3D assessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue for prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jinxiong Zhang, Shuoling Zhou, Yurong Jiang, Wei Zhao, Weiguo Xu, Jiawei Zhang, Taixue An, Jianfeng Yan, Chongyang Duan, Xiaojun Wang, Sihui Yang, Tao Wang, Dandan Dong, Yuan Chen, Feixiang Zou, Xiangrong Yu, Meiyan Huang, Sirui Fu
{"title":"3D assessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue for prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Jinxiong Zhang, Shuoling Zhou, Yurong Jiang, Wei Zhao, Weiguo Xu, Jiawei Zhang, Taixue An, Jianfeng Yan, Chongyang Duan, Xiaojun Wang, Sihui Yang, Tao Wang, Dandan Dong, Yuan Chen, Feixiang Zou, Xiangrong Yu, Meiyan Huang, Sirui Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Changes in protein and lipid metabolism could provide additional prognostic information for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).This study aimed to explore whether 3D automatic assessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue can contribute to the precise prognosis for HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 458 HCC patients from 6 hospitals were divided into training and external validation datasets. Preoperative CT Images were used for this study. First, we tested the stability of the 2D factors. Second, we tested whether standardization for volume assessment was necessary. Third, we compared the clinical (Model<sup>C</sup>), skeletal muscle and adipose tissue (Model<sup>NSA</sup>), and combined (Model<sup>C-NSA</sup>) models by discrimination and calibration to identify the optimal model. Subgroup analysis was performed for the optimal model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 16 2D factors, 13 factors were statistically different among the three 2D slices. Standardization of the volume factors was necessary. Among the three models, Model<sup>C-NSA</sup> had a higher area under the curve [AUC] than Model<sup>C</sup> and Model<sup>NSA</sup>, both in the training dataset (0.809 vs. 0.649 vs. 0.797) and the validation dataset (0.770 vs. 0.718 vs. 0.719). For calibration, the performance of Model<sup>C-NSA</sup> was similar to those of Model<sup>C</sup> and Model<sup>NSA</sup>. The performance of Model<sup>C-NSA</sup> was not influenced by age (P=0.753), sex (P=0.781), treatments (P=0.504), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage (P=0.913), or Child-Pugh class (P=0.580).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to 2D evaluation, 3D assessment is more stable. 3D automatic assessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue can accurately predict progression in patients with HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.03.168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Changes in protein and lipid metabolism could provide additional prognostic information for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).This study aimed to explore whether 3D automatic assessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue can contribute to the precise prognosis for HCC.

Methods: The data of 458 HCC patients from 6 hospitals were divided into training and external validation datasets. Preoperative CT Images were used for this study. First, we tested the stability of the 2D factors. Second, we tested whether standardization for volume assessment was necessary. Third, we compared the clinical (ModelC), skeletal muscle and adipose tissue (ModelNSA), and combined (ModelC-NSA) models by discrimination and calibration to identify the optimal model. Subgroup analysis was performed for the optimal model.

Results: For the 16 2D factors, 13 factors were statistically different among the three 2D slices. Standardization of the volume factors was necessary. Among the three models, ModelC-NSA had a higher area under the curve [AUC] than ModelC and ModelNSA, both in the training dataset (0.809 vs. 0.649 vs. 0.797) and the validation dataset (0.770 vs. 0.718 vs. 0.719). For calibration, the performance of ModelC-NSA was similar to those of ModelC and ModelNSA. The performance of ModelC-NSA was not influenced by age (P=0.753), sex (P=0.781), treatments (P=0.504), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage (P=0.913), or Child-Pugh class (P=0.580).

Conclusions: Compared to 2D evaluation, 3D assessment is more stable. 3D automatic assessment of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue can accurately predict progression in patients with HCC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信