The use of oral anticoagulation at the time of acute COVID-19 infection and subsequent development of long-COVID/post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1007/s11239-025-03096-0
Freddy Frost, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Gregory Y H Lip
{"title":"The use of oral anticoagulation at the time of acute COVID-19 infection and subsequent development of long-COVID/post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.","authors":"Freddy Frost, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Gregory Y H Lip","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03096-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long COVID (LC) or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is defined as ongoing, relapsing or new symptoms/conditions persisting after an acute COVID-19 infection. Given the potential role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in treating thrombotic sequelae of LC/PASC, we investigated whether prevalent OAC use at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced development of LC/PASC. Retrospective cohort study within the TriNetx network. The primary cohort was defined as adults with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. We defined OAC users as those who had received OACs (either direct-acting OACs [DOACs] or vitamin K antagonists [VKA]) in the preceding 3-months and non-users as those without OAC use within the previous 12-months. The primary outcome was a composite of 9 features associated with LC/PASC We identified 38,409 DOAC users, 19,243 VKA users, and 2,329,771 non-OAC users with acute COVID-19 infection. After successful propensity score matching (PSM), we found an increased risk of LC/PASC features in those receiving DOAC compared to non-OAC (HR [95% CI] 1.50 [1.35 to 1.68], p < 0.0001), and in VKA users compared to non-OACs (HR [95% CI] 1.98 [1.78 to 2.20], p < 0.0001), while DOAC users were at reduced risk compared to VKA users (HR [95% CI] 0.71 [0.62 to 0.81], p < 0.0001). We found no evidence that prevalent OAC at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced risk of LC/PASC. Further work is needed to understand whether there is a role for OAC therapy in the management of LC/PASC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"585-589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03096-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long COVID (LC) or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is defined as ongoing, relapsing or new symptoms/conditions persisting after an acute COVID-19 infection. Given the potential role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in treating thrombotic sequelae of LC/PASC, we investigated whether prevalent OAC use at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced development of LC/PASC. Retrospective cohort study within the TriNetx network. The primary cohort was defined as adults with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. We defined OAC users as those who had received OACs (either direct-acting OACs [DOACs] or vitamin K antagonists [VKA]) in the preceding 3-months and non-users as those without OAC use within the previous 12-months. The primary outcome was a composite of 9 features associated with LC/PASC We identified 38,409 DOAC users, 19,243 VKA users, and 2,329,771 non-OAC users with acute COVID-19 infection. After successful propensity score matching (PSM), we found an increased risk of LC/PASC features in those receiving DOAC compared to non-OAC (HR [95% CI] 1.50 [1.35 to 1.68], p < 0.0001), and in VKA users compared to non-OACs (HR [95% CI] 1.98 [1.78 to 2.20], p < 0.0001), while DOAC users were at reduced risk compared to VKA users (HR [95% CI] 0.71 [0.62 to 0.81], p < 0.0001). We found no evidence that prevalent OAC at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced risk of LC/PASC. Further work is needed to understand whether there is a role for OAC therapy in the management of LC/PASC.

Abstract Image

急性COVID-19感染时口服抗凝剂的使用以及随后出现的SARS-CoV-2感染的长时间covid /急性后后遗症。
长COVID (LC)或SARS-CoV-2感染急性后后遗症(PASC)被定义为急性COVID-19感染后持续、复发或持续出现新症状/状况。鉴于口服抗凝剂(OAC)在治疗LC/PASC血栓性后遗症中的潜在作用,我们研究了急性COVID-19感染时普遍使用OAC是否与LC/PASC的发生减少有关。TriNetx网络中的回顾性队列研究。主要队列定义为确诊为COVID-19的成年人。我们将OAC使用者定义为在过去3个月内接受OAC(直接作用OAC [DOACs]或维生素K拮抗剂[VKA])的患者,而非OAC使用者定义为在过去12个月内未使用OAC的患者。主要结局是与LC/PASC相关的9个特征的综合结果。我们确定了38,409名DOAC用户,19,243名VKA用户和2,329,771名非oac用户急性COVID-19感染。在成功的倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,我们发现,与未接受oac的患者相比,接受DOAC的患者LC/PASC特征的风险增加(HR [95% CI] 1.50[1.35至1.68],p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信