Engaging communities in the planning process: Conducting formative research for a web-based food distribution platform in a post-disaster setting.

Q3 Medicine
Elizabeth A Dunn, Kayleigh Murray, Maria Paula Ibarcena Woll, Leomar White, Hannah Harburg, Rashida Jones, Kaiqi Xiong, Ran Tao
{"title":"Engaging communities in the planning process: Conducting formative research for a web-based food distribution platform in a post-disaster setting.","authors":"Elizabeth A Dunn, Kayleigh Murray, Maria Paula Ibarcena Woll, Leomar White, Hannah Harburg, Rashida Jones, Kaiqi Xiong, Ran Tao","doi":"10.5055/jem.0879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As natural hazards amplify the persistence of food insecurity, the demand for evidence-informed interventions that increase resilience is needed. Developing a decentralized web-based platform to mobilize healthy food options in disaster-affected neighborhoods, designed to use real-time crowdsourced information, can help identify vulnerable populations and prioritize areas in need. A survey was administered using constructs from the Health Belief Model and Technology Accessibility Model, engaging Hillsborough County residents in the design thinking process to gauge community acceptance of a technology-based intervention during a large-scale disaster. Identifying barriers, wants, and needs of various population segments allows for more inclusive strategies for developing emergency management interventions. Results from the community survey validated the high likelihood of technology acceptance during disasters, with 90.9 percent of the respondents indicating that they would likely use a web-based food delivery service during disasters. Respondents had high levels of perceived self-efficacy and perceived ease of use with moderate levels of perceived usefulness and perceived threats. A majority of respondents (81.4 percent) agree that technology helps connect them to their community, with 83.6 percent agreeing that the internet would be useful for helping their community and 70.2 percent indicating they would feel comfortable ordering groceries online during a disaster. Whereas Hispanic survey respondents had higher levels of perceived threats; however, due to their perceived barriers were less likely to use the platform. By incorporating evidence-informed disaster management practices in the planning process, local governmental and nongovernmental organizations can develop more comprehensive plans and interventions to help communities prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"23 2","pages":"235-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As natural hazards amplify the persistence of food insecurity, the demand for evidence-informed interventions that increase resilience is needed. Developing a decentralized web-based platform to mobilize healthy food options in disaster-affected neighborhoods, designed to use real-time crowdsourced information, can help identify vulnerable populations and prioritize areas in need. A survey was administered using constructs from the Health Belief Model and Technology Accessibility Model, engaging Hillsborough County residents in the design thinking process to gauge community acceptance of a technology-based intervention during a large-scale disaster. Identifying barriers, wants, and needs of various population segments allows for more inclusive strategies for developing emergency management interventions. Results from the community survey validated the high likelihood of technology acceptance during disasters, with 90.9 percent of the respondents indicating that they would likely use a web-based food delivery service during disasters. Respondents had high levels of perceived self-efficacy and perceived ease of use with moderate levels of perceived usefulness and perceived threats. A majority of respondents (81.4 percent) agree that technology helps connect them to their community, with 83.6 percent agreeing that the internet would be useful for helping their community and 70.2 percent indicating they would feel comfortable ordering groceries online during a disaster. Whereas Hispanic survey respondents had higher levels of perceived threats; however, due to their perceived barriers were less likely to use the platform. By incorporating evidence-informed disaster management practices in the planning process, local governmental and nongovernmental organizations can develop more comprehensive plans and interventions to help communities prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters.

让社区参与规划过程:为灾后环境下基于网络的粮食分配平台开展形成性研究。
由于自然灾害加剧了粮食不安全的持续存在,因此需要采取循证干预措施,提高抵御力。开发一个分散的基于网络的平台,利用实时众包信息,在受灾社区动员健康食品选择,有助于确定弱势群体并确定有需要的地区的优先次序。采用健康信念模型和技术可及性模型的结构进行调查,让希尔斯堡县居民参与设计思维过程,以衡量社区对大规模灾害中基于技术的干预的接受程度。确定各种人口群体的障碍、愿望和需求,有助于制定更具包容性的应急管理干预措施战略。社区调查的结果证实了灾害期间接受技术的可能性很高,90.9%的受访者表示他们可能会在灾害期间使用基于网络的食品配送服务。被调查者有高水平的自我效能感和易用性,中等水平的有用性和威胁性。大多数受访者(81.4%)认为技术有助于他们与社区联系起来,83.6%的人认为互联网有助于帮助他们的社区,70.2%的人表示他们在灾难期间会在网上订购杂货。而西班牙裔受访者对威胁的感知水平更高;然而,由于他们感知到的障碍,他们不太可能使用这个平台。通过将基于证据的灾害管理实践纳入规划过程,地方政府和非政府组织可以制定更全面的计划和干预措施,帮助社区为灾害做好准备、做出反应并从灾害中恢复过来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信