Evaluation of five real-time PCR assays for the detection of Candidozyma auris in clinical specimens.

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
R H T Nijhuis, T Rispens, P C R Godschalk
{"title":"Evaluation of five real-time PCR assays for the detection of Candidozyma auris in clinical specimens.","authors":"R H T Nijhuis, T Rispens, P C R Godschalk","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Candidozyma auris is notorious for its association with invasive infections and hospital outbreaks. Trying to prevent introduction in the hospital, settings are implementing screening procedures including the best diagnostic procedure. In the Netherlands, nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is recommended for this purpose. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison of five different real-time PCR assays for the detection of C. auris. The evaluated assays include the CandidaGenius (Pathonostics), C. auris Detection Kit (Revvity), AurisID (Olm), AltoStar C. auris 1.5 (Altona), and EMC assay (LDT). Analytical evaluation was conducted by assessing selectivity, analytical specificity, reproducibility, and limit of detection (LoD). Subsequently, a clinical evaluation was performed by testing 45 (spiked) clinical specimens. Additionally, all available specimens from a C. auris-colonized patient were tested. The analytical evaluation demonstrated excellent selectivity and specificity for all assays, high reproducibility for most assays, and an excellent LoD for all assays except the Revvity assay. The clinical validation showed excellent sensitivity (100%), high specificity (≥97.8%), and a LoD ranging from 0.3 to 1.8 CFU/PCR for all assays. Fourteen specimens from the colonized patient were tested, of which six, five, and three specimens tested positive using the AltoStar C. auris 1.5, EMC assay, and CandidaGenius, respectively. The results of this evaluation showed that AurisID, AltoStar C. auris 1.5, and the EMC assay performed equally well. All three assays are PCR reagent-only assays that can be easily implemented as screening PCRs to detect C. auris in clinical specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myaf031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Candidozyma auris is notorious for its association with invasive infections and hospital outbreaks. Trying to prevent introduction in the hospital, settings are implementing screening procedures including the best diagnostic procedure. In the Netherlands, nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is recommended for this purpose. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison of five different real-time PCR assays for the detection of C. auris. The evaluated assays include the CandidaGenius (Pathonostics), C. auris Detection Kit (Revvity), AurisID (Olm), AltoStar C. auris 1.5 (Altona), and EMC assay (LDT). Analytical evaluation was conducted by assessing selectivity, analytical specificity, reproducibility, and limit of detection (LoD). Subsequently, a clinical evaluation was performed by testing 45 (spiked) clinical specimens. Additionally, all available specimens from a C. auris-colonized patient were tested. The analytical evaluation demonstrated excellent selectivity and specificity for all assays, high reproducibility for most assays, and an excellent LoD for all assays except the Revvity assay. The clinical validation showed excellent sensitivity (100%), high specificity (≥97.8%), and a LoD ranging from 0.3 to 1.8 CFU/PCR for all assays. Fourteen specimens from the colonized patient were tested, of which six, five, and three specimens tested positive using the AltoStar C. auris 1.5, EMC assay, and CandidaGenius, respectively. The results of this evaluation showed that AurisID, AltoStar C. auris 1.5, and the EMC assay performed equally well. All three assays are PCR reagent-only assays that can be easily implemented as screening PCRs to detect C. auris in clinical specimens.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Journal of Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信