Classification of ocular surface diseases: Deep learning for distinguishing ocular surface squamous neoplasia from pterygium.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Farshid Ramezani, Hossein Azimi, Behrouz Delfanian, Mobina Amanollahi, Jamshid Saeidian, Ahmad Masoumi, Hossein Farrokhpour, Elias Khalili Pour, Mehdi Khodaparast
{"title":"Classification of ocular surface diseases: Deep learning for distinguishing ocular surface squamous neoplasia from pterygium.","authors":"Farshid Ramezani, Hossein Azimi, Behrouz Delfanian, Mobina Amanollahi, Jamshid Saeidian, Ahmad Masoumi, Hossein Farrokhpour, Elias Khalili Pour, Mehdi Khodaparast","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06804-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the significance and potential risks associated with Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia (OSSN) and the importance of its differentiation from other conditions, we aimed to develop a Deep Learning (DL) model differentiating OSSN from pterygium (PTG) using slit photographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset comprising slit photographs of 162 patients including 77 images of OSSN and 85 images of PTG was assembled. After manual segmentation of the images, a Python-based transfer learning approach utilizing the EfficientNet B7 network was employed for automated image segmentation. GoogleNet, a pre-trained neural network was used to categorize the images into OSSN or PTG. To evaluate the performance of our DL model, K-Fold 10 Cross Validation was implemented, and various performance metrics were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in mean age between the OSSN (63.23 ± 13.74 years) and PTG groups (47.18 ± 11.53) (P-value =.000). Furthermore, 84.41% of patients in the OSSN group and 80.00% of the patients in the PTG group were male. Our classification model, trained on automatically segmented images, demonstrated reliable performance measures in distinguishing OSSN from PTG, with an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 98%, sensitivity, F1 score, and accuracy of 94%, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents a novel DL model that effectively segments and classifies OSSN from PTG images with a relatively high accuracy. In addition to its clinical use, this model can be potentially used as a telemedicine application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06804-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Given the significance and potential risks associated with Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia (OSSN) and the importance of its differentiation from other conditions, we aimed to develop a Deep Learning (DL) model differentiating OSSN from pterygium (PTG) using slit photographs.

Methods: A dataset comprising slit photographs of 162 patients including 77 images of OSSN and 85 images of PTG was assembled. After manual segmentation of the images, a Python-based transfer learning approach utilizing the EfficientNet B7 network was employed for automated image segmentation. GoogleNet, a pre-trained neural network was used to categorize the images into OSSN or PTG. To evaluate the performance of our DL model, K-Fold 10 Cross Validation was implemented, and various performance metrics were measured.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in mean age between the OSSN (63.23 ± 13.74 years) and PTG groups (47.18 ± 11.53) (P-value =.000). Furthermore, 84.41% of patients in the OSSN group and 80.00% of the patients in the PTG group were male. Our classification model, trained on automatically segmented images, demonstrated reliable performance measures in distinguishing OSSN from PTG, with an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 98%, sensitivity, F1 score, and accuracy of 94%, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 88%.

Conclusions: This study presents a novel DL model that effectively segments and classifies OSSN from PTG images with a relatively high accuracy. In addition to its clinical use, this model can be potentially used as a telemedicine application.

眼表疾病的分类:深度学习区分眼表鳞状瘤变与翼状胬肉。
目的:考虑到眼表鳞状瘤变(OSSN)的重要性和潜在风险,以及与其他疾病区分的重要性,我们旨在开发一种深度学习(DL)模型,利用切口照片区分OSSN和翼状胬肉(PTG)。方法:收集162例患者的裂隙照片,其中OSSN图像77张,PTG图像85张。在对图像进行人工分割后,采用基于python的迁移学习方法利用effentnet B7网络进行自动图像分割。使用预训练的神经网络GoogleNet将图像分类为OSSN或PTG。为了评估DL模型的性能,我们实施了K-Fold 10交叉验证,并测量了各种性能指标。结果:OSSN组(63.23±13.74岁)与PTG组(47.18±11.53岁)的平均年龄差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.000)。OSSN组84.41%的患者为男性,PTG组80.00%的患者为男性。我们的分类模型经过自动分割图像的训练,在区分OSSN和PTG方面表现出可靠的性能指标,曲线下面积(AUC)为98%,灵敏度、F1评分和准确率为94%,马修斯相关系数(MCC)为88%。结论:本研究提出了一种新的深度学习模型,可以有效地从PTG图像中分割和分类osn,并且准确率较高。除了临床应用之外,该模型还可以潜在地用作远程医疗应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信