Interest of inulin in obesity: comparison of the prebiotic effect of edible-food sources versus purified inulin from chicory root.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Audrey M Neyrinck, Julie Rodriguez, Candido Robles Sánchez, Manon Autuori, Patrice D Cani, Laure B Bindels, Jérôme Bindelle, Nathalie M Delzenne
{"title":"Interest of inulin in obesity: comparison of the prebiotic effect of edible-food sources versus purified inulin from chicory root.","authors":"Audrey M Neyrinck, Julie Rodriguez, Candido Robles Sánchez, Manon Autuori, Patrice D Cani, Laure B Bindels, Jérôme Bindelle, Nathalie M Delzenne","doi":"10.1007/s00394-025-03640-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inulin-type fructans (ITF) are fermentable dietary fibres (DF) that can confer beneficial metabolic health effects through changes in the gut microbiota. Many papers suggest that complex food rich in DF could be more relevant than purified DF in terms of health effect. We compared the prebiotic effect of natural source of inulin (scorzonera) versus native inulin extracted from chicory root in a model of obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice were fed during 6 weeks a low-fat (LF), high-fat (HF) or high-fat diet enriched with either purified inulin from chicory root (Inu) or lyophilized scorzonera (Sco), with the same amount of ITF intake (10%) versus a non-fermentable fibre (cellulose). Metabolic parameters were correlated with the gut microbiome composition (16S rRNA gene sequencing).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both inulin sources reduced food intake without significantly modifying body weight gain or adiposity compared to HF. Purified inulin and lyophilized scorzonera differentially modulate the gut physiology and microbiota. Both inulin and scorzonera shifted global gut microbial composition from HF group, decreased members of Desulfovibrionaceae and boosted bifidobacteria level. Some effects were specific to Sco group, such as the increase of Akkermansia and the decrease of Bacteroides, that correlated to biological outcomes. Inu improved hepatic steatosis whereas scorzonera boosted intestinal immunity markers and antimicrobial peptides expression, and increased intestinal crypt depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences occur between natural edible versus isolated sources of ITF. Both sources of inulin shifted the gut microbiota, but differently affected intestinal and lipid homeostasis. This study highlights the importance of food matrix and origins of fructans for their use in the context of metabolic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 4","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03640-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Inulin-type fructans (ITF) are fermentable dietary fibres (DF) that can confer beneficial metabolic health effects through changes in the gut microbiota. Many papers suggest that complex food rich in DF could be more relevant than purified DF in terms of health effect. We compared the prebiotic effect of natural source of inulin (scorzonera) versus native inulin extracted from chicory root in a model of obesity.

Methods: Mice were fed during 6 weeks a low-fat (LF), high-fat (HF) or high-fat diet enriched with either purified inulin from chicory root (Inu) or lyophilized scorzonera (Sco), with the same amount of ITF intake (10%) versus a non-fermentable fibre (cellulose). Metabolic parameters were correlated with the gut microbiome composition (16S rRNA gene sequencing).

Results: Both inulin sources reduced food intake without significantly modifying body weight gain or adiposity compared to HF. Purified inulin and lyophilized scorzonera differentially modulate the gut physiology and microbiota. Both inulin and scorzonera shifted global gut microbial composition from HF group, decreased members of Desulfovibrionaceae and boosted bifidobacteria level. Some effects were specific to Sco group, such as the increase of Akkermansia and the decrease of Bacteroides, that correlated to biological outcomes. Inu improved hepatic steatosis whereas scorzonera boosted intestinal immunity markers and antimicrobial peptides expression, and increased intestinal crypt depth.

Conclusion: Differences occur between natural edible versus isolated sources of ITF. Both sources of inulin shifted the gut microbiota, but differently affected intestinal and lipid homeostasis. This study highlights the importance of food matrix and origins of fructans for their use in the context of metabolic disorders.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信