Simulation to Improve Medical Student Understanding of Doulas' Role

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-04-06 DOI:10.1111/tct.70085
Caroline N. Goldfarb, Celeste Royce, Salvatore Daddario, Jeannette C. Myrick, Laura Pichardo, Kimberley Campbell, Elysia Larson
{"title":"Simulation to Improve Medical Student Understanding of Doulas' Role","authors":"Caroline N. Goldfarb,&nbsp;Celeste Royce,&nbsp;Salvatore Daddario,&nbsp;Jeannette C. Myrick,&nbsp;Laura Pichardo,&nbsp;Kimberley Campbell,&nbsp;Elysia Larson","doi":"10.1111/tct.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Birth doula services in the United States are increasingly covered by insurance and sought out by patients. To be effective team members on labour and delivery (L&amp;D), it is critical that medical students understand doulas' role and how to collaborate with doulas in patient care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>To this end, we developed an L&amp;D simulation for students to practice working with doulas. Preclinical medical students participated with an obstetrician, anesthesiologist, nurse and doula in a simulated patient birth and debrief.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>A descriptive evaluation was conducted via presimulation and postsimulation surveys asking students to evaluate their comfort “caring for a patient with a doula” and understanding of the “doula [role] during a delivery” on a 7-point scale. Presimulation to postsimulation comparisons were done with linear regressions with clustering. This project received a nonhuman subjects research determination. In total, 255 students participated across 2 years; 212 students completed surveys. Of students who completed presimulation surveys (<i>N</i> = 201), 17.8% had previous L&amp;D experience. Participating in the simulation significantly increased both students' comfort collaborating with a doula (3.1 points) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9–3.4) and their understanding of the doula role (3.2 points) (95% CI: 2.9–3.5). Presimulation, students with prior L&amp;D experience had higher understanding of doulas' role than those without experience (0.70 points, 95% CI: 0.09–1.3).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Including birth doulas in obstetric simulations is an effective method to improve preclinical medical students' awareness and understanding of the doula role, providing an important opportunity to improve L&amp;D collaboration and patient care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Birth doula services in the United States are increasingly covered by insurance and sought out by patients. To be effective team members on labour and delivery (L&D), it is critical that medical students understand doulas' role and how to collaborate with doulas in patient care.

Approach

To this end, we developed an L&D simulation for students to practice working with doulas. Preclinical medical students participated with an obstetrician, anesthesiologist, nurse and doula in a simulated patient birth and debrief.

Evaluation

A descriptive evaluation was conducted via presimulation and postsimulation surveys asking students to evaluate their comfort “caring for a patient with a doula” and understanding of the “doula [role] during a delivery” on a 7-point scale. Presimulation to postsimulation comparisons were done with linear regressions with clustering. This project received a nonhuman subjects research determination. In total, 255 students participated across 2 years; 212 students completed surveys. Of students who completed presimulation surveys (N = 201), 17.8% had previous L&D experience. Participating in the simulation significantly increased both students' comfort collaborating with a doula (3.1 points) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9–3.4) and their understanding of the doula role (3.2 points) (95% CI: 2.9–3.5). Presimulation, students with prior L&D experience had higher understanding of doulas' role than those without experience (0.70 points, 95% CI: 0.09–1.3).

Implications

Including birth doulas in obstetric simulations is an effective method to improve preclinical medical students' awareness and understanding of the doula role, providing an important opportunity to improve L&D collaboration and patient care.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信