The effect of expanded access to mental health care on economic status of households with a person with a mental disorder in rural Ethiopia: a controlled before-after study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Yohannes Hailemichael, Damen Hailemariam, Kebede Tirfessa, Sumaiyah Docrat, Atalay Alem, Girmay Medhin, Abebaw Fekadu, Crick Lund, Dan Chisholm, Charlotte Hanlon
{"title":"The effect of expanded access to mental health care on economic status of households with a person with a mental disorder in rural Ethiopia: a controlled before-after study.","authors":"Yohannes Hailemichael, Damen Hailemariam, Kebede Tirfessa, Sumaiyah Docrat, Atalay Alem, Girmay Medhin, Abebaw Fekadu, Crick Lund, Dan Chisholm, Charlotte Hanlon","doi":"10.1186/s13033-025-00668-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poverty and mental illness are strongly associated. The aim of this study was to investigate the economic impact of implementing a district level integrated mental healthcare plan for people with severe mental disorders (SMD) and depression compared to secular trends in the general population in a rural Ethiopian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based, controlled before-after study design was used to assess changes in household economic status and catastrophic out-of-pocket (OOP) payments in relation to expanded access to mental health care. Two household samples were recruited, each with a community control group: (1) SMD sub-study and (2) depression sub-study. In the SMD sub-study, 290 households containing a member with SMD and 289 comparison households without a person with SMD participated. In the depression sub-study, 129 households with a person with depression and 129 comparison households. The case and comparison cohorts were followed up over 12 months. Propensity score matching and multivariable regression analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Provision of mental healthcare in the district was associated with a greater increase in income (Birr 919.53, 95% CI: 34.49, 4573.56) but no significant changes in consumption expenditure (Birr 176.25, 95% CI: -1338.19, 1690.70) in households of people with SMD compared to secular trends in comparison households. In households of people with depression, there was no significant change in income (Birr 227.78, 95% CI: -1361.21, 1816.79) or consumption expenditure (Birr - 81.20, 95% CI: -2572.57, 2410.15). The proportion of households incurring catastrophic OOP health expenditure (COOPHE) at the ≥ 10% and ≥ 40% thresholds were significantly reduced after the intervention in the SMD (from 20.3 to 9.0%, p = 0.002, and 31.9-14.9%, p < 0.001) and in the depression intervention (from 19.6 to 5.3%, p = 0.003, and 25.2-11.8%, p = 0.015). Similarly, COOPHE has declined in the comparison households for SMD (from 15.6% (T1) to 8.2% (T2) (p = 0.035) and for depression comparison households (from12.1-4.1%(p = 0.069). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of households experiencing catastrophic OOP health care expenditure in the SMD, depression and the comparison groups (p = 0.808 and p = 0.779 ). Despite improvement in income and COOPHE, households of persons with SMD or depression remained impoverished relative to comparison groups at follow-up. Households of people with SMD and depression were significantly less likely to be enrolled in community-based health insurance (CBHI) than comparison households.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The District mental health care plan intervention increased household income and reduced catastrophic out-of- pocket payment. Our findings support global initiatives to scale up mental healthcare as part of universal health coverage initiatives, alongside interventions to support social inclusion and targeted financial protection for vulnerable households.</p>","PeriodicalId":47752,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-025-00668-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Poverty and mental illness are strongly associated. The aim of this study was to investigate the economic impact of implementing a district level integrated mental healthcare plan for people with severe mental disorders (SMD) and depression compared to secular trends in the general population in a rural Ethiopian setting.

Methods: A community-based, controlled before-after study design was used to assess changes in household economic status and catastrophic out-of-pocket (OOP) payments in relation to expanded access to mental health care. Two household samples were recruited, each with a community control group: (1) SMD sub-study and (2) depression sub-study. In the SMD sub-study, 290 households containing a member with SMD and 289 comparison households without a person with SMD participated. In the depression sub-study, 129 households with a person with depression and 129 comparison households. The case and comparison cohorts were followed up over 12 months. Propensity score matching and multivariable regression analyses were conducted.

