Systematic review of the impact of interventions changing access to lethal means on suicide attempts and deaths.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lisa M Shank, Derek J Smolenski, Courtney Boyd, Dawn M Bellanti, Reshmi Nair, Kiriana Cowansage, Salvatore Libretto, Kamaria Frazier, Daniel P Evatt, Marija S Kelber
{"title":"Systematic review of the impact of interventions changing access to lethal means on suicide attempts and deaths.","authors":"Lisa M Shank, Derek J Smolenski, Courtney Boyd, Dawn M Bellanti, Reshmi Nair, Kiriana Cowansage, Salvatore Libretto, Kamaria Frazier, Daniel P Evatt, Marija S Kelber","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study objective was to examine if interventions changing access to lethal means are associated with changes in suicide deaths and/or attempts by conducting a systematic review of controlled intervention studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors searched key databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL) from inception to March 2024 for longitudinal controlled intervention studies with at least one contemporaneous comparator group evaluating the impact of interventions changing access to lethal means on suicide attempts and/or deaths in a primarily adult population. Reviewers dually screened articles, then extracted study characteristics and assessed methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Researchers screened 8522 studies and 36 articles met eligibility for inclusion. Most studies evaluated the impact of population-level firearm interventions on suicide deaths and found that stricter regulations were associated with a small reduction, if any, in total and/or firearm-specific suicide deaths. The ecological level of analysis precluded individual-level causal inference. Findings within interventions targeting methods other than firearms were limited, mixed and/or inconclusive. Notably, no high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified that met our eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future studies should use an RCT design or advanced statistical causal inference techniques to further elucidate the effectiveness of these interventions on suicide deaths and/or attempts.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022364775.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to examine if interventions changing access to lethal means are associated with changes in suicide deaths and/or attempts by conducting a systematic review of controlled intervention studies.

Methods: Authors searched key databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL) from inception to March 2024 for longitudinal controlled intervention studies with at least one contemporaneous comparator group evaluating the impact of interventions changing access to lethal means on suicide attempts and/or deaths in a primarily adult population. Reviewers dually screened articles, then extracted study characteristics and assessed methodological quality.

Results: Researchers screened 8522 studies and 36 articles met eligibility for inclusion. Most studies evaluated the impact of population-level firearm interventions on suicide deaths and found that stricter regulations were associated with a small reduction, if any, in total and/or firearm-specific suicide deaths. The ecological level of analysis precluded individual-level causal inference. Findings within interventions targeting methods other than firearms were limited, mixed and/or inconclusive. Notably, no high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified that met our eligibility criteria.

Conclusion: Future studies should use an RCT design or advanced statistical causal inference techniques to further elucidate the effectiveness of these interventions on suicide deaths and/or attempts.

Prospero registration number: CRD42022364775.

系统审查改变获取致命手段途径的干预措施对自杀企图和死亡的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是通过对对照干预研究进行系统回顾,检查改变获得致命手段的干预措施是否与自杀死亡和/或企图自杀的变化有关。方法:作者检索了关键数据库(PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL),从开始到2024年3月进行纵向对照干预研究,其中至少有一个同期比较组评估干预措施改变致命手段对主要成年人群自杀企图和/或死亡的影响。审稿人对文章进行双重筛选,然后提取研究特征并评估方法学质量。结果:研究人员筛选了8522项研究,36篇文章符合纳入条件。大多数研究评估了人口层面的枪支干预对自杀死亡的影响,并发现更严格的法规与总体和/或枪支特定自杀死亡人数的小幅减少(如果有的话)有关。生态层面的分析排除了个体层面的因果推理。针对枪支以外的干预方法的调查结果是有限的、混合的和/或不确定的。值得注意的是,没有高质量的随机对照试验(rct)符合我们的入选标准。结论:未来的研究应采用随机对照试验设计或先进的统计因果推断技术来进一步阐明这些干预措施对自杀死亡和/或企图自杀的有效性。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42022364775。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信