Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality During Outpatient Sedation-Free Colonoscopy: A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Myriam Ayari, Sameh Riahi, Mohamed Hedi Douggui, Taieb Jomni
{"title":"Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality During Outpatient Sedation-Free Colonoscopy: A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study","authors":"Myriam Ayari,&nbsp;Sameh Riahi,&nbsp;Mohamed Hedi Douggui,&nbsp;Taieb Jomni","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Colonoscopy is the gold standard for accurate exploration of the colon. Thus, it must be performed as efficiently as possible. The patient's tolerance considerably affects the quality of sedation free examinations. Pharmacological sedation can solve this issue; however, it can expose to significant adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of immersive virtual reality (VR) during sedation-free colonoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a prospective controlled study including outpatients presenting for unsedated colonoscopy. Patients were randomized into Group 1: colonoscopy with VR headset and Group 2: without intervention. Anxiety, comfort, and pain were respectively evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI), Gloucester scale and the verbal rating scale (VRS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 63 patients were included: intervention group G1 (<i>n</i> = 33) and control group G2 (<i>n</i> = 30). A slightly lower time to caecal intubation was noted in the intervention group without significant difference (G1 = 19 min vs. G2 = 26 min, <i>p</i> = 0.07). Patients with VR mask expressed lower levels of post-procedural anxiety than those in the control group (mean STAI G1 = 47 vs. G2 = 53, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and a significant decrease in the STAI score compared to pre-endoscopy values (8 vs. 4 points, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The per-procedural pain assessed by VRS was significantly lower in the patients using VR (Mean G1 = 0.44 vs. G2 = 1.32, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Moreover, endoscopic examination was found to be more comfortable with VR based on the Gloucester scale <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Immersive VR technology is a promising, noninvasive and well-accepted tool for improving tolerance by reducing colonoscopy induced pain and anxiety allowing an optimized examination.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70563","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for accurate exploration of the colon. Thus, it must be performed as efficiently as possible. The patient's tolerance considerably affects the quality of sedation free examinations. Pharmacological sedation can solve this issue; however, it can expose to significant adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of immersive virtual reality (VR) during sedation-free colonoscopy.

Methods

We conducted a prospective controlled study including outpatients presenting for unsedated colonoscopy. Patients were randomized into Group 1: colonoscopy with VR headset and Group 2: without intervention. Anxiety, comfort, and pain were respectively evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI), Gloucester scale and the verbal rating scale (VRS).

Results

In total, 63 patients were included: intervention group G1 (n = 33) and control group G2 (n = 30). A slightly lower time to caecal intubation was noted in the intervention group without significant difference (G1 = 19 min vs. G2 = 26 min, p = 0.07). Patients with VR mask expressed lower levels of post-procedural anxiety than those in the control group (mean STAI G1 = 47 vs. G2 = 53, p < 0.01) and a significant decrease in the STAI score compared to pre-endoscopy values (8 vs. 4 points, p < 0.01). The per-procedural pain assessed by VRS was significantly lower in the patients using VR (Mean G1 = 0.44 vs. G2 = 1.32, p < 0.01). Moreover, endoscopic examination was found to be more comfortable with VR based on the Gloucester scale p < 0.01.

Conclusions

Immersive VR technology is a promising, noninvasive and well-accepted tool for improving tolerance by reducing colonoscopy induced pain and anxiety allowing an optimized examination.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信