The augmentative efficacy of second-generation anti-psychotics (SGA) to anti-depressants in treating treatment-resistant depression: a network meta-regression analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Binru Bai, Yuwei Li, Xi Chen, Jinsong Huang, Qiaoling Chen, Xinyuan Du, Chengfang Huang, Yi Yang
{"title":"The augmentative efficacy of second-generation anti-psychotics (SGA) to anti-depressants in treating treatment-resistant depression: a network meta-regression analysis.","authors":"Binru Bai, Yuwei Li, Xi Chen, Jinsong Huang, Qiaoling Chen, Xinyuan Du, Chengfang Huang, Yi Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06783-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the augmentative efficacy of second-generation anti-psychotics (SGA) to anti-depressants in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) adjusting follow-up period and explore the underlying\"time window\"effects of the regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases included Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholars as well as Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to May 15, 2024, for relevant randomized controlled studies (RCTs) were retrieved. The primary endpoint was Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The secondary endpoint was MADRS response rate. The tertiary endpoints were Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S) and MADRS remission rate. Standard mean difference (SMD) and hazard ratio (HR) were generated by Bayesian network meta-regression (NMR) for pairwise comparisons on dichotomous and consecutive variants, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 studies (N = 10679) with 24 augmentation agents were included in the NMR. For the primary endpoint, compared with ADT, aripiprazole 3 - 12 mg/d, brexpiprazole 1 - 3 mg/d, cariprazine 1.5 - 3 mg/d, olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d and fluoxetine 25 - 50 mg/d combination, and quetiapine XR were significantly effective (SMD ranged from - 0.28 to - 0.114) and their effect sizes were comparable, after adjusting follow-up period, the results resembled the former except for quetiapine XR (SMD = - 0.10, 95%CI: - 0.212 to 0.014). Brexpiprazole 3 mg/d (7.22 weeks), cariprazine 1 - 2 mg/d (2.97 weeks), cariprazine 2-4.5 mg/d (2.81 weeks), cariprazine 3 mg/d (7.16 weeks), olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d (4.11 weeks) and quetiapine 150 - 300 mg/d (3.89 weeks) showed\"time window\". For the secondary endpoint, brexpiprazole 3 mg/d and rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d was evidently superior to all others (HR ranged from 1.748 to 2.301). For the tertiary endpoints, as for CGI-S, aripiprazole 2 - 20 mg/d, brexpiprazole 2 - 3 mg/d, cariprazine 3 mg/d, olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d and fluoxetine 25 - 50 mg/d combination, and rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d were conspicuously effective compared with ADT (SMD ranged from - 0.438 to - 0.126) and for MADRS remission rate, aripiprazole 2 - 20 mg/d, brexpiprazole 3 mg/d, cariprazine 3 mg/d, rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d were conspicuously effective compared with ADT (HR ranged from 0.477 to 3.326).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Holistically considering each endpoint and corresponding \"time window\", certain SGAs appeared to be efficient augmentation to anti-depressants for TRD, but aripiprazole was relatively more effective and better tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06783-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the augmentative efficacy of second-generation anti-psychotics (SGA) to anti-depressants in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) adjusting follow-up period and explore the underlying"time window"effects of the regimens.

Methods: Databases included Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholars as well as Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to May 15, 2024, for relevant randomized controlled studies (RCTs) were retrieved. The primary endpoint was Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The secondary endpoint was MADRS response rate. The tertiary endpoints were Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S) and MADRS remission rate. Standard mean difference (SMD) and hazard ratio (HR) were generated by Bayesian network meta-regression (NMR) for pairwise comparisons on dichotomous and consecutive variants, respectively.

