{"title":"Evaluation of five real-time PCR assays for the detection of Candidozyma auris in clinical specimens.","authors":"R H T Nijhuis, T Rispens, P C R Godschalk","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Candidozyma auris is notorious for its association with invasive infections and hospital outbreaks. Trying to prevent introduction in the hospital, settings are implementing screening procedures including the best diagnostic procedure. In the Netherlands, nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is recommended for this purpose. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison of five different real-time PCR assays for the detection of C. auris. The evaluated assays include the CandidaGenius (Pathonostics), C. auris Detection Kit (Revvity), AurisID (Olm), AltoStar C. auris 1.5 (Altona), and EMC assay (LDT). Analytical evaluation was conducted by assessing selectivity, analytical specificity, reproducibility, and limit of detection (LoD). Subsequently, a clinical evaluation was performed by testing 45 (spiked) clinical specimens. Additionally, all available specimens from a C. auris-colonized patient were tested. The analytical evaluation demonstrated excellent selectivity and specificity for all assays, high reproducibility for most assays, and an excellent LoD for all assays except the Revvity assay. The clinical validation showed excellent sensitivity (100%), high specificity (≥97.8%), and a LoD ranging from 0.3 to 1.8 CFU/PCR for all assays. Fourteen specimens from the colonized patient were tested, of which six, five, and three specimens tested positive using the AltoStar C. auris 1.5, EMC assay, and CandidaGenius, respectively. The results of this evaluation showed that AurisID, AltoStar C. auris 1.5, and the EMC assay performed equally well. All three assays are PCR reagent-only assays that can be easily implemented as screening PCRs to detect C. auris in clinical specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myaf031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Candidozyma auris is notorious for its association with invasive infections and hospital outbreaks. Trying to prevent introduction in the hospital, settings are implementing screening procedures including the best diagnostic procedure. In the Netherlands, nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is recommended for this purpose. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison of five different real-time PCR assays for the detection of C. auris. The evaluated assays include the CandidaGenius (Pathonostics), C. auris Detection Kit (Revvity), AurisID (Olm), AltoStar C. auris 1.5 (Altona), and EMC assay (LDT). Analytical evaluation was conducted by assessing selectivity, analytical specificity, reproducibility, and limit of detection (LoD). Subsequently, a clinical evaluation was performed by testing 45 (spiked) clinical specimens. Additionally, all available specimens from a C. auris-colonized patient were tested. The analytical evaluation demonstrated excellent selectivity and specificity for all assays, high reproducibility for most assays, and an excellent LoD for all assays except the Revvity assay. The clinical validation showed excellent sensitivity (100%), high specificity (≥97.8%), and a LoD ranging from 0.3 to 1.8 CFU/PCR for all assays. Fourteen specimens from the colonized patient were tested, of which six, five, and three specimens tested positive using the AltoStar C. auris 1.5, EMC assay, and CandidaGenius, respectively. The results of this evaluation showed that AurisID, AltoStar C. auris 1.5, and the EMC assay performed equally well. All three assays are PCR reagent-only assays that can be easily implemented as screening PCRs to detect C. auris in clinical specimens.
期刊介绍:
Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.