The therapeutic alliance during remotely delivered therapy: A Delphi study with health professionals.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sam Tyrell, Sandra Bucci, Katherine Berry
{"title":"The therapeutic alliance during remotely delivered therapy: A Delphi study with health professionals.","authors":"Sam Tyrell, Sandra Bucci, Katherine Berry","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Delivering psychological therapy via videoconferencing and telephone is now commonplace across mental health services, but many therapists remain concerned about the impact on the therapeutic alliance. This study aimed to establish consensus amongst psychological therapists regarding the factors involved in establishing and maintaining the therapeutic alliance during remote therapy interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychological therapists from a range of professional backgrounds were invited to complete a three-Round Delphi survey online. Round 1 generated qualitative data which was used to develop a list of statements relating to key factors in establishing and maintaining alliance in therapy delivered over the telephone or videoconferencing. Participants were invited to rate their level of agreement with these statements in Rounds 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 149 participants who completed Round 1, 93 completed Round 2, and 71 participants completed all three Rounds. Following Round 3, a high level of agreement (above 80%) was obtained in relation to 31/63 statements reflecting communication style, contracting, quality and value, environment, emotional differences, effort, and technological aspects of engaging clients in this way. Participants reported similar views for therapies delivered via telephone and videoconferencing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinicians who have had to navigate the rapid rise in online delivery of therapy have valuable insights which warrant sharing amongst communities of practicing therapists and those in training. Identifying factors which therapists agree are important in developing alliances with patients remotely also guides researchers in identifying factors that warrant further investigation through empirical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Delivering psychological therapy via videoconferencing and telephone is now commonplace across mental health services, but many therapists remain concerned about the impact on the therapeutic alliance. This study aimed to establish consensus amongst psychological therapists regarding the factors involved in establishing and maintaining the therapeutic alliance during remote therapy interventions.

Methods: Psychological therapists from a range of professional backgrounds were invited to complete a three-Round Delphi survey online. Round 1 generated qualitative data which was used to develop a list of statements relating to key factors in establishing and maintaining alliance in therapy delivered over the telephone or videoconferencing. Participants were invited to rate their level of agreement with these statements in Rounds 2 and 3.

Results: Of the 149 participants who completed Round 1, 93 completed Round 2, and 71 participants completed all three Rounds. Following Round 3, a high level of agreement (above 80%) was obtained in relation to 31/63 statements reflecting communication style, contracting, quality and value, environment, emotional differences, effort, and technological aspects of engaging clients in this way. Participants reported similar views for therapies delivered via telephone and videoconferencing.

Discussion: Clinicians who have had to navigate the rapid rise in online delivery of therapy have valuable insights which warrant sharing amongst communities of practicing therapists and those in training. Identifying factors which therapists agree are important in developing alliances with patients remotely also guides researchers in identifying factors that warrant further investigation through empirical studies.

目的:目前,通过视频会议和电话提供心理治疗在心理健康服务中已司空见惯,但许多治疗师仍然担心这会对治疗联盟产生影响。本研究旨在就远程治疗干预过程中建立和维持治疗联盟的相关因素在心理治疗师之间达成共识:方法:邀请不同专业背景的心理治疗师在线完成三轮德尔菲调查。第一轮调查产生的定性数据被用于制定一份陈述清单,该清单涉及在电话或视频会议治疗中建立和维持治疗联盟的关键因素。第二轮和第三轮调查邀请参与者对这些陈述的同意程度进行评分:在完成第一轮的 149 名参与者中,93 人完成了第二轮,71 人完成了全部三轮。在第三轮中,31/63 项陈述获得了很高的同意度(80% 以上),这些陈述反映了以这种方式与客户接触的沟通方式、合同、质量和价值、环境、情感差异、努力和技术方面。对于通过电话和视频会议提供的治疗,参与者也有类似的看法:讨论:临床医生在网上治疗迅速兴起的过程中积累了宝贵的经验,值得在执业治疗师和接受培训的治疗师群体中分享。找出治疗师认为在与患者建立远程联盟方面非常重要的因素,也有助于研究人员找出值得通过实证研究进一步调查的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信