Treatment outcomes and comparative survival analysis of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Taylor Stamey, Kristen Armel, Andrew W Ju, Shoujun Chen, Musharraf Navaid, Arjun Bhatt, Michael C Larkins
{"title":"Treatment outcomes and comparative survival analysis of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.","authors":"Taylor Stamey, Kristen Armel, Andrew W Ju, Shoujun Chen, Musharraf Navaid, Arjun Bhatt, Michael C Larkins","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04485-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a rare subset of prostate cancer, for which no consensus treatment guidelines exist. We seek to investigate treatment and survival outcomes for IDC-P in the context of current NCCN guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Cox regression analysis and log-rank comparisons of both overall and cause-specific survival over 5- and 10-year timeframes were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>945 patients were identified. Cox regression analysis demonstrated treatment with unimodal surgery (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.70, p = 0.005) was associated with decreased 10-year cause-specific survival, while unimodal treatment with radiotherapy was associated with decreased 5- and 10-year overall survival (HR = 2.14, p = 0.025; HR = 2.16, p = 0.005, respectively). Univariate survival subanalysis of treatment regimens demonstrated decreased 5-year cause-specific (p = 0.004) and overall (p = 0.019) survival among patients that received only radiotherapy as treatment. Radical prostatectomy alone was non-inferior to radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy in the context of 10-year overall survival (90% vs 80%; p = 0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in both 5- and 10-year overall survival and cause-specific survival were present among patients diagnosed with IDC-P. Treatment with unimodal radiotherapy among patients with IDC-P was associated with decreased survival compared to treatment with radical prostatectomy ± adjuvant radiotherapy, while radical prostatectomy alone was non-inferior to radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Further research into the risk stratification and optimal treatment of these patients is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04485-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a rare subset of prostate cancer, for which no consensus treatment guidelines exist. We seek to investigate treatment and survival outcomes for IDC-P in the context of current NCCN guidelines.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify patients with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Cox regression analysis and log-rank comparisons of both overall and cause-specific survival over 5- and 10-year timeframes were conducted.

Results: 945 patients were identified. Cox regression analysis demonstrated treatment with unimodal surgery (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.70, p = 0.005) was associated with decreased 10-year cause-specific survival, while unimodal treatment with radiotherapy was associated with decreased 5- and 10-year overall survival (HR = 2.14, p = 0.025; HR = 2.16, p = 0.005, respectively). Univariate survival subanalysis of treatment regimens demonstrated decreased 5-year cause-specific (p = 0.004) and overall (p = 0.019) survival among patients that received only radiotherapy as treatment. Radical prostatectomy alone was non-inferior to radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy in the context of 10-year overall survival (90% vs 80%; p = 0.58).

Conclusion: Differences in both 5- and 10-year overall survival and cause-specific survival were present among patients diagnosed with IDC-P. Treatment with unimodal radiotherapy among patients with IDC-P was associated with decreased survival compared to treatment with radical prostatectomy ± adjuvant radiotherapy, while radical prostatectomy alone was non-inferior to radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Further research into the risk stratification and optimal treatment of these patients is warranted.

前列腺导管内癌的治疗效果和生存期比较分析。
目的:前列腺导管内癌是一种罕见的前列腺癌,目前尚无一致的治疗指南。我们试图在当前NCCN指南的背景下调查IDC-P的治疗和生存结果。方法:对监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库进行查询,以确定2000年至2020年间诊断为前列腺导管内癌的患者。对5年和10年的总生存率和病因特异性生存率进行了Cox回归分析和对数秩比较。结果:共发现945例患者。Cox回归分析显示,单峰手术治疗(风险比(HR) = 3.70, p = 0.005)与10年病因特异性生存率降低相关,而单峰放疗治疗与5年和10年总生存率降低相关(HR = 2.14, p = 0.025;HR = 2.16, p = 0.005)。治疗方案的单因素生存亚分析显示,仅接受放疗的患者的5年病因特异性(p = 0.004)和总生存率(p = 0.019)下降。在10年总生存率方面,单纯根治性前列腺切除术不低于根治性前列腺切除术加辅助放疗(90% vs 80%;p = 0.58)。结论:在诊断为IDC-P的患者中,5年和10年总生存率以及病因特异性生存率均存在差异。与根治性前列腺切除术+辅助放疗相比,单峰放疗与肝癌患者的生存率降低有关,而单纯根治性前列腺切除术的生存率不低于根治性前列腺切除术+辅助放疗。对这些患者的风险分层和最佳治疗进行进一步的研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信