Deep learning prediction of mammographic breast density using screening data.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Chen Chen, Enyu Wang, Vicky Yang Wang, Xiayi Chen, Bojian Feng, Ruxuan Yan, Lingying Zhu, Dong Xu
{"title":"Deep learning prediction of mammographic breast density using screening data.","authors":"Chen Chen, Enyu Wang, Vicky Yang Wang, Xiayi Chen, Bojian Feng, Ruxuan Yan, Lingying Zhu, Dong Xu","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-95275-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated a series of deep learning (DL) models for the objective assessment of four categories of mammographic breast density (e.g., fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense). A retrospective analysis was conducted using data collected from Taizhou Cancer Hospital over a period from January 2015 to December 2020. The dataset included mammograms from 9,621 women, totaling 57,282 images. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of 7:2:1. Four DL models were employed, with Average Precision (AP) served as the primary evaluation metric. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of the DL models was compared with that of radiologists. Finally, we conducted validation of our model using an external test set. Among the DL models studied, InceptionV3 performed best, with AP values of 0.895 for almost entirely fatty, 0.857 for scattered fibroglandular tissue, 0.953 for heterogeneously dense, and 0.952 for extremely dense categories. The InceptionV3 model outperformed radiologists in accuracy and consistency. While radiologists surpassed the InceptionV3 model in fatty and scattered categories, their accuracy dropped significantly in heterogeneously and extremely dense categories. Nevertheless, our study demonstrated that DL can serve as a valuate tool in assisting radiologists with the objective quantification of breast density.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95275-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated a series of deep learning (DL) models for the objective assessment of four categories of mammographic breast density (e.g., fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense). A retrospective analysis was conducted using data collected from Taizhou Cancer Hospital over a period from January 2015 to December 2020. The dataset included mammograms from 9,621 women, totaling 57,282 images. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of 7:2:1. Four DL models were employed, with Average Precision (AP) served as the primary evaluation metric. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of the DL models was compared with that of radiologists. Finally, we conducted validation of our model using an external test set. Among the DL models studied, InceptionV3 performed best, with AP values of 0.895 for almost entirely fatty, 0.857 for scattered fibroglandular tissue, 0.953 for heterogeneously dense, and 0.952 for extremely dense categories. The InceptionV3 model outperformed radiologists in accuracy and consistency. While radiologists surpassed the InceptionV3 model in fatty and scattered categories, their accuracy dropped significantly in heterogeneously and extremely dense categories. Nevertheless, our study demonstrated that DL can serve as a valuate tool in assisting radiologists with the objective quantification of breast density.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用筛查数据的乳房x线摄影乳房密度深度学习预测。
本研究研究了一系列深度学习(DL)模型,用于客观评估四类乳腺X线摄影乳腺密度(如脂肪型、散在型、异质致密型和极致密型)。我们利用从台州市肿瘤医院收集的数据进行了回顾性分析,时间跨度为 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月。数据集包括9621名女性的乳房X光照片,共计57282张图像。数据集按 7:2:1 的比例分为训练集、验证集和测试集。采用了四种 DL 模型,以平均精度(Average Precision,AP)作为主要评估指标。此外,我们还将 DL 模型的诊断性能与放射科医生的诊断性能进行了比较。最后,我们使用外部测试集对我们的模型进行了验证。在所研究的 DL 模型中,InceptionV3 的表现最好,几乎完全为脂肪组织的 AP 值为 0.895,散在纤维腺组织的 AP 值为 0.857,异质性致密的 AP 值为 0.953,极致密类别的 AP 值为 0.952。InceptionV3 模型在准确性和一致性方面均优于放射科医生。虽然放射科医生在脂肪和散在类别中的准确性超过了 InceptionV3 模型,但在异质致密和极致密类别中的准确性却明显下降。不过,我们的研究表明,DL 可以作为一种有价值的工具,协助放射科医生对乳腺密度进行客观量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信