Results: Provision of mental healthcare in the district was associated with a greater increase in income (Birr 919.53, 95% CI: 34.49, 4573.56) but no significant changes in consumption expenditure (Birr 176.25, 95% CI: -1338.19, 1690.70) in households of people with SMD compared to secular trends in comparison households. In households of people with depression, there was no significant change in income (Birr 227.78, 95% CI: -1361.21, 1816.79) or consumption expenditure (Birr - 81.20, 95% CI: -2572.57, 2410.15). The proportion of households incurring catastrophic OOP health expenditure (COOPHE) at the ≥ 10% and ≥ 40% thresholds were significantly reduced after the intervention in the SMD (from 20.3 to 9.0%, p = 0.002, and 31.9-14.9%, p < 0.001) and in the depression intervention (from 19.6 to 5.3%, p = 0.003, and 25.2-11.8%, p = 0.015). Similarly, COOPHE has declined in the comparison households for SMD (from 15.6% (T1) to 8.2% (T2) (p = 0.035) and for depression comparison households (from12.1-4.1%(p = 0.069). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of households experiencing catastrophic OOP health care expenditure in the SMD, depression and the comparison groups (p = 0.808 and p = 0.779 ). Despite improvement in income and COOPHE, households of persons with SMD or depression remained impoverished relative to comparison groups at follow-up. Households of people with SMD and depression were significantly less likely to be enrolled in community-based health insurance (CBHI) than comparison households.

Conclusions: The District mental health care plan intervention increased household income and reduced catastrophic out-of- pocket payment. Our findings support global initiatives to scale up mental healthcare as part of universal health coverage initiatives, alongside interventions to support social inclusion and targeted financial protection for vulnerable households.

扩大获得精神保健的机会对埃塞俄比亚农村有精神障碍患者家庭经济状况的影响:一项前后对照研究。
背景:贫困与精神疾病密切相关。本研究的目的是调查在埃塞俄比亚农村地区针对严重精神障碍(SMD)和抑郁症患者实施地区级综合精神保健计划对经济的影响,并与普通人群的长期趋势进行比较:方法:采用基于社区的前后对照研究设计,评估家庭经济状况和灾难性自付费用(OOP)的变化与扩大精神卫生保健服务范围的关系。招募了两个家庭样本,每个样本都有一个社区对照组:(1) SMD 子研究和 (2) 抑郁症子研究。在 SMD 子研究中,290 个有 SMD 成员的家庭和 289 个没有 SMD 患者的对比家庭参与了研究。在抑郁症子研究中,有 129 个家庭的成员患有抑郁症,129 个对比家庭的成员患有抑郁症。对病例组和对比组进行了为期 12 个月的随访。研究进行了倾向得分匹配和多变量回归分析:结果:与对比家庭的长期趋势相比,在该地区提供精神保健服务与抑郁症患者家庭的收入增加(919.53 比尔,95% CI:34.49,4573.56)有关,但消费支出(176.25 比尔,95% CI:-1338.19,1690.70)没有显著变化。抑郁症患者家庭的收入(227.78 比尔,95% CI:-1361.21,1816.79)和消费支出(-81.20 比尔,95% CI:-2572.57,2410.15)均无明显变化。在 SMD 干预后,发生灾难性 OOP 医疗支出(COOPHE)≥10% 和≥40% 临界值的家庭比例显著降低(从 20.3% 降至 9.0%,P = 0.002;从 31.9% 降至 14.9%,P 结论):地区心理保健计划干预增加了家庭收入,减少了灾难性自费支出。我们的研究结果支持将心理保健作为全民医保倡议的一部分加以推广的全球倡议,以及支持社会包容和为弱势家庭提供有针对性的财务保护的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信