Rate of change in upper and lower motor neuron burden is associated with survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
A Maranzano, F Gentile, M Passaretti, A Doretti, E Colombo, A K Wall, M Treddenti, V Patisso, A De Lorenzo, C Gendarini, A Cocuzza, A D Maio, S Pierro, B Poletti, C M Cinnante, C Morelli, S Messina, J B Pereira, O Hardiman, V Silani, F Verde, N Ticozzi
{"title":"Rate of change in upper and lower motor neuron burden is associated with survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.","authors":"A Maranzano, F Gentile, M Passaretti, A Doretti, E Colombo, A K Wall, M Treddenti, V Patisso, A De Lorenzo, C Gendarini, A Cocuzza, A D Maio, S Pierro, B Poletti, C M Cinnante, C Morelli, S Messina, J B Pereira, O Hardiman, V Silani, F Verde, N Ticozzi","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13052-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesize that the rate of change in upper (ΔUMN) and lower (ΔLMN) motor neuron signs from symptom onset to first clinical assessment represent best predictors of survival and disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared to singular quantification of UMN and LMN involvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective inpatient cohort of 1000 ALS patients was evaluated. The burden of UMN and LMN signs was assessed using the Penn Upper Motor Neuron Score and Lower Motor Neuron Score, respectively. For 421 patients, we compute the ENCALS survival model. Univariate and regularized Cox regressions were conducted to estimate the effect of the aforementioned variables on survival. The ROC curve analysis was then employed to a training sub-cohort to identify a ΔLMN cut-off value discriminating ALS patients with prolonged vs short survival. This cut-off value was then cross validated on a test sub-cohort. A multinomial regression model was used to compare different ΔUMN and ΔLMN scores among ENCALS groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔUMN and ΔLMN showed a negative association with survival (ΔUMN: HR = 1.30; ΔLMN: HR = 4.22). A cut-off value of 0.22 for ΔLMN was identified to predict patients with estimated short vs prolonged survival. ENCALS groups characterized by shorter survival presented significantly higher ΔUMN and ΔLMN scores compared to those with longer survival. No significant association of PUMNS or LMNS gross scores with the above-mentioned variables was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By reflecting the progressing degeneration of the two distinct motor neuron subpopulations, ΔUMN and ΔLMN might represent reliable and easily measurable clinical indexes to estimate survival in ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 4","pages":"315"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13052-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We hypothesize that the rate of change in upper (ΔUMN) and lower (ΔLMN) motor neuron signs from symptom onset to first clinical assessment represent best predictors of survival and disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared to singular quantification of UMN and LMN involvement.

Methods: A retrospective inpatient cohort of 1000 ALS patients was evaluated. The burden of UMN and LMN signs was assessed using the Penn Upper Motor Neuron Score and Lower Motor Neuron Score, respectively. For 421 patients, we compute the ENCALS survival model. Univariate and regularized Cox regressions were conducted to estimate the effect of the aforementioned variables on survival. The ROC curve analysis was then employed to a training sub-cohort to identify a ΔLMN cut-off value discriminating ALS patients with prolonged vs short survival. This cut-off value was then cross validated on a test sub-cohort. A multinomial regression model was used to compare different ΔUMN and ΔLMN scores among ENCALS groups.

Results: ΔUMN and ΔLMN showed a negative association with survival (ΔUMN: HR = 1.30; ΔLMN: HR = 4.22). A cut-off value of 0.22 for ΔLMN was identified to predict patients with estimated short vs prolonged survival. ENCALS groups characterized by shorter survival presented significantly higher ΔUMN and ΔLMN scores compared to those with longer survival. No significant association of PUMNS or LMNS gross scores with the above-mentioned variables was observed.

Conclusion: By reflecting the progressing degeneration of the two distinct motor neuron subpopulations, ΔUMN and ΔLMN might represent reliable and easily measurable clinical indexes to estimate survival in ALS.

上肢和下肢运动神经元负荷的变化率与肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者的生存率相关。
背景:我们假设,与UMN和LMN累及的单一量化相比,从症状发作到首次临床评估,上(ΔUMN)和下(ΔLMN)运动神经元体征的变化率是肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者生存和疾病进展的最佳预测指标。方法:对1000例ALS住院患者进行回顾性分析。UMN和LMN体征的负担分别采用Penn上运动神经元评分和下运动神经元评分进行评估。我们计算了421例患者的ENCALS生存模型。采用单变量和正则化Cox回归来估计上述变量对生存率的影响。然后将ROC曲线分析应用于训练亚队列,以确定区分长期和短期生存期ALS患者的ΔLMN临界值。然后在测试亚队列中交叉验证该临界值。采用多项回归模型比较不同ENCALS组的ΔUMN和ΔLMN得分。结果:ΔUMN、ΔLMN与生存率呈负相关(ΔUMN: HR = 1.30;Δlmn: hr = 4.22)。ΔLMN的临界值为0.22,用于预测患者的短期和长期生存。与生存期较长的ENCALS组相比,生存期较短的ENCALS组的ΔUMN和ΔLMN评分明显较高。PUMNS或LMNS总分与上述变量无显著相关性。结论:通过反映两个不同的运动神经元亚群的进展性变性,ΔUMN和ΔLMN可能是估计ALS患者生存的可靠且易于测量的临床指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信