Prevalence and clinical impact of bacterial co-infection in chronaturenic pulmonary aspergillosis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Fatma Tokgöz Akyıl, Sida Gösterici, Hülya Abalı, Derya Hırçın Cenger, Çiğdem Sabancı, Sinem Sökücü, Sedat Altın
{"title":"Prevalence and clinical impact of bacterial co-infection in chronaturenic pulmonary aspergillosis.","authors":"Fatma Tokgöz Akyıl, Sida Gösterici, Hülya Abalı, Derya Hırçın Cenger, Çiğdem Sabancı, Sinem Sökücü, Sedat Altın","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03623-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical significance of co-infection with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) and bacteria is limited and has mostly been studied in specific patient groups. This study aims to investigate the incidence and prognostic impact of bacterial co-infection in patients with CPA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted between 2019 and 2024. Patients were categorized based on the presence of bacterial co-infection, and their demographics, potential underlying factors, and prognosis were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients were included (mean age: 57 ± 13 years, 79 male). Bacterial co-infection was identified in 21 patients (21%). The most common bacterial pathogens at diagnosis were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 6), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5), Escherichia coli (n = 4), and Serratia marcescens (n = 4). Five patients had a history of prior bacterial colonization. At diagnosis, more than one bacterial species were identified in six patients. Sputum production and hypoxemic respiratory failure were more frequently observed in patients with bacterial co-infection. Systemic corticosteroid use was more common in the co-infected group. However, radiological findings and diagnostic procedures did not differ between the groups. Surgical interventions were more commonly performed in the non-co-infected group. During the follow-up, hospital admission rates, mortality, and overall survival were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bacterial co-infections are probable in CPA and follow-up results of both patient Groups may not differ. Timely diagnosis and close follow-up of these patients are probable key factors in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03623-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical significance of co-infection with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) and bacteria is limited and has mostly been studied in specific patient groups. This study aims to investigate the incidence and prognostic impact of bacterial co-infection in patients with CPA.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted between 2019 and 2024. Patients were categorized based on the presence of bacterial co-infection, and their demographics, potential underlying factors, and prognosis were analyzed.

Results: A total of 101 patients were included (mean age: 57 ± 13 years, 79 male). Bacterial co-infection was identified in 21 patients (21%). The most common bacterial pathogens at diagnosis were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 6), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5), Escherichia coli (n = 4), and Serratia marcescens (n = 4). Five patients had a history of prior bacterial colonization. At diagnosis, more than one bacterial species were identified in six patients. Sputum production and hypoxemic respiratory failure were more frequently observed in patients with bacterial co-infection. Systemic corticosteroid use was more common in the co-infected group. However, radiological findings and diagnostic procedures did not differ between the groups. Surgical interventions were more commonly performed in the non-co-infected group. During the follow-up, hospital admission rates, mortality, and overall survival were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: Bacterial co-infections are probable in CPA and follow-up results of both patient Groups may not differ. Timely diagnosis and close follow-up of these patients are probable key factors in these patients.

慢性肺曲霉病细菌合并感染的患病率及临床影响。
背景:慢性肺曲霉菌病(CPA)与细菌合并感染的临床意义有限,且大多针对特定患者群体进行研究。本研究旨在探讨细菌合并感染在 CPA 患者中的发生率和对预后的影响:2019年至2024年期间进行了一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。根据是否存在细菌合并感染对患者进行分类,并分析其人口统计学特征、潜在的基础因素和预后:共纳入 101 名患者(平均年龄:57 ± 13 岁,79 名男性)。21名患者(21%)合并细菌感染。诊断时最常见的细菌病原体为铜绿假单胞菌(6 例)、肺炎克雷伯菌(5 例)、大肠埃希菌(4 例)和肉毒杆菌(4 例)。五名患者曾有细菌定植史。确诊时,6 名患者的细菌种类超过一种。合并细菌感染的患者更常出现痰液增多和呼吸衰竭。合并感染组患者更常使用全身性皮质类固醇。不过,两组患者的放射学检查结果和诊断程序并无差异。非合并感染组患者更常接受外科手术治疗。在随访期间,两组患者的入院率、死亡率和总生存率相当:结论:细菌合并感染在 CPA 中很可能发生,两组患者的随访结果可能没有差异。及时诊断和密切随访可能是这些患者的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信