Government response to the increase in gender-based violence during the pandemic in Canada: Lessons for addressing inequity in emergency management practice.

Q3 Medicine
Jean Slick
{"title":"Government response to the increase in gender-based violence during the pandemic in Canada: Lessons for addressing inequity in emergency management practice.","authors":"Jean Slick","doi":"10.5055/jem.0881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A harmful untended consequence of the protective public health orders issued during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was an increase in gender-based violence (GBV). This study examined the response of federal, provincial, and territorial governments in Canada to GBV during the peak of the pandemic (between February 2020 and October 2021) through a review of relevant media releases. These documents were then assessed for evidence of effective crisis leadership and compared to established international guidance for addressing GBV in disasters and other humanitarian emergencies. Five major themes emerged from the media review with respect to government communications and actions. First, governments announced funding to organizations working in the domestic violence sector to help support their ability to adapt their services during the pandemic. Second, media releases described efforts undertaken by governments to expand several different types of support services for victims of GBV. Third, governments promoted awareness of the ongoing problem of GBV, as well as its increase during the pandemic. Fourth, government communications acknowledged heightened risk for some populations, including Indigenous women, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex populations, and those at risk of human trafficking. Fifth, legislative and policy changes were announced by some governments during the pandemic. An analysis of the timing of communications suggests that only the federal government and one third of provinces and territories took early action to address the increase in GBV during the pandemic, which is consistent with international guidance that calls for the use of the precautionary principle. Most of the governments responded to the GBV crisis late or not at all. Although the analysis of media releases alone is insufficient to establish the scope of government actions taken to address GBV during the pandemic, public communication related to ongoing threats is an expected crisis communication competency. This study offers recommendations for practice, which might help address gender inequity in disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"23 2","pages":"287-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A harmful untended consequence of the protective public health orders issued during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was an increase in gender-based violence (GBV). This study examined the response of federal, provincial, and territorial governments in Canada to GBV during the peak of the pandemic (between February 2020 and October 2021) through a review of relevant media releases. These documents were then assessed for evidence of effective crisis leadership and compared to established international guidance for addressing GBV in disasters and other humanitarian emergencies. Five major themes emerged from the media review with respect to government communications and actions. First, governments announced funding to organizations working in the domestic violence sector to help support their ability to adapt their services during the pandemic. Second, media releases described efforts undertaken by governments to expand several different types of support services for victims of GBV. Third, governments promoted awareness of the ongoing problem of GBV, as well as its increase during the pandemic. Fourth, government communications acknowledged heightened risk for some populations, including Indigenous women, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex populations, and those at risk of human trafficking. Fifth, legislative and policy changes were announced by some governments during the pandemic. An analysis of the timing of communications suggests that only the federal government and one third of provinces and territories took early action to address the increase in GBV during the pandemic, which is consistent with international guidance that calls for the use of the precautionary principle. Most of the governments responded to the GBV crisis late or not at all. Although the analysis of media releases alone is insufficient to establish the scope of government actions taken to address GBV during the pandemic, public communication related to ongoing threats is an expected crisis communication competency. This study offers recommendations for practice, which might help address gender inequity in disasters.

政府对加拿大疫情期间性别暴力增加的反应:解决应急管理实践中不平等问题的经验教训。
2019年冠状病毒大流行期间发布的保护性公共卫生令的一个有害的意外后果是基于性别的暴力(GBV)的增加。本研究通过审查相关媒体发布,审查了加拿大联邦、省和地区政府在大流行高峰期(2020年2月至2021年10月)对性别暴力的反应。然后对这些文件进行评估,以确定有效的危机领导证据,并与解决灾害和其他人道主义紧急情况中性别暴力的既定国际指南进行比较。关于政府的通讯和行动,媒体审查产生了五个主要主题。首先,各国政府宣布向从事家庭暴力部门工作的组织提供资金,以帮助支持它们在大流行期间调整其服务的能力。第二,媒体报道描述了政府为扩大对性别暴力受害者的几种不同类型的支持服务所做的努力。第三,各国政府提高了对性别暴力这一持续存在的问题的认识,以及这一问题在大流行期间的增加。第四,政府来文承认一些人群的风险增加,包括土著妇女、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿和双性人,以及面临人口贩运风险的人群。第五,一些政府在疫情期间宣布了立法和政策变化。对通报时间的分析表明,只有联邦政府和三分之一的省和地区在大流行期间采取了早期行动,以解决性别暴力增加的问题,这符合要求使用预防原则的国际指导。大多数政府对性别暴力危机的反应都很晚,或者根本没有。虽然仅对媒体发布的分析不足以确定政府在大流行期间为解决基于性别的暴力问题而采取的行动的范围,但与持续威胁有关的公共传播是一种预期的危机传播能力。这项研究为实践提供了建议,可能有助于解决灾害中的性别不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信