Safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting using a 6F guiding catheter via right distal radial artery access.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lifeng Wang, Xu Guo, Zhe Song, Xiaofen He, Xia Ma, Xiaoping Zhang
{"title":"Safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting using a 6F guiding catheter via right distal radial artery access.","authors":"Lifeng Wang, Xu Guo, Zhe Song, Xiaofen He, Xia Ma, Xiaoping Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12883-025-04139-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a 6 F guiding catheter via right distal radial artery access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 32 patients who underwent internal carotid artery C1 stenting via right distal transradial artery access (rdTRA) at the Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, between January 2022 and December 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Parameters including puncture time, X-ray irradiation time, exposure dose, surgical success rate, surgery-related cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, puncture site complications, and postoperative radial artery patency were recorded and assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The procedural success rate of CAS through rdTRA was 100% (32/32). The time from operating room entry to successful puncture ranged from 3 to 36 min, with an average time of 18.56 ± 7.63 min. X-ray exposure time ranged from 12 to 27 min, with an average time of 19.18 ± 4.77 min. One patient experienced a procedure-related transient ischemic attack postoperatively, while another developed bruising along the radial artery course on the third postoperative day. During an out-of-hospital follow-up period averaging 1 to 29 months (median: 5.4 ± 3.6 months), no cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were reported. The radial pulse was palpable in all patients postoperatively and during the follow-up, with radial artery patency confirmed through patency testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carotid artery stenting through rdTRA using a 6 F guiding catheter is a safe and feasible approach, demonstrating high procedural success and minimal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"25 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04139-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a 6 F guiding catheter via right distal radial artery access.

Methods: The clinical data of 32 patients who underwent internal carotid artery C1 stenting via right distal transradial artery access (rdTRA) at the Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, between January 2022 and December 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Parameters including puncture time, X-ray irradiation time, exposure dose, surgical success rate, surgery-related cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, puncture site complications, and postoperative radial artery patency were recorded and assessed.

Results: The procedural success rate of CAS through rdTRA was 100% (32/32). The time from operating room entry to successful puncture ranged from 3 to 36 min, with an average time of 18.56 ± 7.63 min. X-ray exposure time ranged from 12 to 27 min, with an average time of 19.18 ± 4.77 min. One patient experienced a procedure-related transient ischemic attack postoperatively, while another developed bruising along the radial artery course on the third postoperative day. During an out-of-hospital follow-up period averaging 1 to 29 months (median: 5.4 ± 3.6 months), no cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were reported. The radial pulse was palpable in all patients postoperatively and during the follow-up, with radial artery patency confirmed through patency testing.

Conclusion: Carotid artery stenting through rdTRA using a 6 F guiding catheter is a safe and feasible approach, demonstrating high procedural success and minimal complications.

6F导管经右桡动脉远端通路置入颈动脉支架的安全性和可行性。
目的:本研究旨在评价颈动脉支架植入术的安全性和可行性,采用6f导管经右桡动脉远端通路。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年12月在北京安贞医院脑血管病科行右远端经桡动脉通路(rdTRA)行颈内动脉C1支架置入术的32例患者的临床资料。记录并评估穿刺时间、x线照射时间、照射剂量、手术成功率、手术相关心脑血管并发症、穿刺部位并发症、术后桡动脉通畅等参数。结果:经rdTRA行CAS手术成功率为100%(32/32)。从进入手术室到穿刺成功的时间范围为3 ~ 36 min,平均时间为18.56±7.63 min。x线暴露时间范围为12 ~ 27 min,平均时间为19.18±4.77 min。1例患者术后出现手术相关短暂性脑缺血发作,1例患者术后第3天出现桡动脉沿程瘀伤。院外随访期平均为1 ~ 29个月(中位:5.4±3.6个月),无心脑血管事件报告。所有患者术后及随访均可触及桡动脉脉搏,通过通畅试验证实桡动脉通畅。结论:采用6f导管经rdTRA行颈动脉支架置入术安全可行,手术成功率高,并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信