Personalized risk-adapted models in prostate cancer during active surveillance using MRI-a narrative review.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Davide Maffei, Caroline M Moore
{"title":"Personalized risk-adapted models in prostate cancer during active surveillance using MRI-a narrative review.","authors":"Davide Maffei, Caroline M Moore","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11518-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of histologically defined prostate cancer (PCa) is common and rises with age. Nevertheless, histological evidence of PCa does not always lead to clinically evident or life-threatening disease, and we know that PSA-based population screening can find twice the prevalence of PCa than would present via clinical routes. The PROTECT study randomized men diagnosed through PSA screening, to surgery, radiotherapy, or active monitoring. At 15 years, PCa-related deaths ranged from 2.1% in the surgery group to 2.9% in the active monitoring group, while the risk of death from other causes was 22%. Modern PCa diagnosis uses MRI to determine who needs a biopsy and how it is done. Multiparametric MRI can selectively detect PCa of higher grade and volume, which is more likely to be associated with progression, metastases, and death, and hence to benefit from treatment. MRI and MRI-targeted biopsies are recommended prior to enrolment in active surveillance (AS) programs for accurate risk classification. The UCLH AS cohort based on per-cause MRI evaluations has shown baseline Gleason grade and MRI index lesion visibility to be strong predictors of progression to treatment. Serial evaluation with MRI has been codified with the PRECISE recommendations to support MRI-based monitoring during AS. AS recommendations have extended to certain favorable-intermediate risk cancers. The Movember International Consensus Meeting has determined a dynamic risk-stratified AS approach to be the highest-ranked research priority. We review the impact of MRI on AS from patient selection to risk stratification, and the development of MRI-led personalized AS protocols. KEY POINTS: Question Standardized protocols are not able to address the heterogeneity of men on active surveillance for PCa and are burdened by unnecessary examinations. Findings MRI can improve the selection of men for active surveillance, predict time to treatment, and risk-stratify patients at risk of progression. Clinical relevance MRI-led risk-adapted protocols may reduce the burden of active surveillance on patients, improve adherence, and reduce healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11518-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of histologically defined prostate cancer (PCa) is common and rises with age. Nevertheless, histological evidence of PCa does not always lead to clinically evident or life-threatening disease, and we know that PSA-based population screening can find twice the prevalence of PCa than would present via clinical routes. The PROTECT study randomized men diagnosed through PSA screening, to surgery, radiotherapy, or active monitoring. At 15 years, PCa-related deaths ranged from 2.1% in the surgery group to 2.9% in the active monitoring group, while the risk of death from other causes was 22%. Modern PCa diagnosis uses MRI to determine who needs a biopsy and how it is done. Multiparametric MRI can selectively detect PCa of higher grade and volume, which is more likely to be associated with progression, metastases, and death, and hence to benefit from treatment. MRI and MRI-targeted biopsies are recommended prior to enrolment in active surveillance (AS) programs for accurate risk classification. The UCLH AS cohort based on per-cause MRI evaluations has shown baseline Gleason grade and MRI index lesion visibility to be strong predictors of progression to treatment. Serial evaluation with MRI has been codified with the PRECISE recommendations to support MRI-based monitoring during AS. AS recommendations have extended to certain favorable-intermediate risk cancers. The Movember International Consensus Meeting has determined a dynamic risk-stratified AS approach to be the highest-ranked research priority. We review the impact of MRI on AS from patient selection to risk stratification, and the development of MRI-led personalized AS protocols. KEY POINTS: Question Standardized protocols are not able to address the heterogeneity of men on active surveillance for PCa and are burdened by unnecessary examinations. Findings MRI can improve the selection of men for active surveillance, predict time to treatment, and risk-stratify patients at risk of progression. Clinical relevance MRI-led risk-adapted protocols may reduce the burden of active surveillance on patients, improve adherence, and reduce healthcare costs.

在mri主动监测期间前列腺癌的个性化风险适应模型-叙述性回顾。
组织学上确定的前列腺癌(PCa)的存在是常见的,并随着年龄的增长而增加。然而,前列腺癌的组织学证据并不总是导致临床明显或危及生命的疾病,我们知道基于psa的人群筛查可以发现两倍于通过临床途径呈现的前列腺癌患病率。PROTECT研究将通过PSA筛查确诊的男性随机分为手术、放疗或主动监测组。15年时,与前列腺癌相关的死亡率从手术组的2.1%到积极监测组的2.9%不等,而其他原因导致的死亡风险为22%。现代前列腺癌诊断使用MRI来确定谁需要活检以及如何进行活检。多参数MRI可以选择性地检测到更高级别和体积的前列腺癌,这些前列腺癌更可能与进展、转移和死亡相关,因此可以从治疗中获益。在参加主动监测(AS)计划之前,建议进行MRI和MRI靶向活检,以便准确地进行风险分类。基于每因MRI评估的UCLH AS队列显示,基线Gleason分级和MRI指数病变可见性是治疗进展的有力预测因素。MRI系列评估已被编入编入PRECISE建议,以支持AS期间基于MRI的监测。AS的建议已扩展到某些有利的中等风险癌症。八字胡十一月国际共识会议已经确定了动态风险分层的AS方法是最高优先级的研究。我们回顾了MRI对AS的影响,从患者选择到风险分层,以及MRI主导的个性化AS方案的发展。标准化的方案不能解决男性主动监测前列腺癌的异质性,而且有不必要的检查负担。MRI可以改善主动监测男性的选择,预测治疗时间,并对有进展风险的患者进行风险分层。临床相关性mri引导的风险适应方案可以减轻患者主动监测的负担,提高依从性,并降低医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信