The use of oral anticoagulation at the time of acute COVID-19 infection and subsequent development of long-COVID/post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Freddy Frost, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Gregory Y H Lip
{"title":"The use of oral anticoagulation at the time of acute COVID-19 infection and subsequent development of long-COVID/post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.","authors":"Freddy Frost, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Gregory Y H Lip","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03096-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long COVID (LC) or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is defined as ongoing, relapsing or new symptoms/conditions persisting after an acute COVID-19 infection. Given the potential role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in treating thrombotic sequelae of LC/PASC, we investigated whether prevalent OAC use at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced development of LC/PASC. Retrospective cohort study within the TriNetx network. The primary cohort was defined as adults with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. We defined OAC users as those who had received OACs (either direct-acting OACs [DOACs] or vitamin K antagonists [VKA]) in the preceding 3-months and non-users as those without OAC use within the previous 12-months. The primary outcome was a composite of 9 features associated with LC/PASC We identified 38,409 DOAC users, 19,243 VKA users, and 2,329,771 non-OAC users with acute COVID-19 infection. After successful propensity score matching (PSM), we found an increased risk of LC/PASC features in those receiving DOAC compared to non-OAC (HR [95% CI] 1.50 [1.35 to 1.68], p < 0.0001), and in VKA users compared to non-OACs (HR [95% CI] 1.98 [1.78 to 2.20], p < 0.0001), while DOAC users were at reduced risk compared to VKA users (HR [95% CI] 0.71 [0.62 to 0.81], p < 0.0001). We found no evidence that prevalent OAC at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced risk of LC/PASC. Further work is needed to understand whether there is a role for OAC therapy in the management of LC/PASC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03096-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Long COVID (LC) or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is defined as ongoing, relapsing or new symptoms/conditions persisting after an acute COVID-19 infection. Given the potential role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in treating thrombotic sequelae of LC/PASC, we investigated whether prevalent OAC use at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced development of LC/PASC. Retrospective cohort study within the TriNetx network. The primary cohort was defined as adults with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. We defined OAC users as those who had received OACs (either direct-acting OACs [DOACs] or vitamin K antagonists [VKA]) in the preceding 3-months and non-users as those without OAC use within the previous 12-months. The primary outcome was a composite of 9 features associated with LC/PASC We identified 38,409 DOAC users, 19,243 VKA users, and 2,329,771 non-OAC users with acute COVID-19 infection. After successful propensity score matching (PSM), we found an increased risk of LC/PASC features in those receiving DOAC compared to non-OAC (HR [95% CI] 1.50 [1.35 to 1.68], p < 0.0001), and in VKA users compared to non-OACs (HR [95% CI] 1.98 [1.78 to 2.20], p < 0.0001), while DOAC users were at reduced risk compared to VKA users (HR [95% CI] 0.71 [0.62 to 0.81], p < 0.0001). We found no evidence that prevalent OAC at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced risk of LC/PASC. Further work is needed to understand whether there is a role for OAC therapy in the management of LC/PASC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care.
The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.