Results: A total of 23 studies (N = 10679) with 24 augmentation agents were included in the NMR. For the primary endpoint, compared with ADT, aripiprazole 3 - 12 mg/d, brexpiprazole 1 - 3 mg/d, cariprazine 1.5 - 3 mg/d, olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d and fluoxetine 25 - 50 mg/d combination, and quetiapine XR were significantly effective (SMD ranged from - 0.28 to - 0.114) and their effect sizes were comparable, after adjusting follow-up period, the results resembled the former except for quetiapine XR (SMD = - 0.10, 95%CI: - 0.212 to 0.014). Brexpiprazole 3 mg/d (7.22 weeks), cariprazine 1 - 2 mg/d (2.97 weeks), cariprazine 2-4.5 mg/d (2.81 weeks), cariprazine 3 mg/d (7.16 weeks), olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d (4.11 weeks) and quetiapine 150 - 300 mg/d (3.89 weeks) showed"time window". For the secondary endpoint, brexpiprazole 3 mg/d and rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d was evidently superior to all others (HR ranged from 1.748 to 2.301). For the tertiary endpoints, as for CGI-S, aripiprazole 2 - 20 mg/d, brexpiprazole 2 - 3 mg/d, cariprazine 3 mg/d, olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d and fluoxetine 25 - 50 mg/d combination, and rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d were conspicuously effective compared with ADT (SMD ranged from - 0.438 to - 0.126) and for MADRS remission rate, aripiprazole 2 - 20 mg/d, brexpiprazole 3 mg/d, cariprazine 3 mg/d, rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d were conspicuously effective compared with ADT (HR ranged from 0.477 to 3.326).

Conclusion: Holistically considering each endpoint and corresponding "time window", certain SGAs appeared to be efficient augmentation to anti-depressants for TRD, but aripiprazole was relatively more effective and better tolerated.

第二代抗精神病药(SGA)对抗抑郁药治疗难治性抑郁症的增强疗效:网络元回归分析。
背景:比较第二代抗精神病药(SGA)与抗抑郁药在成人难治性抑郁症(TRD)调整随访期的增强疗效,探讨两种方案潜在的“时间窗”效应。方法:检索Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、谷歌Scholars以及Clinicaltrials.gov等数据库自成立以来至2024年5月15日的相关随机对照研究(RCTs)。主要终点为Montgomery Asberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)。次要终点为MADRS反应率。第三终点是临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)和MADRS缓解率。采用贝叶斯网络元回归(NMR)生成标准均差(SMD)和风险比(HR),分别对二分类和连续变异进行两两比较。结果:共有23项研究(N = 10679)纳入了24种增强剂。对于主要终点,与ADT相比,阿立哌唑3 ~ 12mg /d、布雷哌唑1 ~ 3mg /d、卡吡嗪1.5 ~ 3mg /d、奥氮平6 ~ 12mg /d、氟西汀25 ~ 50mg /d联合用药以及喹硫平XR均显著有效(SMD范围为- 0.28 ~ - 0.114),且其效应量具有可比性,调整随访期后,除喹硫平XR外,结果与前者相似(SMD = - 0.10, 95%CI: - 0.212 ~ 0.014)。Brexpiprazole 3 mg/d(7.22周)、cariprazine 1 ~ 2mg /d(2.97周)、cariprazine 2 ~ 4.5 mg/d(2.81周)、cariprazine 3 mg/d(7.16周)、奥氮平6 ~ 12mg /d(4.11周)、喹硫平150 ~ 300mg /d(3.89周)出现“时间窗口”。对于次要终点,brexpiprazole 3mg /d和rispri酮0.5 ~ 3mg /d明显优于其他所有终点(HR范围为1.748 ~ 2.301)。第三端点,至于CGI-S,阿立哌唑2 - 20 mg / d, brexpiprazole 2 - 3毫克/天,cariprazine 3毫克/天,奥氮平6 - 12毫克/ d和氟西汀25 - 50 mg / d组合,和rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg / d明显有效而ADT (SMD范围从- 0.438 - 0.126)MADRS缓解率,阿立哌唑2 - 20 mg / d, brexpiprazole 3毫克/天,cariprazine 3毫克/天,rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg / d明显有效而ADT(人力资源范围从0.477到3.326)。结论:综合考虑各终点和相应的“时间窗”,某些SGAs似乎是TRD抗抑郁药物的有效补充,但阿立哌唑相对更有效,耐受性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信