Disability-inclusive data collection and survey outcomes that reflect the lived experiences of people with disabilities in emergencies or disasters.

Q3 Medicine
Dawn Skaggs, Katherine Sanches
{"title":"Disability-inclusive data collection and survey outcomes that reflect the lived experiences of people with disabilities in emergencies or disasters.","authors":"Dawn Skaggs, Katherine Sanches","doi":"10.5055/jem.0889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article documents a disability-inclusive study conducted in partnership with disabilityled -community-based organizations in survey development and distribution. Information collection focused on the lived experiences of people with disabilities, their perceived impact, and their future expectations. Survey results from 413 individuals with disabilities document the disaster or personal crisis-related experiences and their subsequent impacts. Results from a selection of survey questions were identified for further exploration and their potential impact on disability-inclusive planning, response, and recovery, with a view to identifying potential variables that impact the disproportionate impact of disasters on people with disabilities. Perspectives provided by survey respondents, who were exclusively people with disabilities, overlapped with but did not necessarily align with what is known about emergency and disaster response systems. Study outcomes supported current recommended practices for inclusive planning with people with disabilities. The study supports the premise that accessibility, programmatic inclusion, and effective communication impact the lived experience of people with disabilities in disasters and warrant additional inquiry. Furthermore, the equitable and valued involvement of people with disabilities and disabilityled organizations is essential in disaster research, policy, and practice that does not leave anyone behind. Research can, and should, be conducted in coordination with disability stakeholders and people with disabilities in order to generate useful and implementable policy and practice information. This inclusive approach should take priority over rigorous academic research methods and standards for principled and practical -considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"23 2","pages":"161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article documents a disability-inclusive study conducted in partnership with disabilityled -community-based organizations in survey development and distribution. Information collection focused on the lived experiences of people with disabilities, their perceived impact, and their future expectations. Survey results from 413 individuals with disabilities document the disaster or personal crisis-related experiences and their subsequent impacts. Results from a selection of survey questions were identified for further exploration and their potential impact on disability-inclusive planning, response, and recovery, with a view to identifying potential variables that impact the disproportionate impact of disasters on people with disabilities. Perspectives provided by survey respondents, who were exclusively people with disabilities, overlapped with but did not necessarily align with what is known about emergency and disaster response systems. Study outcomes supported current recommended practices for inclusive planning with people with disabilities. The study supports the premise that accessibility, programmatic inclusion, and effective communication impact the lived experience of people with disabilities in disasters and warrant additional inquiry. Furthermore, the equitable and valued involvement of people with disabilities and disabilityled organizations is essential in disaster research, policy, and practice that does not leave anyone behind. Research can, and should, be conducted in coordination with disability stakeholders and people with disabilities in order to generate useful and implementable policy and practice information. This inclusive approach should take priority over rigorous academic research methods and standards for principled and practical -considerations.

包容残疾的数据收集和调查结果,反映残疾人在紧急情况或灾害中的生活经历。
这篇文章记录了一项与残疾人社区组织合作开展的兼顾残疾人的研究,该研究涉及调查问卷的开发和分发。信息收集的重点是残疾人的生活经历、他们所感受到的影响以及他们对未来的期望。来自 413 名残疾人的调查结果记录了与灾难或个人危机相关的经历及其后续影响。我们对部分调查问题的结果进行了深入探讨,以确定其对兼顾残疾问题的规划、响应和恢复工作的潜在影响,从而找出影响灾害对残疾人造成过大影响的潜在变量。调查对象全部为残疾人,他们的观点与人们对应急和救灾系统的了解有重叠之处,但并不一定一致。研究结果支持当前推荐的残疾人包容性规划做法。这项研究支持这样一个前提,即无障碍环境、计划包容性和有效沟通会影响残疾人在灾难中的生活体验,因此需要进行更多的调查。此外,残障人士和残障组织的公平、有价值的参与对于不遗漏任何人的灾难研究、政策和实践至关重要。研究可以、也应该与残疾利益相关者和残疾人协调进行,以产生有用的、可执行的政策和实践信息。出于原则性和实用性的考虑,这种包容性的方法应优先于严谨的学术研究方法和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信