Psychosocial stress factors in families with preterm infants during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Alina Fendel, Tamara Fuschlberger, Anna Friedmann, Ina Nehring, Marcus Krüger, Volker Mall, Verena Kraus
{"title":"Psychosocial stress factors in families with preterm infants during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Alina Fendel, Tamara Fuschlberger, Anna Friedmann, Ina Nehring, Marcus Krüger, Volker Mall, Verena Kraus","doi":"10.1186/s13034-025-00890-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Covid-19 pandemic restrictions severely impacted parents' and children's mental and physical health. Families with pre-existing stress factors may have been particularly affected. Parental stress following premature birth is well acknowledged. The addition of the pandemic restrictions to stressors related to premature birth may constitute an especially high-risk factor for family stress and thereby neuropsychological development. Accessibility to special preterm follow-up care programs is important for neuropsychological development and faced additional relevance in the face of pandemic related stressors. We studied the hypothesis that families with preterm born infants were particularly adversely affected by the pandemic-related restrictions in comparison to families with term born infants. Specific stress factors were explored as well as the accessibility of support programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, families were recruited in a neonatology unit with the highest level of care according to German regulations. A questionnaire on perceived pandemic stress factors including amongst others: social contacts, family support, intrafamilial conflicts, leisure activities, and family planning was completed by 101 parents of prematurely born infants while pandemic related restrictions were still in place. We distinguished preterm infants with low gestational age and birth weight from other preterm infants and term born infants. T-tests, Chi-Square tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and binary logistic regression analysis were applied to compare the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stress levels resulting from restricted social contacts, family conflicts and accessibility to family support services were significantly higher in families with term-born infants. The accessibility of targeted follow-up care programs for preterm infants was significantly lower for moderate and late preterm infants. The pandemic has had an influence on the decision of parents to have more children in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Families with preterm infants were less stressed by the pandemic than those with term infants. Targeted follow-up care focused on high-risk groups and left moderate and late preterm infants without medical check-ups. This reflects the general focus in society on high-risk populations during the pandemic. The pandemic had an influence on family planning in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9934,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-025-00890-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic restrictions severely impacted parents' and children's mental and physical health. Families with pre-existing stress factors may have been particularly affected. Parental stress following premature birth is well acknowledged. The addition of the pandemic restrictions to stressors related to premature birth may constitute an especially high-risk factor for family stress and thereby neuropsychological development. Accessibility to special preterm follow-up care programs is important for neuropsychological development and faced additional relevance in the face of pandemic related stressors. We studied the hypothesis that families with preterm born infants were particularly adversely affected by the pandemic-related restrictions in comparison to families with term born infants. Specific stress factors were explored as well as the accessibility of support programs.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, families were recruited in a neonatology unit with the highest level of care according to German regulations. A questionnaire on perceived pandemic stress factors including amongst others: social contacts, family support, intrafamilial conflicts, leisure activities, and family planning was completed by 101 parents of prematurely born infants while pandemic related restrictions were still in place. We distinguished preterm infants with low gestational age and birth weight from other preterm infants and term born infants. T-tests, Chi-Square tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and binary logistic regression analysis were applied to compare the subgroups.

Results: The stress levels resulting from restricted social contacts, family conflicts and accessibility to family support services were significantly higher in families with term-born infants. The accessibility of targeted follow-up care programs for preterm infants was significantly lower for moderate and late preterm infants. The pandemic has had an influence on the decision of parents to have more children in both groups.

Conclusion: Families with preterm infants were less stressed by the pandemic than those with term infants. Targeted follow-up care focused on high-risk groups and left moderate and late preterm infants without medical check-ups. This reflects the general focus in society on high-risk populations during the pandemic. The pandemic had an influence on family planning in both groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health PEDIATRICSPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, the official journal of the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions, is an open access, online journal that provides an international platform for rapid and comprehensive scientific communication on child and adolescent mental health across different cultural backgrounds. CAPMH serves as a scientifically rigorous and broadly open forum for both interdisciplinary and cross-cultural exchange of research information, involving psychiatrists, paediatricians, psychologists, neuroscientists, and allied disciplines. The journal focusses on improving the knowledge base for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions in children and adolescents, and aims to integrate basic science, clinical research and the practical implementation of research findings. In addition, aspects which are still underrepresented in the traditional journals such as neurobiology and neuropsychology of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence are considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信