclusions: A negative SA-VA difference is a novel and accurate criterion for the diagnosis of atrial tachycardia with long VA intervals.