Lessons to learn from pilot studies in clinical trials: The example of a trauma-focused treatment for female survivors of intimate partner violence

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Silvia Sánchez-Ferrer, Ana A. Antón, Alejandro Miguel-Alvaro, María Crespo
{"title":"Lessons to learn from pilot studies in clinical trials: The example of a trauma-focused treatment for female survivors of intimate partner violence","authors":"Silvia Sánchez-Ferrer,&nbsp;Ana A. Antón,&nbsp;Alejandro Miguel-Alvaro,&nbsp;María Crespo","doi":"10.1002/capr.12843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research on pilot studies is scarce, despite their importance for the development of effective clinical trials. There is a lack of work addressing the process, limitations and strategies derived from these studies. This gap is even more evident in research studying targeted populations, such as victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), who present specific difficulties, such as high dropout rates, or require the application of challenging treatments, such as trauma-focussed exposure therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This paper describes a pilot study (PS) implemented as a preliminary step in the development of a clinical trial (CT), in which a trauma-focussed treatment for survivors of IPV with post-traumatic symptomatology was applied. The problems identified in the PS and the solutions that were implemented in the CT are described. Additionally, comparisons between the PS and CT with respect to participant adherence to treatment and satisfaction, as perceived by the participants and the therapist, are analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicate that satisfaction with the treatment was high in both studies; dropouts showed a significant decrease in the CT (25% in CT vs. 75% in the PS; <i>p</i> = .028), while group cohesion increased.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>It is concluded that conducting pilot studies allows adapting treatments to the study population, which seems to increase the quality of clinical trials, subsequently improving the evidence of psychological interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12843","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research on pilot studies is scarce, despite their importance for the development of effective clinical trials. There is a lack of work addressing the process, limitations and strategies derived from these studies. This gap is even more evident in research studying targeted populations, such as victims of intimate partner violence (IPV), who present specific difficulties, such as high dropout rates, or require the application of challenging treatments, such as trauma-focussed exposure therapy.

Aim

This paper describes a pilot study (PS) implemented as a preliminary step in the development of a clinical trial (CT), in which a trauma-focussed treatment for survivors of IPV with post-traumatic symptomatology was applied. The problems identified in the PS and the solutions that were implemented in the CT are described. Additionally, comparisons between the PS and CT with respect to participant adherence to treatment and satisfaction, as perceived by the participants and the therapist, are analysed.

Results

Results indicate that satisfaction with the treatment was high in both studies; dropouts showed a significant decrease in the CT (25% in CT vs. 75% in the PS; p = .028), while group cohesion increased.

Conclusions

It is concluded that conducting pilot studies allows adapting treatments to the study population, which seems to increase the quality of clinical trials, subsequently improving the evidence of psychological interventions.

从临床试验试点研究中吸取的教训:亲密伴侣暴力的女性幸存者以创伤为重点的治疗的例子
背景 尽管试验研究对开发有效的临床试验非常重要,但有关试验研究的研究却很少。目前还缺乏针对这些研究的过程、局限性和策略的研究。在研究目标人群(如亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)受害者)时,这种差距更为明显,因为这些人群存在特殊困难(如辍学率高),或需要采用具有挑战性的治疗方法(如创伤焦点暴露疗法)。 本文介绍了一项试点研究(PS),该研究是临床试验(CT)发展的初步步骤,其中针对具有创伤后症状的 IPV 幸存者采用了以创伤为中心的治疗方法。本文介绍了在 PS 中发现的问题以及在 CT 中实施的解决方案。此外,还分析了 PS 和 CT 在参与者坚持治疗以及参与者和治疗师认为的满意度方面的比较。 结果表明,两项研究的治疗满意度都很高;CT 的辍学率显著下降(CT 为 25%,PS 为 75%;p = .028),而团体凝聚力有所增强。 结论 开展试点研究可以根据研究人群调整治疗方法,这似乎可以提高临床试验的质量,从而改进心理干预的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信