Construction of a computational model of individual progression of motion sickness symptoms based on subjective vertical conflict theory.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Shota Inoue, Van Trong Dang, Hailong Liu, Takahiro Wada
{"title":"Construction of a computational model of individual progression of motion sickness symptoms based on subjective vertical conflict theory.","authors":"Shota Inoue, Van Trong Dang, Hailong Liu, Takahiro Wada","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07052-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational models predicting motion sickness have advanced, particularly those based on subjective vertical conflict (SVC) theory. While SVC-based models primarily predict motion sickness incidence (MSI), which is defined as the percentage of people who would vomit under a given motion, models predicting milder individual symptoms, which are crucial for daily applications, are still required. Recently, computational models predicting vestibular motion-sickness progression using the SVC theory have been developed by changing the output of a 6DOF-SVC model from MSI to the Misery Scale (MISC), a subjective measure of symptom progression. In practical applications, the ability to predict MISC for unseen motions is crucial. The present study conceived a method for predicting MISC beyond a certain point in the future by identifying parameters from data collected up to that point. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of the number of data points used for parameter identification on the future prediction accuracy. Observed MISC responses from participants exposed to linear lateral motion in darkness were used for model validation. The results indicated that prediction accuracy increased as more data points were included. On average, using more than 5-10 min of data significantly increased the accuracy compared to a model using averaged parameter sets across participants, although the tendency significantly differed based on an individual's MISC history. A trial considering individual MISC histories, in which data points were defined when the observed MISC first reached certain levels, showed a general trend of improved accuracy when data up to MISC Level 3 was used. The findings of this study demonstrate that motion sickness symptom progression can be predicted with reduced error by incorporating individual symptom histories, thereby providing a foundation for the development of personalized motion sickness prediction models applicable to broader applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 5","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07052-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational models predicting motion sickness have advanced, particularly those based on subjective vertical conflict (SVC) theory. While SVC-based models primarily predict motion sickness incidence (MSI), which is defined as the percentage of people who would vomit under a given motion, models predicting milder individual symptoms, which are crucial for daily applications, are still required. Recently, computational models predicting vestibular motion-sickness progression using the SVC theory have been developed by changing the output of a 6DOF-SVC model from MSI to the Misery Scale (MISC), a subjective measure of symptom progression. In practical applications, the ability to predict MISC for unseen motions is crucial. The present study conceived a method for predicting MISC beyond a certain point in the future by identifying parameters from data collected up to that point. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of the number of data points used for parameter identification on the future prediction accuracy. Observed MISC responses from participants exposed to linear lateral motion in darkness were used for model validation. The results indicated that prediction accuracy increased as more data points were included. On average, using more than 5-10 min of data significantly increased the accuracy compared to a model using averaged parameter sets across participants, although the tendency significantly differed based on an individual's MISC history. A trial considering individual MISC histories, in which data points were defined when the observed MISC first reached certain levels, showed a general trend of improved accuracy when data up to MISC Level 3 was used. The findings of this study demonstrate that motion sickness symptom progression can be predicted with reduced error by incorporating individual symptom histories, thereby providing a foundation for the development of personalized motion sickness prediction models applicable to broader applications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信