Between empowerment, patronization, and surveillance. A semi-structured interview study with persons with dementia and family caregivers on the empowering opportunities and perils of intelligent assistive technologies.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Clara Löbe, Niklas Petersen
{"title":"Between empowerment, patronization, and surveillance. A semi-structured interview study with persons with dementia and family caregivers on the empowering opportunities and perils of intelligent assistive technologies.","authors":"Clara Löbe, Niklas Petersen","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01203-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intelligent assistive technology (IAT) can contribute to the empowerment of persons with dementia by increasing independence, strengthening social participation, and improving quality of life. IAT could, however, also create new dependencies, reinforce power asymmetries, perpetuate stigmatization, and invade the privacy of persons living with dementia. To fulfill the empowering promise of new technologies and design a user-friendly IAT, users'perspectives, needs, capabilities and interests should be incorporated into IAT development and implementation from an early stage. Yet, the development and ethical assessment of IAT still tends to neglect the perspectives of potential user groups. This study explores how persons with dementia and their caregivers assess the empowering potential, opportunities, and risks of IAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 27 semi-structured interviews with persons with dementia (12) and their caregivers (15). Three technologies (GPS bracelet, dressing technology, and emotion recognition technology) were presented in the interviews using fictional case vignettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Persons with dementia and their caregivers generally believe that IAT can potentially empower persons with dementia by improving their independence in performing daily tasks, supporting their independent mobility, increasing their physical and emotional sense of safety, and improving their social participation. The risks they identify include violations of privacy, patronization through technology, lack of user specificity, and insufficient everyday usability. Technologies are viewed very differently depending on the context, purpose of use, and user group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IATs seem to have the potential to empower persons with dementia, but risks and benefits are perceived differently by the interviewees. The technology's usefulness depends on adapting to users' needs, capabilities, and interests. Future studies using a participatory approach that includes user preferences from the outset could lead to more user-centered technologies that promote the empowerment of persons with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01203-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intelligent assistive technology (IAT) can contribute to the empowerment of persons with dementia by increasing independence, strengthening social participation, and improving quality of life. IAT could, however, also create new dependencies, reinforce power asymmetries, perpetuate stigmatization, and invade the privacy of persons living with dementia. To fulfill the empowering promise of new technologies and design a user-friendly IAT, users'perspectives, needs, capabilities and interests should be incorporated into IAT development and implementation from an early stage. Yet, the development and ethical assessment of IAT still tends to neglect the perspectives of potential user groups. This study explores how persons with dementia and their caregivers assess the empowering potential, opportunities, and risks of IAT.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 27 semi-structured interviews with persons with dementia (12) and their caregivers (15). Three technologies (GPS bracelet, dressing technology, and emotion recognition technology) were presented in the interviews using fictional case vignettes.

Results: Persons with dementia and their caregivers generally believe that IAT can potentially empower persons with dementia by improving their independence in performing daily tasks, supporting their independent mobility, increasing their physical and emotional sense of safety, and improving their social participation. The risks they identify include violations of privacy, patronization through technology, lack of user specificity, and insufficient everyday usability. Technologies are viewed very differently depending on the context, purpose of use, and user group.

Conclusion: IATs seem to have the potential to empower persons with dementia, but risks and benefits are perceived differently by the interviewees. The technology's usefulness depends on adapting to users' needs, capabilities, and interests. Future studies using a participatory approach that includes user preferences from the outset could lead to more user-centered technologies that promote the empowerment of persons with dementia.

在授权,光顾和监视之间。一项针对痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者的半结构化访谈研究,探讨智能辅助技术的赋权机会和风险。
背景:智能辅助技术(IAT)可以通过增加独立性、加强社会参与和改善生活质量来促进痴呆症患者的赋权。然而,IAT也可能产生新的依赖,加强权力不对称,使污名永久化,并侵犯痴呆症患者的隐私。为了实现新技术的授权承诺并设计一个用户友好的IAT,用户的观点、需求、能力和兴趣应该从早期阶段就纳入IAT的开发和实施。然而,IAT的发展和伦理评估仍然倾向于忽视潜在用户群体的观点。本研究探讨了痴呆症患者及其护理人员如何评估IAT的赋权潜力、机会和风险。方法:我们对27名痴呆患者(12名)及其照顾者(15名)进行了半结构化访谈,并进行了定性内容分析。三种技术(GPS手环、穿衣技术和情感识别技术)在访谈中以虚构案例的形式呈现。结果:痴呆症患者及其护理人员普遍认为,IAT可以通过提高痴呆症患者在执行日常任务时的独立性,支持他们的独立行动能力,增加他们的身体和情感安全感,以及提高他们的社会参与能力,从而潜在地增强痴呆症患者的能力。他们确定的风险包括侵犯隐私、通过技术进行光顾、缺乏用户特异性以及日常可用性不足。根据上下文、使用目的和用户组,对技术的看法非常不同。结论:人工智能似乎有可能增强痴呆症患者的能力,但受访者对风险和收益的看法不同。技术的有用性取决于能否适应用户的需求、能力和兴趣。未来的研究采用参与式方法,从一开始就包括用户偏好,这可能会导致更多以用户为中心的技术,从而促进痴呆症患者的赋权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信