Clinical outcomes among Centchroman users across six medical college hospitals in India.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
A G Radhika, Amita Suneja, Rashmi Gupta, Gowri Dorairajan, Pratima Aggarwal, Venkatesh Ashok, Vanita Suri, Rimpi Singla, Smiti Nanda, Meenakshi Chauhan, Vandana Rani, Nalini Arora, Rachna Chaudhary, Abhilasha Gupta, Rajeev Kumar Malhotra, Shalini Singh
{"title":"Clinical outcomes among Centchroman users across six medical college hospitals in India.","authors":"A G Radhika, Amita Suneja, Rashmi Gupta, Gowri Dorairajan, Pratima Aggarwal, Venkatesh Ashok, Vanita Suri, Rimpi Singla, Smiti Nanda, Meenakshi Chauhan, Vandana Rani, Nalini Arora, Rachna Chaudhary, Abhilasha Gupta, Rajeev Kumar Malhotra, Shalini Singh","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluated the effectiveness, safety, acceptability, and continuation rates of ormiloxifene (Centchroman) which is licensed for contraception only in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective observational analytical study was conducted across six centers in India from June 2019 to May 2023. A mixed cohort of 3139 women who opted for Centchroman out of 36 625 eligible women were followed up for 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of participants was 26 ± 4.4 years. Menstrual abnormalities were the most common side effect, at an average of 1.03-1.17 events per woman. Discontinuation rates were highest within the first 3 months (40.9%) due to menstrual disturbances, notably reduced menstrual flow (60% at 18 months), amenorrhea, heavy or irregular bleeding, and spotting. Life table analysis revealed continuation rates of 78.0%, 47.3%, and 32.2% at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 24 months, respectively. Overall satisfaction from 6 weeks to 12 months after initiation was 75.2%. Failure rate ranged from 0.7%-2.1%. Mean endometrial thickness remained stable throughout the study period (6.54 ± 2.49 to 7.80 ± 1.97 mm), with only two women exhibiting thickened endometrium at 6 months, which was confirmed as secretory endometrium via histopathology. No significant changes in blood pressure or biochemical parameters were observed. Challenges in follow-up and biochemical testing arose due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Centchroman appears to be an effective and affordable non-hormonal contraceptive option, particularly for women contraindicated for hormonal methods. However, pre-emptive counseling regarding potential menstrual side effects is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluated the effectiveness, safety, acceptability, and continuation rates of ormiloxifene (Centchroman) which is licensed for contraception only in India.

Methods: The prospective observational analytical study was conducted across six centers in India from June 2019 to May 2023. A mixed cohort of 3139 women who opted for Centchroman out of 36 625 eligible women were followed up for 24 months.

Results: Mean age of participants was 26 ± 4.4 years. Menstrual abnormalities were the most common side effect, at an average of 1.03-1.17 events per woman. Discontinuation rates were highest within the first 3 months (40.9%) due to menstrual disturbances, notably reduced menstrual flow (60% at 18 months), amenorrhea, heavy or irregular bleeding, and spotting. Life table analysis revealed continuation rates of 78.0%, 47.3%, and 32.2% at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 24 months, respectively. Overall satisfaction from 6 weeks to 12 months after initiation was 75.2%. Failure rate ranged from 0.7%-2.1%. Mean endometrial thickness remained stable throughout the study period (6.54 ± 2.49 to 7.80 ± 1.97 mm), with only two women exhibiting thickened endometrium at 6 months, which was confirmed as secretory endometrium via histopathology. No significant changes in blood pressure or biochemical parameters were observed. Challenges in follow-up and biochemical testing arose due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion: Centchroman appears to be an effective and affordable non-hormonal contraceptive option, particularly for women contraindicated for hormonal methods. However, pre-emptive counseling regarding potential menstrual side effects is crucial.

印度六所医学院医院的Centchroman使用者的临床结果
目的:评价印度仅许可用于避孕的奥米洛昔芬(Centchroman)的有效性、安全性、可接受性和持续率。方法:前瞻性观察性分析研究于2019年6月至2023年5月在印度的六个中心进行。在36625名符合条件的女性中,有3139名女性选择了Centchroman,随访时间为24个月。结果:参与者平均年龄26±4.4岁。月经异常是最常见的副作用,平均每位女性1.03-1.17次。由于月经紊乱,特别是月经流量减少(18个月时为60%)、闭经、大量或不规则出血和点滴出血,前3个月内停药率最高(40.9%)。生命表分析显示,6周、6个月和24个月的延续率分别为78.0%、47.3%和32.2%。开始治疗后6周到12个月的总体满意度为75.2%。故障率从0.7%-2.1%不等。在整个研究期间,平均子宫内膜厚度保持稳定(6.54±2.49 mm至7.80±1.97 mm),只有2名妇女在6个月时表现出子宫内膜增厚,经组织病理学证实为分泌性子宫内膜。血压和生化指标均未见明显变化。COVID-19大流行给后续检测和生化检测带来了挑战。结论:Centchroman似乎是一种有效和负担得起的非激素避孕选择,特别是对激素方法禁忌的妇女。然而,关于潜在的月经副作用的预先咨询是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信